stiletto
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 13,239
- Reaction score
- 18,028
What do you have against Brad Johnson's doing his job?
So you think Dak wouldn't/couldn't have won the Super Bowl with the 2002 Bucaneers defense? You need to stop smoking scrolls.
What do you have against Brad Johnson's doing his job?
I would hope the 2nd highest paid player would have won that Super Bowl with that defense.So you think Dak wouldn't/couldn't have won the Super Bowl with the 2002 Bucaneers defense? You need to stop smoking scrolls.
I don't think Dak is great, yet.....but I think he has the potential to be. At the end of the day, he's our qb and I'm not gonna crap on him until he deserves it.I have Dak as the 11th best QB right now with all the room in the world to move up.
Do I think he is as good as you think he is? Probably not. I think he is an above average QB, nothing more and nothing less as of right now. That doesn't mean he won't come out and be the best QB in the league next season, but until he does that i'm not going to pretend he's something he's not just cause he has a star on his helmet.
I would hope the 2nd highest paid player would have won that Super Bowl with that defense.
Fair enough.I don't think Dak is great, yet.....but I think he has the potential to be. At the end of the day, he's our qb and I'm not gonna crap on him until he deserves it.
We will never truly know.Dak as a 4th round paid rookie could have won the SB with that Defense....
Almost every season the Cowboys have been a top team going into the season...on paper.
One of these seasons the injury bug is going to get tired of feeding off the Cowboys and decide to fly right over them. In a fair fight, without the devastating injuries, paper equals reality.
I like your question much better. Roy is only good at the straight forward "WHO IS BETTER" stuff that requires no thought to ask.
To answer your question? Dak, easily imo.




We will never truly know.
So you think Dak wouldn't/couldn't have won the Super Bowl with the 2002 Bucaneers defense? You need to stop smoking scrolls.
It's just another Super Bowl winning QB that doesn't have great stats that Roy wants to compare Dak too.
You know his game by now lol

Defense.LOL........right, because my question was too complicated for you?
That "who is better" stuff is just too straight forward.
So if Dak is "easily" better than Brad Johnson, then how did Brad Johnson win a SB?
Your reading comprehension is truly horrendous lolLOL........right, because my question was too complicated for you?
That "who is better" stuff is just too straight forward.
So if Dak is "easily" better than Brad Johnson, then how did Brad Johnson win a SB?
We will never truly know.
Defense.
I think in all fairness, their are quite a few QB led offenses that could win a SB with the 2002 Bucs D.
Your reading comprehension is truly horrendous lol
He never asked who is better like you did, because like I said, you can only ask the most basic of questions.
Got you on the run now.............
So you would rather have Brad than Dak? Whats the matter? Confused?
You really need to work on those reading comprehension skills, Roy.Didnt you just compare Brad to Dak and say Dak is "easily" better?
You are chasing after your own tail now. You were better off acting like a fool and saying Brad was 52 years old.![]()
Brad is 52 years old, Roy. Of course I'd rather have Dak.Got you on the run now.............
So you would rather have Brad than Dak? Whats the matter? Confused?
