News: Ezekiel Elliot sued again for yet another dog attack

[Aerolithe_Lion]

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2021/06/05/ezekiel-elliott-sued-for-another-dog-attack/

This one is a little weird. Sounds like he had his dogs in the kennel and the dogs attacked their handler…. Would that then be suing for mis-training of the animals? Or perhaps failure to announce the dogs have a history?

This comes almost exactly a year after his previous lawsuit over an attack….

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2020/06/26/ezekiel-elliott-sued-over-alleged-dog-attack/

And then the third attack was just last month….

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.c...otts-dogs-send-two-to-hospital-with-injuries/

…although the new suit looks like it happened before that one, so last month’s could have a suit coming too.

 

[JoeKing]

He's just not a good dog owner. An official investigation is warranted. I hope we aren't looking at a situation like what happened to Mike Vick.

 

[John813]

Odd case. Feel like the lawsuit is filed only cause the owner is rich

 

[Aerolithe_Lion]

He's just not a good dog owner. An official investigation is warranted. I hope we aren't looking at a situation like what happened to Mike Vick.

I think it’s just negligence. I’m a big proponent of raising guard dogs with a mean streak, but you have to care for them accordingly. He raised wolves and then lets them loose on suburbia.

 

[gimmesix]

He's just not a good dog owner. An official investigation is warranted. I hope we aren't looking at a situation like what happened to Mike Vick.

That seems like a big reach. Vick was involved in dog fighting. That's different than having vicious dogs.

It seems to me that if Elliott wants to keep those dogs, he needs to hire someone to come in and work with them who knows how to make them less aggressive.

 

[DoctorChicken]

I’m going to be Elliott is gone all the time and leaves these dogs locked up all day, which makes them aggressive.

He’s just a crappy dog owner.

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

I’m going to be Elliott is gone all the time and leaves these dogs locked up all day, which makes them aggressive.

He’s just a crappy dog owner.

If he is "gone all day"...there has to be a dog sitter. Wouldn't they be at fault?

 

[Rockport]

Odd case. Feel like the lawsuit is filed only cause the owner is rich

That was my first thought. This doesn’t make sense. Rottweilers and Pit Bulls are aggressive dogs but there’s always a reason for it mainly protecting their pack and territory. This story doesn’t make sense.

 

[dcstar]

These guys are morons...some dogs are genetically wired to be aggressive and some folks don't understand that. Its not the dogs fault. I feel bad for the dog because the owner is an imbecile. If a person chooses to own a breed known for aggression...it falls on that person to be 100% responsible for safeguarding not only other people but the dog as well. Societies response is usually to euthanize the dog...the owner should also be flagged and not allowed to own a living creature again.

Aggressive breeds have a gene that causes it to snap for who knows what reason. Personally, I find it disgusting how many articles I read on the internet about young children being mauled and severely injured or worse by the family pet (ie) breeds known for aggressive behavior.

There is nothing funny about this clowns dog being involved in at least three known instances. If a person wants to own a breed known for aggressive behavior...great...then take care of it 24/7...no excuses because there is no excuse.

 

[Risen Star]

That was my first thought. This doesn’t make sense. Rottweilers and Pit Bulls are aggressive dogs but there’s always a reason for it mainly protecting their pack and territory. This story doesn’t make sense.

Okay. Now pretend he's a Commander and see if that clears it up for you.

 

[JoeKing]

That seems like a big reach. Vick was involved in dog fighting. That's different than having vicious dogs.

It seems to me that if Elliott wants to keep those dogs, he needs to hire someone to come in and work with them who knows how to make them less aggressive.

Why are his dogs so aggressive? Does he raise them that way so they can fight? It needs to be investigated.

 

[Risen Star]

These guys are morons...some dogs are genetically wired to be aggressive and some folks don't understand that. Its not the dogs fault. I feel bad for the dog because the owner is an imbecile. If a person chooses to own a breed known for aggression...it falls on that person to be 100% responsible for safeguarding not only other people but the dog as well. Societies response is usually to euthanize the dog...the owner should also be flagged and not allowed to own a living creature again.

Aggressive breeds have a gene that causes it to snap for who knows what reason. Personally, I find it disgusting how many articles I read on the internet about young children being mauled and severely injured or worse by the family pet (ie) breeds known for aggressive behavior.

There is nothing funny about this clowns dog being involved in at least three known instances. If a person wants to own a breed known for aggressive behavior...great...then take care of it 24/7...no excuses because there is no excuse.

It's Prescott, bro. Before he befriended him, Zeke used to cuddle with poodles.

 

[Rockport]

Okay. Now pretend he's a Commander and see if that clears it up for you.

Put him in jail!

 

[Risen Star]

Why are his dogs so aggressive? Does he raise them that way so they can fight? It needs to be investigated.

Investigate it. We'll be here when you discover this thing called protection.

 

[America's Cowboy]

Get rid of those killer dogs. Buy family friendly ones. Problem solved.

But the stubborn-headed wants to either look tough or he wants to turn dna-centuries-shaped killer dogs into cute little, gentle puppies, which clearly isn't working.

 

[Captain-Crash]

you can't be a gangster without the pit.

 

[Whyjerry]

The Village Idiot doing Village Idiot things.

 

[Point-of-the-Star]

Sounds like a case for Cesar Millan. Either that or the dog needs to be put down as incorrigible.

I'm not a proponent of large potentially deadly dogs. I was going to get a Kangal or Anatolian out here on the farm but decided against it due to potential liability and just flat didn't want the guilt on my conscience if something bad happened involving an innocent person.

 

[America's Cowboy]

These guys are morons...some dogs are genetically wired to be aggressive and some folks don't understand that. Its not the dogs fault. I feel bad for the dog because the owner is an imbecile. If a person chooses to own a breed known for aggression...it falls on that person to be 100% responsible for safeguarding not only other people but the dog as well. Societies response is usually to euthanize the dog...the owner should also be flagged and not allowed to own a living creature again.

Aggressive breeds have a gene that causes it to snap for who knows what reason. Personally, I find it disgusting how many articles I read on the internet about young children being mauled and severely injured or worse by the family pet (ie) breeds known for aggressive behavior.

There is nothing funny about this clowns dog being involved in at least three known instances. If a person wants to own a breed known for aggressive behavior...great...then take care of it 24/7...no excuses because there is no excuse.

BOOM!!!

The problem also is those making excuses for such irresponsible behavior.

 

[speedkilz88]

Why are his dogs so aggressive? Does he raise them that way so they can fight? It needs to be investigated.

Only one has been biting, the rottweiler.