phildadon86
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 21,921
- Reaction score
- 31,280
Holy crap.
Still think he’s worth it @CATCH17 ? Just curious if this shows you how valuable QBs are. Even ones who don’t win games with bad backs.
Holy crap.
The same number as Dan Marino and one less than Trent Dilfer.
I mean, the one time he was injured, our offense grinded to a halt and we endured the most embarrassing season since the one that led to us drafting Dak in the first place, so...
Dak Record as Dallas QB by Year
2016: 13-3 0-1 in playoffs
2017: 9-7
2018: 10-6 1-1 in playoffs
2019: 8-8
2020: 2-3
Yeah, that is a lot of elevating going on right there.
Not like said offense was doing much winning before he went out.
I mean, the one time he was injured, our offense grinded to a halt and we endured the most embarrassing season since the one that led to us drafting Dak in the first place, so...
A small portion of the season. He was putting up record numbers that somehow immediately stopped once he was out of the lineup
Lol did you see what happened without him?
But but Dak threw for 500 yards and sleeps on a sleep number bedYes, Dallas went for 4-5 with Dalton after going 2-3 with Dak.....so if the result is the same or slightly better with Dalton then why pay Dak?????
2020 Dallas Cowboys Record...
...with Prescott 2-3
....with Dalton 4-5
...with Danucci 0-1
....with Gilbert 0-1
So based on win % Dalton did better than Dak with the most embarrassing season.
But but Dak threw for 500 yards and sleeps on a sleep number bed
But but Dak threw for 500 yards and sleeps on a sleep number bed
He got to compete against the likes of Brandon Allen, so not exactly apples and apples here.
Like, how much spinning do you have to do for yourself to have endured that shitshow last year and somehow come away with the idea that Dalton was better than Dak?
The New Goal Post??Statistics said Dalton won at a better rate than Dak. Did I say Dalton was better than Dak? No. I simply am pointing out the fact that what is the point paying Dak a huge contract if his "passing records" can't elevate the team?
Statistics said Dalton won at a better rate than Dak. Did I say Dalton was better than Dak? No. I simply am pointing out the fact that what is the point paying Dak a huge contract if his "passing records" can't elevate the team?
The New Goal Post??
Dalton won at a better Rate
Audible Check check Omaha Omaha...shift Goal PostOk cool. I get it. Now that Dak has established himself as the prolific passer you all said he would never become, what really matters is the team's overall record. A number that meant diddly squat to all of you when Dak had one of the winningest records among starting QBs but didn't have the prolific passing numbers.
Ok cool. I get it. Now that Dak has established himself as the prolific passer you all said he would never become, what really matters is the team's overall record. A number that meant diddly squat to all of you when Dak had one of the winningest records among starting QBs but didn't have the prolific passing numbers.