This the issue people have. They don't know what the hell they talking about and they think France and Dak don't either lol. like they didn't weight these options. Cowboyzone accounts are the worse lol. Thanks for educating him.
So wouldn't next season his singing bonus be even bigger? Its not lost money whenever he signs he's going to see that signing bonus unless I'm missing something?
You know they still won't listen. I work in $$ and math. Numbers don't lie. If they don't think France and dak aren't working with accountants, attorneys, and money managers they are delusional.
In their minds they think taking the 50 million up front will net him more over 2 years than taking money down the road which is false just due to basic math and average annual investment returns.
I already know. They swear they the smartest people in the room.
biggest whiffs were holding on to certain municipal stocks too long. mostly electrical generating in large cities like detroit. didn't lose, but didn't make hardly what i hoped i would. but i learned from the experience and only invest in growing municipalities. and i'm far more prone to selling quicker.
Yeah I'm not understanding the logic. They say he's missing out on his 50 million dollar signing bonus but that signing bonus isn't going anywhere. He will always get a signing bonus and if he gets it next year it may be even more than 50....I'm failing to see the money he's leaving out there...maybe short term I guess but it will still come.
Thats the hardest thing to learn is to just bail and take the hits. I play in some day trading on the side but the client assets i have in management is more long term risk adverse funds.
"I'll gladly pay you tuesday for a hamburger today"................wimpy from popeye. as for me, i'll always take the money today as opposed to tomorrow. the idea, imo, is to use money to make money. if i'm worried about taxes, just don't make as much. none of know what the future holds. if the nfl sold stock, i wouldn't be buying for a while.
They think he can make it up in investments over that short period of time. Which the #'s dont support.
Yes us normal people would because we can't project our income growth 2 years down the road and most income doesn't grow exponentially over a 5 year period. Dak and his agents can, the market, and franchise tags lay it out for them.
none of the financial persons in knew in the 80's predicted the savings and loan crash in the mid 80's. many of my friends lost fortunes. many bought houses with variable interest rates on advice of experts and lost their butts when the houses became worth less than the purchase price a few years later and their incomes decreased. the lesson i learned was commodities rock. people need electricity, water, food, etc. there's no getting around it.
an influx of cash flow is not always the best financial move. that's what I was saying. I talk as a whole you just want to be "right" in your little box of word games.
No words games
"How many consecutive years can you tag the same player?"
It's all in the Henny lol
