CeeDee Lamb: Over or under 50 receptions

Amarillofan82

Well-Known Member
Messages
958
Reaction score
889
I actually think the under for 50 catches, yet not by much at all. Not because he won't be good, but due to the way the offseason is playing out, and the time it takes to develop chemistry with the QB and scheme.

However, injuries could change things easy. Cooper or Gallup out, and Lamb will see more looks.

Right now I am leaning towards 48 catches and 700 yards with 6 TD's
 

JonCJG

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,175
Reaction score
162
Under.

40 receptions or less, under 600 yards. Guy is not explosive.
 

reddyuta

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,775
Reaction score
16,510
Under.

40 receptions or less, under 600 yards. Guy is not explosive.
giphy.gif
 

Tussinman

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,239
Reaction score
3,893
Easy over.

I see him being simliar to Calvin Ridleys rookie year (receptions in the mid 60s for 800 yards).

Simliar situation as Ridley as well (come into a team that already has a good support cast of WR, a good offensive line, and a good QB).

People harp about high pick WRs struggling but they mostly go to crap teams or teams not deep at WR so the teams try to have them do too much right off the bat.
 

Bullflop

Cowboys Diehard
Messages
24,533
Reaction score
29,885
I'm torn between the two! With that being the case, I'll guess it's 50 catches 850 yards. Not bad for a rookie, I'd say! 17 YPC. :)
 
Last edited:
Top