I don't think anyone is suggesting the Cowboys spend $100 million in free agency. I think what most of us are saying is that you cannot get better unless you get better players. Signing Dak was great, but even with Dak last year how many games did the Cowboys win? 1, because the Falcons, coached by the new DC, didn't understand the rule about onside kick recovery.
The Cowboys came into this season with two glaring needs from last year (and the year before and the year before that). DT and S. Then because they lost a CB to Free agency they need bodies for the secondary. This draft has CBs, and a couple of safeties in reach with the Cowboys first 2 draft picks. But there are no impact DTs. So would it be asking too much to sign one in free agency who is better than what they already have on the roster? I know I never suggested they go crazy in free agency. I even suggested just signing 1 free agent from outside instead of 5 K-Mart specials.
I think the strategy of building through the draft alone is flawed and cannot possibly work because other teams do play in free agency and they will sign your players away if you cant or wont pay them. If you draft 3 starters a year, and I mean quality starters not just guys that can start for a bad team, in 4 years you have 12 starters. After 4 years, some of your guys are leaving via free agency so the building never ends. The idea of combining all the tools you have to build a roster is not crazy. You draft, trade and use free agency to improve. It is not all of one or the other. The Cowboys simply close off the option of signing free agents. It makes no sense.