Come on, man. You’re normally a sensible poster, but there’s no way to spin that as anything other than derogatory. By your standard, one could call Mike Tomlin “Black Mike” and that’s perfectly acceptable because it’s a “fact.”Thats not an insult, he is fat
Insult would be telling him he’s a modicum of physical health
No, there’s not. But let’s not pretend what the almost universal intent of using that moniker would be. Or maybe more correctly, what the perception is of using that moniker. Perception is quite often way more important than fact.But there’s nothing wrong with being black
No, there’s not. But let’s not pretend what the almost universal intent of using that moniker would be. Or maybe more correctly, what the perception is of using that moniker. Perception is quite often way more important than fact.
You didn’t. But the post you replied to was taking umbrage with another poster that did. You essentially were defending the initial poster by pointing out it was a “fact.” That someone has to qualify calling McCarthy Fat Mike instead of Coach McCarthy cannot be construed as anything but a derogatory statement. And posting herein referring to him as “morbidly obese Mike” instead of Coach Mike, although factual and somewhat less offensive, still shades towards the unnecessary.But I never called him fat mike, that’s not apples to apples.
he’s grossly obese, and no one is pretending he’s not
You didn’t. But the post you replied to was taking umbrage with another poster that did. You essentially were defending the initial poster by pointing out it was a “fact.” That someone has to qualify calling McCarthy Fat Mike instead of Coach McCarthy cannot be construed as anything but a derogatory statement. And posting herein referring to him as “morbidly obese Mike” instead of Coach Mike, although factual and somewhat less offensive, still shades towards the unnecessary.
I agree with Cable.I’d say Garrett, WADE AND Campo.....
You probably still have a closet full of zingers you want to unload.Bring back Garrett!
A few sex toy's too!You probably still have a closet full of zingers you want to unload.
To me Garrett was here probably 3 years longer than he should've...but I also understand 2016 probably bought him more time than it should've.....but had he been fired midseason over 2019 it wouldn't have shocked me and I wouldn't have been upset.I agree with Cable.
I believe that you believe that.This is silly. He’s closer to COTY than to getting fired. He’s just getting started and last year was a wash.
Garrett sucks.... never deserved to be here. Can't stand his pompous and arrogant butt!!! Other than that, he ok.To me Garrett was here probably 3 years longer than he should've...but I also understand 2016 probably bought him more time than it should've.....but had he been fired midseason over 2019 it wouldn't have shocked me and I wouldn't have been upset.
*Specimen , I do so believe there ,BROUGHAM'S rather than that one you'd chosen to utilize, of Health, would've been much more powerful in it's intent of impactful impartation upon the targeted captives*Thats not an insult, he is fat
Insult would be telling him he’s a modicum of physical health
You're playing with words but not fooling anybody. "His fatness" is clearly derogatory name calling which is not OK.Truth is okay. Lie is not
I believe that you believe that.
Pretty sure the rest of the league sees MM as JG: an outdated coach in a sea of innovative young minds.
I gave MM the benefit of the doubt when he was hired, but I thought that he had the ability to prove he was better than Garrett. His in in-game decisions was worse than Garrett and those decisions supported the claims that Rodgers about about MM having a very low football IQ.