phildadon86
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 21,810
- Reaction score
- 31,116
Draft Lawrence and still lose games 48-31. lol GREAT IDEA.If we throw all our eggs into the new QB basket and not the O line and D line expect David Carr 2.0
Draft Lawrence and still lose games 48-31. lol GREAT IDEA.If we throw all our eggs into the new QB basket and not the O line and D line expect David Carr 2.0
Dak has already come out and said publicly he doesnt deserve to paid as the highest paid in the league. This whole Dak is greedy mantra has already been debunked countless times.
If we were smart...
He said no to the amount of years. And then on top of that agreed to the years and said no because Jerry wouldnt agree to not franchise him again. Try and keep up.Yet he said no to everything short of it.
IT does though why on earth would they trade the 1st overall pick for Dak? And I like Dak but he has no contract....and why on earth would Dak re-sign with the Cowboys in order to get traded to the Jets and ruin his career? This makes no sense at all lol.I think we keep Dak, but what he says isn’t entirely crazy.
Draft Lawrence and still lose games 48-31. lol GREAT IDEA.
There are no free agents out there though lol....everyone is locked up...Cowboys need pass rushers and linebackers........Lawrence + 40mil/yr vs. Dak + our 1st round pick
That's what the trade off is looking like now. Though it's complicated by an impending drop in the cap, which should hammer free agent contracts next year from both ends. Cap goes down, dropping generally payscale, whie *existing* contracts are all scaled to previous projections of the cap, leaving free agents with *less* that their usual percentage of the cap.
Next year, cash should be king. Should be a buyers market for free agents. Good time *not* to have 40mil tied up in a QB.
If I were Lawrence I'd refuse to play for the Cowboys until they hired a real GM. Why let his career get wasted by the Jones' buffoons? Same with the Jets and a few other randoms that are horribly managed.
Why, is there a rule that a team taking Lawrence is forbidden from then improving their defense?
They are so smart they are dumb lol.Draft Lawrence and still lose games 48-31. lol GREAT IDEA.
If we throw all our eggs into the new QB basket and not the O line and D line expect David Carr 2.0
They already have a hell of a QB, that’s why they’re going to pay Dak what he deserves!That is what this team needs. Save the money that Dak thinks he deserves and use it for the team and get a hell of a QB.
He said no to the amount of years. And then on top of that agreed to the years and said no because Jerry wouldnt agree to not franchise him again. Try and keep up.
dang, the stats prescott slobbers are getting scared.
I’m all caught up. They kept offering twice what he is truly worth and he kept saying no. The other crap is excuses and fluff. He gambled once to often and I hope it costs him his job in Dallas because he isn’t worth it. He’s a great guy but not worth the money.
Hey, no cracks about him looking like a girl!
If they just tag Prescott and the cap falls to 175M, that's 20% of the cap to one player. Can they afford to do that or do they take a shot at Lawrence for whatever the #1 pick will cost them over the 4 years + option year?
The offense is set for a player like Lawrence to step in just like Prescott did when he was a rookie; however, the OL must get solid. Lawrence knows he'll struggle just like Darnold did but in Dallas, he could step into a rookie QB's best situation of the high pickers.
Then they can use the savings at QB on some badly needed D help and of course I am making assumptions here.
I have watched almost all of Lawrence's games and while he's not perfect, the team losses nothing by him taking over and he's a good athlete and runner and 6'6" mitigating as many blocked throws at the line.
The ancillary benefit to the team is they send the message, balk too much at negotiating and it's adios.