Goff traded for Stafford

[phildadon86]

Holy crap.

Still think he’s worth it @CATCH17 ? Just curious if this shows you how valuable QBs are. Even ones who don’t win games with bad backs.

 

[acr731]

The same number as Dan Marino and one less than Trent Dilfer.

At least Marino played in a super bowl.

 

[rnr_honeybadger]

I mean, the one time he was injured, our offense grinded to a halt and we endured the most embarrassing season since the one that led to us drafting Dak in the first place, so...

Not like said offense was doing much winning before he went out.

 

[Gaede]

Dak Record as Dallas QB by Year

2016: 13-3 0-1 in playoffs
2017: 9-7
2018: 10-6 1-1 in playoffs
2019: 8-8
2020: 2-3

Yeah, that is a lot of elevating going on right there.

Lol did you see what happened without him?

 

[Gaede]

Not like said offense was doing much winning before he went out.

A small portion of the season. He was putting up record numbers that somehow immediately stopped once he was out of the lineup

 

[USArmyVet]

I mean, the one time he was injured, our offense grinded to a halt and we endured the most embarrassing season since the one that led to us drafting Dak in the first place, so...

2020 Dallas Cowboys Record...

...with Prescott 2-3
....with Dalton 4-5
...with Danucci 0-1
....with Gilbert 0-1

So based on win % Dalton did better than Dak with the most embarrassing season.

 

[rnr_honeybadger]

A small portion of the season. He was putting up record numbers that somehow immediately stopped once he was out of the lineup

Putting up numbers that meant nothing. 4 of the five teams he faced this year had horrible defenses and the one good defense he faced he couldn’t get this “juggernaut offense” to 20 points.

 

[USArmyVet]

Lol did you see what happened without him?

Yes, Dallas went for 4-5 with Dalton after going 2-3 with Dak.....so if the result is the same or slightly better with Dalton then why pay Dak?????

 

[rnr_honeybadger]

Yes, Dallas went for 4-5 with Dalton after going 2-3 with Dak.....so if the result is the same or slightly better with Dalton then why pay Dak?????

But but Dak threw for 500 yards and sleeps on a sleep number bed

 

[Gaede]

2020 Dallas Cowboys Record...

...with Prescott 2-3
....with Dalton 4-5
...with Danucci 0-1
....with Gilbert 0-1

So based on win % Dalton did better than Dak with the most embarrassing season.

He got to compete against the likes of Brandon Allen, so not exactly apples and apples here.

Like, how much spinning do you have to do for yourself to have endured that shitshow last year and somehow come away with the idea that Dalton was better than Dak?

 

[USArmyVet]

But but Dak threw for 500 yards and sleeps on a sleep number bed

Don't forget the newly signed beer endorsement deal....now Dak can continue to throw his Covid parties and sleep easy knowing he passed for 500 yards in spite of his team losing.

 

[Bullflop]

Now, that's going out on a limb! It'll be beyond interesting to see if that trade gets them to a Super Bowl -- they'd better hope it does!

 

[tyke1doe]

But but Dak threw for 500 yards and sleeps on a sleep number bed

 

[USArmyVet]

He got to compete against the likes of Brandon Allen, so not exactly apples and apples here.

Like, how much spinning do you have to do for yourself to have endured that shitshow last year and somehow come away with the idea that Dalton was better than Dak?

Statistics said Dalton won at a better rate than Dak. Did I say Dalton was better than Dak? No. I simply am pointing out the fact that what is the point paying Dak a huge contract if his "passing records" can't elevate the team?

 

[Qcard]

Statistics said Dalton won at a better rate than Dak. Did I say Dalton was better than Dak? No. I simply am pointing out the fact that what is the point paying Dak a huge contract if his "passing records" can't elevate the team?

The New Goal Post??

Dalton won at a better Rate

 

[Gaede]

Statistics said Dalton won at a better rate than Dak. Did I say Dalton was better than Dak? No. I simply am pointing out the fact that what is the point paying Dak a huge contract if his "passing records" can't elevate the team?

Ok cool. I get it. Now that Dak has established himself as the prolific passer you all said he would never become, what really matters is the team's overall record. A number that meant diddly squat to all of you when Dak had one of the winningest records among starting QBs but didn't have the prolific passing numbers.

 

[Established1971]

I can't recall another time two starting quarterbacks were traded for each other since way back to my first full year watching in 1972 when Fran Tarkenton was traded for Norm Snead. Have there been any other cases of this in between these?

 

[USArmyVet]

The New Goal Post??

Dalton won at a better Rate

You can shove your same stupid 'goal post' comment up your endzone. You use that crap line and your crap video links all the time as you do not have any original thoughts or ability to defend the defenseless which is Dak.

 

[Qcard]

Ok cool. I get it. Now that Dak has established himself as the prolific passer you all said he would never become, what really matters is the team's overall record. A number that meant diddly squat to all of you when Dak had one of the winningest records among starting QBs but didn't have the prolific passing numbers.

Audible Check check Omaha Omaha...shift Goal Post

Better win rate on 3!


Dak Haters are Merciless

 

[USArmyVet]

Ok cool. I get it. Now that Dak has established himself as the prolific passer you all said he would never become, what really matters is the team's overall record. A number that meant diddly squat to all of you when Dak had one of the winningest records among starting QBs but didn't have the prolific passing numbers.

Last time I checked winning is what QB's are paid to do, not just put up personal stats. I think most on here would agree that if Dak passed for 200 yards a game but Dallas was winning and getting deep into the playoffs then pay Dak.....but to put up personal stats while the team loses then why pay him?