Twitter: Fisher: Cowboys restructure Zack Martin contract

blueblood70

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,734
Reaction score
27,009
Show some damn respect. That's your starting RDE you are talking about!
no hes not he will be lost inside all year.RDE is loaded, hes back to his natural inside..still his deal is far too bloated for my comfort..need money grab half of Crawfords..
 

PhillyCowboysFan

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,062
Reaction score
4,968
In other years a team can rollover up to 5% of their total cap amount but because so many other rules have changed because of the issue we can't talk about, the amount of rollover this year has been raised to 15%
.
.


I never heard there was a percentage, interesting.
 

fivetwos

Well-Known Member
Messages
19,330
Reaction score
26,252
no hes not he will be lost inside all year.RDE is loaded, hes back to his natural inside..still his deal is far too bloated for my comfort..need money grab half of Crawfords..
Lost everywhere.

Maybe he will shock the world and finally make a few plays this season. Not holding breath.

Not even a sack, just disrupt a play and I'll count it.

I'd wager quite a bit the bill still comes in at over a million a play.
 

fivetwos

Well-Known Member
Messages
19,330
Reaction score
26,252
Show some damn respect. That's your starting RDE you are talking about!
I haven't looked at the official depth chart because who cares, but....

The only case that can be made for him bringing anything at all to the table is veteran experience at 3T with Hill and Gallimore.

If they use him otherwise its hurting the team and useless.
 

Bowdown27

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,424
Reaction score
7,670
We got 8 million in cap space?! Here comes earl!....After week 1!! ...maybe... probably not :muttley:
 

aria

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,543
Reaction score
16,793
He's making over 30 million this year. They are PAYING THE MAN.
This year...they could have been paying him that for the next 4 years but they backed themselves into a corner when they caved to the ewoks diva hissy fit.

Now they’re gonna have to pay for it literally and/or figuratively.
 
Last edited:

cern

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,900
Reaction score
21,050
who will we lose next year so that dak can be signed. the texans got rid of deandre hopkins who they knew they wouldn't be able to afford and got a used up rb and a couple of draft picks. think that helps deseaun watson? i wouldnt bet on it.. we bring in lambo. for every credit on the ledger sheet there is a corresponding debit. i hope kc and the financially flexed mahomey run all over the texans tomorrow night. keep your eyes on the texans. a harbinger of things to come.
 

aria

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,543
Reaction score
16,793
who will we lose next year so that dak can be signed. the texans got rid of deandre hopkins who they knew they wouldn't be able to afford and got a used up rb and a couple of draft picks. think that helps deseaun watson? i wouldnt bet on it.. we bring in lambo. for every credit on the ledger sheet there is a corresponding debit. i hope kc and the financially flexed mahomey run all over the texans tomorrow night. keep your eyes on the texans. a harbinger of things to come.
Hopefully zeke :)
 

John813

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,306
Reaction score
34,174
I never heard there was a percentage, interesting.

.
(b)(v)Carrying Over Room.
(b)(v)(1)

A Club may designate an amount of its current League Year Room (“Room”) to credit to its Team Salary for the next League Year by providing the NFL with written notice signed by the owner. The NFL must be in receipt of this notice prior to 4:00 pm New York Time (“NYT”) on the day following the Club’s final regular season game (“Carry Over Measuring Date”). The NFL shall promptly provide a copy of any such notice to the NFLPA.

(b)(v)(2)
This notice must identify the amount of the Club’s Room (expressed in dollars or as a percentage of its Room at the conclusion of the Club’s final regular season game) that the Club intends to Carry Over to the next League Year. In the event that a Club designates an amount exceeding its Room at the conclusion of the Club’s final regular season game, such notice shall be automatically amended to reflect the Club’s entire Room at that time.

(b)(v)(3)
If a Club provides such notice, then at 4:00 pm NYT on the Carry Over Measuring Date, there will be an additional charge to that Club’s current League Year Team Salary corresponding to the amount of Room it has designated to Carry Over to the next League Year. The Club will receive an equivalent credit to its Team Salary for the following League Year. (For example, and without limitation, if one week before its final regular season game a Club possessing $5 million in Room provides notice to the NFL of its intent to Carry Over $5 million in Room to the next League Year, and if at the conclusion of the Club’s final regular season game the Club has $4 million in Room, then the Club’s notice shall be automatically amended to reflect a $4 million designation. As a result, at 4:00 pm NYT on the Carry Over Measuring Date, the Club shall: (i) be charged $4 million to its current League Year Team Salary; (ii) have no Room for the remainder of the current League Year; and (iii) be credited $4 million to its Team Salary for the following League Year (i.e., increasing the Club’s Room in the following League Year). As another example, and without limitation, if one week before its final regular season game a Club possessing $5 million in Room provides notice to the NFL of its intent to Carry Over $5 million in Room to the next League Year, and if at the conclusion of the Club’s final regular season game the Club has $7 million in Room, then the Club’s notice shall not be amended and its designation shall remain $5 million. As a result, at 4:00 pm NYT on the Carry Over Measuring Date, the Club shall: (i) be charged $5 million to its current League Year Team Salary; (ii) have $2 million in Room; and (iii) be credited $5 million to its Team Salary for the following League Year. Alternatively, if the same Club had designated 100% of its Room to Carry Over (rather than $5 million), then it would instead: (i) be charged $7 million to its current League Year Team Salary; (ii) have no Room for the remainder of the current League Year; and (iii) be credited $7 million to its Team Salary for the following League Year.)

(b)(v)(4)
The amount of any Room Carry Over pursuant to this Section shall be taken into account in the year-end netting of incentives described in Section 6(c)(ii) and (iii) of this Article.

(b)(v)(5)
Nothing in this Section shall affect the Guaranteed League-Wide Cash Spending or Minimum Team Cash Spending provisions set forth in Article 12.
 

blueblood70

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,734
Reaction score
27,009
I am mocking the Cowboys depth chart released yesterday that had him listed as the starting RDE.
well either way we know he will be jammed in te middle all season , far too much talent to rotate at DE this season..im curious if Mccoy doesnt get hurt does the DC ask for a pay cut or he doesnt even make the team? he was saved once again..
 

jazzcat22

Staff member
Messages
77,426
Reaction score
96,129
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Yes, because we need that space for next year direly.

We are borrowing from '22, '23, '24 for '21 CAP

More like preparing for if the cap decreases next year as predicted. Smart move, has nothing to do with borrowing from the future years. You can't do that. Still have to be under the cap no matter what.
 

cern

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,900
Reaction score
21,050
crawford is trysten hill's backup. but he makes a lot more money. something is wrong with this equation.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
75,480
Reaction score
69,937
who will we lose next year so that dak can be signed. the texans got rid of deandre hopkins who they knew they wouldn't be able to afford and got a used up rb and a couple of draft picks. think that helps deseaun watson? i wouldnt bet on it.. we bring in lambo. for every credit on the ledger sheet there is a corresponding debit. i hope kc and the financially flexed mahomey run all over the texans tomorrow night. keep your eyes on the texans. a harbinger of things to come.
No that's crap. They got rid of Hopkins because he wanted to be the highest paid receiver and they didn't want to do that. Honestly their coach didn't like Hopkins. That's just what it comes down to. Hopkins was under contract for 3 more years......
 
Top