Giants and eagles

Adiba1977

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,819
Reaction score
4,570
Picking right after us kinda weird and annoying. Who do they want? Eagles probably want wr or line backer? Looking like one them might get parson or waddle? That gonna suck.
 
Both are terrible and won’t be good next year. Go Cowboys.
 
Adiba1977 said:
Picking right after us kinda weird and annoying. Who do they want? Eagles probably want wr or line backer? Looking like one them might get parson or waddle? That gonna suck.
Click to expand...

I'm guessing the giants draft Waddle and the eagles trade up to 9 and pick Surtain.

The giants are going to be a good team next year. They are the sleeper. Their offense is going to be just fine. And how bad was their D last year? Not that bad of I remember correctly.
 
people are overlooking that the Iggles oline is a hot mess. Their starting left tackle Jason Peters is what 40? Coming off of being injured, and retired then unretired during the season last year lol...They also have glaring needs along the oline other than tackle. Philly likely traded down in hopes of drafting a tackle. Do nor rule out Slater or Darrisaw for them at 12. The Giants could easily draft Pitts if we pass on him. In fact, safe to say they would. They have a need at TE/wr and he would fill both.
 
timb2 said:
I have

Giants- Azeez Ojulari

Eagles- Christian Barmore
Click to expand...
love Barmore but they have much bigger needs to fill at 12. Philly needs cb and oline badly. If Horn is there, he will be the pick..but if hes gone they would go oline like Darrisaw or Slater. Giants needs are many still.
 
Rayman70 said:
people are overlooking that the Iggles oline is a hot mess. Their starting left tackle Jason Peters is what 40? Coming off of being injured, and retired then unretired during the season last year lol...They also have glaring needs along the oline other than tackle. Philly likely traded down in hopes of drafting a tackle. Do nor rule out Slater or Darrisaw for them at 12. The Giants could easily draft Pitts if we pass on him. In fact, safe to say they would. They have a need at TE/wr and he would fill both.
Click to expand...
Peters isn't their starting LT. He was signed to play Guard to replace Brooks who was out over the season. When Dillard went down, he shifted to LT. It's unlikely the Eagles will be targeting OL as they need offensive skilled players along with a LB and a CB.
 
Rayman70 said:
people are overlooking that the Iggles oline is a hot mess. Their starting left tackle Jason Peters is what 40? Coming off of being injured, and retired then unretired during the season last year lol...They also have glaring needs along the oline other than tackle. Philly likely traded down in hopes of drafting a tackle. Do nor rule out Slater or Darrisaw for them at 12. The Giants could easily draft Pitts if we pass on him. In fact, safe to say they would. They have a need at TE/wr and he would fill both.
Click to expand...

Both OLines are a hot mess. Giants haven't had a good line in several years and let their best graded OL go. They probably hope Slater falls to them. They have had weapons they can't use because they can't open holes or keep a clean pocket imo.
 
HanD said:
Both OLines are a hot mess. Giants haven't had a good line in several years and let their best graded OL go. They probably hope Slater falls to them. They have had weapons they can't use because they can't open holes or keep a clean pocket imo.
Click to expand...
agree..People think its a forgone conclusion that they know what Philly might do, but I dont see them getting a corner at 12. They could have stayed put if that was what they had there eye on ahead of us at 10. The giants on the other hand have holes up front like you said, but seeing how Garrett is there, he would love to stick it to us by getting Pitts. But with philly, I think they badly want an olineman. I see Slater falling to them if we pass on him.They could plug him in day 1 and it helps them.
 
Cowboyny said:
Peters isn't their starting LT. He was signed to play Guard to replace Brooks who was out over the season. When Dillard went down, he shifted to LT. It's unlikely the Eagles will be targeting OL as they need offensive skilled players along with a LB and a CB.
Click to expand...
yes BUT they can land plenty skilled players later. They could nab Toney in round 2 just as well.
 
Peters started at tackle for them for many years and yes he plays guard too. The moral of the story is the guy is pushing 40 and been hurt alot. I highly doubt they want to press their luck and bypass a great tackle like Slater at 12. If hes there you take him.
 
Rayman70 said:
yes BUT they can land plenty skilled players later. They could nab Toney in round 2 just as well.
Click to expand...
They are loaded within the OL, they just had mass injuries last season, kind of like the Cowboys, but their starters are far younger.
 
Crazed Liotta Eyes said:
Hopefully we snag whoever they wanted. Getting Lamb before the Eagles was probably the most satisfying moment in a disappointing last season.
Click to expand...
Did you see the Eagles fans reactions on YouTube after we took Lamb?
If you haven't you are really missing out.
I would post them here but as you would expect. Lots of profanity.
I would love to see some more Eagle meltdown videos again after this draft.
 
Cowboyny said:
They are loaded within the OL, they just had mass injuries last season, kind of like the Cowboys, but their starters are far younger.
Click to expand...
they been sending many scouts and coaches to these olinemen pro days. Where their is smoke theres fire. Why else would you trade down? They could have had their pick of wr's in the top 10. I think they are focused on other needs first.
 
Hardline said:
Did you see the Eagles fans reactions on YouTube after we took Lamb?
If you haven't you are really missing out.
I would post them here but as you would expect. Lots of profanity.
I would love to see some more Eagle meltdown videos again after this draft.
Click to expand...
if we get Pitts it will be epic to watch them lol. Roseman might be ran out of town on a rail.
 
Rayman70 said:
they been sending many scouts and coaches to these olinemen pro days. Where their is smoke theres fire. Why else would you trade down? They could have had their pick of wr's in the top 10. I think they are focused on other needs first.
Click to expand...
Why trade away from Sewell or Slater? They might be targeting a LB or CB.
 
Cowboyny said:
They are loaded within the OL, they just had mass injuries last season, kind of like the Cowboys, but their starters are far younger.
Click to expand...
loaded? Maybe some but like you said, they had some key injuries and couple that with Peters' age and how he's been hurt alot, I cant see them passing on a guy like Slater or Darrisaw at 12. That would fix their oline day 1. Gives them great quality and depth as well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Staff online

Members online

Total: 3,054 (members: 75, guests: 2,979)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
465,966
Messages
13,907,525
Members
23,793
Latest member
Roger33
Back
Top