Things could change after Friday and Saturday

To me his play and testing numbers make him a good pick in the 20's. If I am the Cowboys, I would consider him in a trade back from 10 or a trade up from 44. It is worth the risk to them because he could be outstanding on the edge.

I’m guilty of it myself, but I think too many people lose the human element of things when evaluating these prospects. And obviously it’s easy to do when you’re simply reading scouting reports and watching a tiny bit of game tape.

Bottom line is if we held every person accountable for an emotional decision they made when they were 19, how many people are left employable?
 
I’m guilty of it myself, but I think too many people lose the human element of things when evaluating these prospects. And obviously it’s easy to do when you’re simply reading scouting reports and watching a tiny bit of game tape.

Bottom line is if we held every person accountable for an emotional decision they made when they were 19, how many people are left employable?
Yep, he is making up for his mistake with his play this season and his work ethic that produced those excellent testing numbers.
 
I don't think he will last to 44. I'm thinking that he will go in the first round. Dane Brugler has him ranked 22. I've got him at 15 on my board. I'm really impressed with him.
I don't think he will either.
 
I don't think he will either.
I'm thinking that Pitts, Sewell, Slater, or Surtain at 10 followed by a trade up from 44 to get Phillips would be a good way to go. If they don't take a corner up there they could sign a veteran free agent to cover them for a year and maybe draft a guy like Paulson Adebo later.
 
Do they get tested for Weed? If so somebody big going to pop positive...
 
Do they get tested for Weed? If so somebody big going to pop positive...
Haven't they changed their rules? It is so stupid that they had that anti weed thing, when they have been shooting up players with narcotics for over half a century and covered up the head injuries that have been putting players in their graves.
 
I'm thinking that Pitts, Sewell, Slater, or Surtain at 10 followed by a trade up from 44 to get Phillips would be a good way to go. If they don't take a corner up there they could sign a veteran free agent to cover them for a year and maybe draft a guy like Paulson Adebo later.
i agree with you. If all 4 of those guys are there at 10(highly unlikely) than I am going with Pitts.
 
*Jerry rubs his hands together maniacally*
So you're saying he could be had in the second?

I think you are right. This was a pic taken by local media of Jerry and Stephen, earlier, after reading the tweet from Riddick.

fe53305c7e1bf15df97a7ae278af7aa9.png
 
i agree with you. If all 4 of those guys are there at 10(highly unlikely) than I am going with Pitts.
I'd go with Pitts no matter what, if he is there I would take him. If Sewell is there and Pitts is gone I would take Sewell. If both are gone, I would consider Slater, Surtain, or Horn and would consider trading back to 13 or 15. On a trade back, I would consider Parsons, Horn, Jaelan Phillips, or even Teven Jenkins.
 
Do they get tested for Weed? If so somebody big going to pop positive...
They take a piss test or DNA analysis either way positive test wil probably be on the report it just means they wont go into the protocol.
 


Didn’t realize the medical evaluation process was happening like this. Not only could we find about medical red flags that drastically changes things, but with only 2 personnel from each team allowed I gotta imagine they will be meeting with a limited # of prospects. Wonder if these vists/evaluations get leaked narrowing down who teams are truly interested in?

Should be interesting
Wonder if most players have issues after a lifetime of playing a violent sport?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
465,966
Messages
13,907,513
Members
23,793
Latest member
Roger33
Back
Top