What if 3-4 defense struggles

Dak_Attack_09

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,222
Reaction score
3,603
Last year Mike McCarthy was adamant on playing 3-4 knowing he didn’t have the time, coaches & players to do it and still wants to continue go down this road.

Dan Quinn’s success came under 4-3 defense & in Atl SB run it was 4-3 majority of the time.

My question is would you get rid of McCarthy if the defense struggles for the first quarter of the season like last year and promote Kellen Moore as the HC?

 

CowboyFrog

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,137
Reaction score
10,115
Last year Mike McCarthy was adamant on playing 3-4 knowing he didn’t have the time, coaches & players to do it and still wants to continue go down this road.

Dan Quinn’s success came under 4-3 defense & in Atl SB run it was 4-3 majority of the time.

My question is would you get rid of McCarthy if the defense struggles for the first quarter of the season like last year and promote Kellen Moore as the HC?




The problem with 3-4 vs 4-3 is your not in your base D alot anymore....our coaches need to find a way to neutralize the other offenses gameplan using the players they have. I dont (ok I hope really really hope) our players are not as bad as they looked last year and that a full TC with some new additions and a new DC shows we can be a middle of the pack defense.
 

Dak_Attack_09

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,222
Reaction score
3,603
The problem with 3-4 vs 4-3 is your not in your base D alot anymore....our coaches need to find a way to neutralize the other offenses gameplan using the players they have. I dont (ok I hope really really hope) our players are not as bad as they looked last year and that a full TC with some new additions and a new DC shows we can be a middle of the pack defense.

You are making Demarcus Lawrence & Gregory less valuable. Good thing is Bradlee Anae can play both style & dominate but in 4-3 he can have TJ Watt type of impact.
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
Last year Mike McCarthy was adamant on playing 3-4 knowing he didn’t have the time, coaches & players to do it and still wants to continue go down this road.

Dan Quinn’s success came under 4-3 defense & in Atl SB run it was 4-3 majority of the time.

My question is would you get rid of McCarthy if the defense struggles for the first quarter of the season like last year and promote Kellen Moore as the HC?



I would fully expect the defense to struggle early in the season no matter who was the new DC. So no I would not.
 

Cowboyny

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,904
Reaction score
19,110
Last year Mike McCarthy was adamant on playing 3-4 knowing he didn’t have the time, coaches & players to do it and still wants to continue go down this road.

Dan Quinn’s success came under 4-3 defense & in Atl SB run it was 4-3 majority of the time.

My question is would you get rid of McCarthy if the defense struggles for the first quarter of the season like last year and promote Kellen Moore as the HC?


We aren't running a 3-4 defense, just will look like that on the run downs.
 

Big D

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,071
Reaction score
3,735
You are making Demarcus Lawrence & Gregory less valuable. Good thing is Bradlee Anae can play both style & dominate but in 4-3 he can have TJ Watt type of impact.
I'm not trying to troll you here but what evidence do you have that brings you to believe that? Don't get me wrong I would love that to be the case but I'm not sure it is.
 

TwoCentPlain

Numbnuts
Messages
15,169
Reaction score
11,084
You are making Demarcus Lawrence & Gregory less valuable. Good thing is Bradlee Anae can play both style & dominate but in 4-3 he can have TJ Watt type of impact.

All this time, I thought you were somehow related to Dak. Turns out you are probably related to Anae. Are Dak and Anae related somehow? Even by a family member marriage?
 

Majic

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,667
Reaction score
1,994
Last year Mike McCarthy was adamant on playing 3-4 knowing he didn’t have the time, coaches & players to do it and still wants to continue go down this road.

Dan Quinn’s success came under 4-3 defense & in Atl SB run it was 4-3 majority of the time.

My question is would you get rid of McCarthy if the defense struggles for the first quarter of the season like last year and promote Kellen Moore as the HC?



Dan Quinn is willing to learn from his mistakes and I think realises multiple looks are on the DEF are what is required with the modern NFL. Mike McCarthy has had success running a 3-4 scheme. Perhaps he is right, perhaps it is the better scheme to run.
 

Typhus

Captain Catfish
Messages
19,818
Reaction score
22,689
Last year Mike McCarthy was adamant on playing 3-4 knowing he didn’t have the time, coaches & players to do it and still wants to continue go down this road.

Dan Quinn’s success came under 4-3 defense & in Atl SB run it was 4-3 majority of the time.

My question is would you get rid of McCarthy if the defense struggles for the first quarter of the season like last year and promote Kellen Moore as the HC?


What would you say is DQs base D?
Just asking for a friend....
 

doomsday9084

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,060
Reaction score
4,056
Random comments:
- Last years' problems with defense had more to do with other issues than alignment. It was a 2 gap scheme that was complicated, implemented with minimal offseason. Guys who were used to simply attacking a gap had to take on a blocker and read all kinds of things to perform the defense correctly and they just didn't have it in them.
- Quinn is not a McCarthy hire. He is a Jones hire. He is going to get a long leash and if it doesn't work, I doubt McCarthy gets blamed.
- Quinn is going to be running the defense he is used to running and its probably closer to Marinelli's defense than what the Cowboys did last year but even then, there are significant differences.
- The Cowboys defense is going to be super young and most of the team's money goes to offense. There is going to be a long leash here.
- As what everyone says, the Cowboys are going to be running a nickel most of the time.
 

CowboyFrog

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,137
Reaction score
10,115
You are making Demarcus Lawrence & Gregory less valuable. Good thing is Bradlee Anae can play both style & dominate but in 4-3 he can have TJ Watt type of impact.


Tank and Gregory will be the most played DL's no matter what D they play, when we are in some form off nickle I can't think of 2 DL that would be on the field more.....I'm hoping we see Tank moved up and down the line in passing situatuions I feel like he would be a monster comming from the middle on a passing down with Parson comming off the egde with Gregory opposite.
 

Dak_Attack_09

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,222
Reaction score
3,603
Tank and Gregory will be the most played DL's no matter what D they play, when we are in some form off nickle I can't think of 2 DL that would be on the field more.....I'm hoping we see Tank moved up and down the line in passing situatuions I feel like he would be a monster comming from the middle on a passing down with Parson comming off the egde with Gregory opposite.

Standing Demarcus & Randy is a waste of snaps, talent, time and so many more issues it causes down the defense. If your just gonna use them as ends in 3-4 then they are being even more wasted as undersized run defenders & block eaters.

Stop with the nonsense and lets just play 4-3 with some wrinkles in blitz & number of DBs.
 

Dak_Attack_09

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,222
Reaction score
3,603
Dan Quinn is willing to learn from his mistakes and I think realises multiple looks are on the DEF are what is required with the modern NFL. Mike McCarthy has had success running a 3-4 scheme. Perhaps he is right, perhaps it is the better scheme to run.

No the multiple look defense is what helped Brady comeback and win the game. 4-3 is what got him a ring.
 

CowboyFrog

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,137
Reaction score
10,115
Standing Demarcus & Randy is a waste of snaps, talent, time and so many more issues it causes down the defense. If your just gonna use them as ends in 3-4 then they are being even more wasted as undersized run defenders & block eaters.

Stop with the nonsense and lets just play 4-3 with some wrinkles in blitz & number of DBs.


I think what everyone is trying to say is the front seven will be in a 4-2 most defensive snaps to allow 5 DB's on the field...your safe mostly the DE's will be rushing the passer
 

Dak_Attack_09

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,222
Reaction score
3,603
I think what everyone is trying to say is the front seven will be in a 4-2 most defensive snaps to allow 5 DB's on the field...your safe mostly the DE's will be rushing the passer

The most effective DL is when there are two DE’s, one 3-tech & one NT in the DL rotation at the same-time in 80% of the snaps.
 

JoeKing

Diehard
Messages
35,574
Reaction score
31,041
Dump question, IMO. They are obviously not going to stick with what's not working. The good thing about having a D that can shift from 3-4 to 4-3 or any variation in between is that you have options.
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
31,563
Reaction score
17,904
Last year Mike McCarthy was adamant on playing 3-4 knowing he didn’t have the time, coaches & players to do it and still wants to continue go down this road.

Dan Quinn’s success came under 4-3 defense & in Atl SB run it was 4-3 majority of the time.

My question is would you get rid of McCarthy if the defense struggles for the first quarter of the season like last year and promote Kellen Moore as the HC?


I think most teams play a hybrid...and we probably will do the same, its a lot about who will be in to rush the passer and the alignment of DL men over the OL....gregory could be in, with his hands down and the other three linemen lined up the same in one play and him standing up in another.....so I doubt if we play a pure 3-4 like the steelers...
 
Top