CouchCoach
Staff member
- Messages
- 41,122
- Reaction score
- 74,904
They were not solid on D. They haven't been solid on D in decades.2016 was the only year we were solid across the board.
They were not solid on D. They haven't been solid on D in decades.2016 was the only year we were solid across the board.
I meant offensively. Yeh defensively has been poor for a very long timeThey were not solid on D. They haven't been solid on D in decades.
The Cowboys have been like the old Chargers. O is good enough to go all the way and D is bad enough top prevent that.I meant offensively. Yeh defensively has been poor for a very long time
I won't ridicule you since I agree with you.
There are people so aligned with this team that the minute a coach or player becomes a part of it, they begin selling themselves. I have debated Nolan in other threads and gave up because he doesn't carry his own bags but the baggage of the teams he was on. His many, many stops during his career were with all bad teams and the last two stops were not as the DC and I think that is for a good reason.
However, I don't know what other choices McC had for a DC so Nolan could be the cutest pick of an ugly litter.
Joe Montana and Steve Young never lacked for weapons in San Francisco. I suppose that means we should question their Hall of Fame credentials.
You’ll never get away with this one. You are using the ole eye test.Just notice how bad his footwork is when throwing the ball.
Hence why he has major accuracy problems.
He dances back there cause he's in panic mode and nervous and his feet tell the tale.
If you can honestly try to compare these 2, you’ll just never get it. These 2 QBs are light years apart.What are his accuracy problems? He has a career comp % of 65.8. Just to compare pat mahomes has a career comp % of 65.9 just sayin
It’s as simple as watch the games.Provide me with stats that shows his inaccuracy that's all I ask.
You have nothing got it.It’s as simple as watch the games.
I just compared their accuracy. Is it wrong?If you can honestly try to compare these 2, you’ll just never get it. These 2 QBs are light years apart.
You’ll never get away with this one. You are using the ole eye test.
Who has a better career winning % against winning teams Dak or Romo? Go!Yep, I should read the stats.....hey wait a minute is this stat correct......All we managed is to beat up on DOG teams???
Yes Sir the eyes can't be trusted!!!!
Who has a better career winning % against winning teams Dak or Romo? Go!
Lol come on whats the answer?
Who cares? Neither has or will win anything under center.Who has a better career winning % against winning teams Dak or Romo? Go!
Lol you salty!!!!!!!!Who cares? Neither has or will win anything under center.
Pretty much. If you're still wondering or denying that Dak has had the best situation for a QB to start his career in history then you're not being honest.I mean it’s true. No QB in the history of the NFL has started their career with a better OL and RB combo. Now his receivers on the other hand, have not always been up to snuff but that was reflected in his bottom of the league passing TD totals the first three years.
He had one of them by virtue of being a low level pick. The other three were Marino, Brady and Rothliesberger.Pretty much. If you're still wondering or denying that Dak has had the best situation for a QB to start his career in history then you're not being honest.
Lol our o line in 2018 was terrible and zeke hasnt been the same since 2016 tes and wrs were average at best until last year and they still dropped a league high in passesPretty much. If you're still wondering or denying that Dak has had the best situation for a QB to start his career in history then you're not being honest.
Except that that's a team stat, not an individual one.
Fail!