Your opinion on signing Earl Thomas after week 1

I wish the NFL would rule on his contract grievance with the Ravens. His $10 million was guaranteed for 2020 but the Ravens are trying to get out of the guarantee.

That contract does have offset language so if the NFL rules the Ravens have to honor the $10 million guarantee, they would get reimbursed any amount Thomas’ new team would pay him up to that amount.

Thomas could really take a minimum contract with a new team and stick the Ravens with his guaranteed salary if the NFL rules in his favor, but since the $10 million is in limbo, Thomas may be trying to get a new team to give him as high of a contract as possible in case the Ravens are able to escape paying him his $10 million guaranteed.




I doubt that Thomas will win that fight. NO guaranteed contract is still guaranteed if the reason for being released is for violating any league or team rules. He broke two rules. He displayed conduct detrimental to team unity when he missed team meetings and also blew some off. This year in the first couple days of camp he argued with coaches and the second rule he broke was when he sucker punched a team mate. He was cut for disciplinary reasons not for play which would have been guaranteed.
.
.
 
I dont care bout the guaranteed $$ bring him in early and put language in the deal to protect yourself. Should have been signed asap. If anyone feels good about x woods and darian thompson starting you are insane
 
My question is "will they" not "should they" sign him.


I don't think waiting until after week 1 is an issue.

They could sign him to a Greg Hardy type contract where the majority of the pay is from a weekly bonus.

Example:
Salary: 1M
Per Game Bonus: 500K

That's 9M total but only 1M is guaranteed.

If they waited until after week 1, then 25% of his salary is still guaranteed.
- If the contract was 8M, then 2M would be guaranteed.

I don't think they're interested in ET at this point.

I think that would only change if they lose game 1 with the top problem being the play of the Safeties and even then it still seems unlikely.
I hope we sign him. He can bring a toughness and bully attitude to our defense.
 
My question is "will they" not "should they" sign him.


I don't think waiting until after week 1 is an issue.

They could sign him to a Greg Hardy type contract where the majority of the pay is from a weekly bonus.

Example:
Salary: 1M
Per Game Bonus: 500K

That's 9M total but only 1M is guaranteed.

If they waited until after week 1, then 25% of his salary is still guaranteed.
- If the contract was 8M, then 2M would be guaranteed.

I don't think they're interested in ET at this point.

I think that would only change if they lose game 1 with the top problem being the play of the Safeties and even then it still seems unlikely.
i believe they will after getting a true glimpse iof the actual DB play today..
 
I dont care bout the guaranteed $$ bring him in early and put language in the deal to protect yourself. Should have been signed asap. If anyone feels good about x woods and darian thompson starting you are insane




Funny, not ha ha funny, that no other team is interested in him. If he's as good as you think he still is the Cowboys aren't the only team that needs better safeties yet he's still unsigned. Maybe, just maybe it's because he's a head case now and no team wants that.
.
.
 
First that 25% if signed after week 1 is if later they are cut and that 25% only pertains to his salary and not any bonus money not guaranteed. That 1mil salary or 66.66K per week for 15 weeks and say after week 6 he gets cut the Cowboys would be on the hook for only 16.66K for those last 11 weeks or 183.3K total.

That being said, I very seriously doubt the Cowboys are interested in signing him because of his personal quirks he's developed the past couple of years. His being late for meetings or just blowing them off and his constant arguing with coaches and his sucker punching a team mate.
.
.
It is 25% of the season's salary.

If he signs for 8M salary with no guaranteed money, then 25% is 2M is cut.

If he signs for 1M plus 7M bonus money, then it's 7M + 25% of 1M = 7.25M if cut.

If he signs a Greg Hardy type contract then it's 1M salary plus 500K per game.
- Even if they did that deal before the season, then only 1M is guaranteed.

Summary: There is no advantage to waiting until after week 1 to sign Earl Thomas.
 
It is 25% of the season's salary.

If he signs for 8M salary with no guaranteed money, then 25% is 2M is cut.

If he signs for 1M plus 7M bonus money, then it's 7M + 25% of 1M = 7.25M if cut.

If he signs a Greg Hardy type contract then it's 1M salary plus 500K per game.
- Even if they did that deal before the season, then only 1M is guaranteed.

Summary: There is no advantage to waiting until after week 1 to sign Earl Thomas.




I was referring to the 1 mil contract but if it's signed before the season the entire salary is 100% guaranteed. The 25% only comes into play if the contract is sign after week 1 and then released later. Like I said if the bonus money isn't guaranteed then the 25% doesn't apply to that.
.
.
 
It is 25% of the season's salary.

If he signs for 8M salary with no guaranteed money, then 25% is 2M is cut.

If he signs for 1M plus 7M bonus money, then it's 7M + 25% of 1M = 7.25M if cut.

If he signs a Greg Hardy type contract then it's 1M salary plus 500K per game.
- Even if they did that deal before the season, then only 1M is guaranteed.

Summary: There is no advantage to waiting until after week 1 to sign Earl Thomas.
Thank you. Everyone knows you can structure the deal to protect yourself if thats what you are looking to do
 
Thank you. Everyone knows you can structure the deal to protect yourself if thats what you are looking to do

The posts at CZ on the topic suggest that many people don't know that the team could "protect themselves" without having to wait until after week 1.
 
My question is "will they" not "should they" sign him.


I don't think waiting until after week 1 is an issue.

They could sign him to a Greg Hardy type contract where the majority of the pay is from a weekly bonus.

Example:
Salary: 1M
Per Game Bonus: 500K

That's 9M total but only 1M is guaranteed.

If they waited until after week 1, then 25% of his salary is still guaranteed.
- If the contract was 8M, then 2M would be guaranteed.

I don't think they're interested in ET at this point.

I think that would only change if they lose game 1 with the top problem being the play of the Safeties and even then it still seems unlikely.
Do it. I heard somewhere he's bipolar. If that's true, it explains his behavior. Bipolarism is treatable.
 
Tonight's spotlight on xavier woods and some other guy. Que sera, sera.
 
So you saying, leave it up to Brandon Carr?

The problem with Thomas is uncertainty. Carr can provide information to limit that uncertainty. He could also lie to us.

If trusted, Carr's input may or may reduce their uncertainty, and may or may not push them over the top to want to sign Thomas or not sign Thomas. But I'd ask for Carr's input and I'd trust him that he's giving his honest assessment.
 
The problem with Thomas is uncertainty. Carr can provide information to limit that uncertainty. He could also lie to us.

If trusted, Carr's input may or may reduce their uncertainty, and may or may not push them over the top to want to sign Thomas or not sign Thomas. But I'd ask for Carr's input and I'd trust him that he's giving his honest assessment.
I predict ET is signed by us by Wed.
 
My question is "will they" not "should they" sign him.


I don't think waiting until after week 1 is an issue.

They could sign him to a Greg Hardy type contract where the majority of the pay is from a weekly bonus.

Example:
Salary: 1M
Per Game Bonus: 500K

That's 9M total but only 1M is guaranteed.

If they waited until after week 1, then 25% of his salary is still guaranteed.
- If the contract was 8M, then 2M would be guaranteed.

I don't think they're interested in ET at this point.

I think that would only change if they lose game 1 with the top problem being the play of the Safeties and even then it still seems unlikely.




I think they will sign him. I hope they pay him a very good incentive laden salary for 1 season. I really feel Earl thomas puts this team on anyone's level. The good thing is after week 1, He isnt guaranteed his contract. sign him to a great 1 year deal and let's try to win this thing
 
Jerry and Stephen should discuss this with the team or at least with the leaders on the team. They shouldn't sign him without the team's blessing. And i don't really know, maybe they have discussed it. I just think that making the team part of the decision process would go a long way towards accountability and the team accepting responsibility for the actions of individual players.
 
My question is "will they" not "should they" sign him.


I don't think waiting until after week 1 is an issue.

They could sign him to a Greg Hardy type contract where the majority of the pay is from a weekly bonus.

Example:
Salary: 1M
Per Game Bonus: 500K

That's 9M total but only 1M is guaranteed.

If they waited until after week 1, then 25% of his salary is still guaranteed.
- If the contract was 8M, then 2M would be guaranteed.

I don't think they're interested in ET at this point.

I think that would only change if they lose game 1 with the top problem being the play of the Safeties and even then it still seems unlikely.
Agreed.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,529
Messages
14,543,128
Members
24,212
Latest member
JerryJonesSupporter
Back
Top