Why not Dak?

Irvin88_4life

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,492
Reaction score
26,367
yes another thread: but for you and for all the people saying pay Dak, you need to see and understand something:

What is the common point between the Super Bowls games played in the last 10 years?

answer: QB

what is the common point?

answer:
all the QBs that played the super bowl are first round draft picks except for 3, Tom Brady, Jimmy Garoppolo, Russell Wilson.

Dak is not like Tom Brady, Dak is not like Russel Wilson, Dak is not like Jimmy Garappolo, Dak will be another Tony Romo, he can give good games, and expectations, but you will never win the big games.
over paid for he, will be another big mistake.

if the cowboys want to win a Super Bowl, need to pick a First Round QB. or find for another gem in the first rounds

the cowboys dont need a moron who wants to take advantage of a situation to get rich. Dak dont want to be a cowboys, he want to be rich, without showing that he can win big games
Nick Foles was a 3rd round pick
 

marius

Active Member
Messages
186
Reaction score
128
your logic is not logical ! lol
if brady wilson or garapolo had played in dallas under garrett the last 4 years, I guarantee none of them would
have went to a SB.
What you and other non dak people are not seeing in that dak , as well as other players will be better
under MM and his new staff.
We really need to see them all 1 season under new coaches, and then judge them.

Your 1st round qb thinking is also off, because look at all the first round picks that never went to playoffs, much less SB. Mayfield is a 1st rounder , and 2 years and cant make playoffs. And he doesnt appear to be better than dak.


I'm not saying that all of the first round QBs are going to play or played in the super bowl, but most of the QB that have played in the super bowl are first round selections, that's the difference, at least one QB first round with good couches, gives you more chance of being in the super bowl, than a moron wanting to get rich, without showing that he can win big games
 

SSoup

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,087
Reaction score
1,194
This is a profoundly dumb take.

You know that literally 50% of the 20 Super Bowl teams in the last 10 years were QB'ed by a non-1st rounder, so you just announce up-front that he's automatically not 3 of those guys you concede as if that means anything. As if that bolsters your wrong argument.

You also intentionally leave Foles and Kaepernick off the list of names you concede because you know Dak is easily better than either of them and that doesn't fit your narrative either.

Not sure what mental gymnastics you're doing to justify narrowing the argument to only the last 10 years either. I could understand limiting it to just the Salary Cap era.

But even then, off the top of my head: Brees and Warner (three times) and Favre (two times) and Hasselbeck and Gannon and Delhomme and Johnson. And I'm too lazy to look it up right now but I'll eat my hat if Chandler and Humphries and O'Donnell were all 1st rounders. Those Super Bowls all took place during the Salary Cap era, so they're all perfectly relevant to me.
 

black label

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,919
Reaction score
8,100
What dacky for two firsts, much better off. Touchdowns matter lol not throwing of ur back foot 5 years later lol
 

glimmerman

Well-Known Member
Messages
30,041
Reaction score
29,902
yes another thread: but for you and for all the people saying pay Dak, you need to see and understand something:

What is the common point between the Super Bowls games played in the last 10 years?

answer: QB

what is the common point?

answer:
all the QBs that played the super bowl are first round draft picks except for 3, Tom Brady, Jimmy Garoppolo, Russell Wilson.

Dak is not like Tom Brady, Dak is not like Russel Wilson, Dak is not like Jimmy Garappolo, Dak will be another Tony Romo, he can give good games, and expectations, but you will never win the big games.
over paid for he, will be another big mistake.

if the cowboys want to win a Super Bowl, need to pick a First Round QB. or find for another gem in the first rounds

the cowboys dont need a moron who wants to take advantage of a situation to get rich. Dak dont want to be a cowboys, he want to be rich, without showing that he can win big games
So your answer is trade away our draft this year and maybe next year to trade up and get a player thats never played a down in the NFL.
 

Runwildboys

Confused about stuff
Messages
50,437
Reaction score
94,445
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
maybe not in numbers, but Garappolo lead the team to the Super Bowl, Dak can't win big games
It looked to me like once the game was in Garappolo's hands, they stopped scoring. I don't know, I'm not a Dakophant, but I think SF's coaching, play calling, running game, and defense carried them to the SB, not Garappolo. I think Dak is the better player of the two.
 

Typhus

Captain Catfish
Messages
19,830
Reaction score
22,694
There really needs to be one Dak Prescott contract forum.

I hate it, but I am serious.

It is now time.
At least a thread consolidation on all Dak speculation.. opinion.
There are plenty of other areas of this team that need discussing,, Dak is the easy lazy thread starter,,, please MODS just end this.
 

817Gill

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,141
Reaction score
19,113
Yeah Dak played real well in the Super Bowl you watched him in. When you’re on your meds, Madden looks incredibly realistic apparently.
Wow, that also changes the fact Dak’s postseason performances have been better than Jimmy G’s! You’re on a roll man
:clap:
 

Super_Kazuya

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,074
Reaction score
9,113
Wow, that also changes the fact Dak’s postseason performances have been better than Jimmy G’s! You’re on a roll man
:clap:
Wow you repeating yourself also makes you sound as stupid as you did the first time. Wake me up if Dak ever gets to either a championship game or a Super Bowl game and then we’ll compare Dak’s performance to QBs that have played in higher stakes games than winning a wild card game as a game manager.
:clap:
 

817Gill

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,141
Reaction score
19,113
Wow you repeating yourself also makes you sound as stupid as you did the first time. Wake me up if Dak ever gets to either a championship game or a Super Bowl game and then we’ll compare Dak’s performance to QBs that have played in higher stakes games than winning a wild card game as a game manager.
:clap:
Still don’t change it lmaoo literally nothing you can say will change a fact haha Dak was better in every metric in postseason performances. Jimmy Handoffs can try again next year
:laugh:
 

Super_Kazuya

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,074
Reaction score
9,113
Still don’t change it lmaoo literally nothing you can say will change a fact haha Dak was better in every metric in postseason performances. Jimmy Handoffs can try again next year
:laugh:
Literally nothing you say is true, you can try again next year. Wake me up when Dak gets to the Super Bowl.
:laugh:
 

817Gill

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,141
Reaction score
19,113
Literally nothing you say is true, you can try again next year. Wake me up when Dak gets to the Super Bowl.
:laugh:
So you’re trying to say, that jimmy G played better in his postseason appearances than Dak has in his? Not the team success, not the advancement. Simply the individual performances, you think Jimmy G was better?

Yeah that’s not even arguable bro lol
 
Top