Now Panthers are bellyaching about the non turnover

[TheMarathonContinues]

The question said nothing about "all our players".

If you cant follow the rules, then just shut up.

All McCaffery playing does is pushes someone else's production down. He plays and Zylstra, Anderson and Moore's production wouldn't be what it was.

 

[Bob-Lillys-War]

The panthers owner should call it a 'moral victory '

Lets see how that stings the panther fans .

LMAO.

 

[Dre11]

The question said nothing about "all our players".

If you cant follow the rules, then just shut up.

And there's nobody made any rules or asked a question about Mccaffrey

 

[CowboyRoy]

You need to shut up, they have mccaffrey out, so what, we got players out too, all things equal, we bust that a**, don't come with that weak bs a out mcccaffery

I cant help if someone is too dumb to read the question.

 

[CowboyRoy]

All McCaffery playing does is pushes someone else's production down. He plays and Zylstra, Anderson and Moore's production wouldn't be what it was.

Its was a simple question. If you think the Panthers would have done worse with McCaffrey then good for you. I could really care less.

 

[Buzzbait]

Heck, if we hadn't tapped the brakes we would've hung a 40 burger around their neck! LOL

 

[tyke1doe]

I don't make excuses when calls go against us, and I won't accept excuses when they go against our opponents.

 

[Dre11]

I cant help if someone is too dumb to read the question.

Lol...nobody asked you about Mccaffrey nor did you quote anybody ., this thread is about the ref missing a turnover, I can't help a dummy who can't stay on topic

 

[Dre11]

Its was a simple question. If you think the Panthers would have done worse with McCaffrey then good for you. I could really care less.

Wasn't no question...lol

 

[CowboyRoy]

Wasn't no question...lol

wont no question dog!!!

You dig?

 

[Hennessy_King]

Heck, if we hadn't tapped the brakes we would've hung a 40 burger around their neck! LOL

This is exactly right. They were in the game because they were down big and we let up

 

[TwoDeep3]

Dal at the Bucs, there were two mistakes which caused Dal to lose. A penalty wasn't called on a player for the Bucs taking off his helmet and throwing it down on the field. The second was an OPI that wasn't called. The game turned on those mistakes by the ref. Dallas should have won that game.

The fumble was real. It was missed. But that would not have meant the Carolinas would have won.

Dallas would still have beaten the Panthers because there was a half left and the Dallas D was beating down Darnold.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Its was a simple question. If you think the Panthers would have done worse with McCaffrey then good for you. I could really care less.

Not worse. Just would've done the same. He doesn't play defense and stop the dominance of the 3rd quarter.

 

[CowboyRoy]

Not worse. Just would've done the same. He doesn't play defense and stop the dominance of the 3rd quarter.

We can speculate. I happen to think he makse them better. Much better. Regardless I think the Cowboys win. Just Dak has to throw for 300 yards instead of 200.

 

[Verdict]

I am a little bit surprised that we seem to have gotten a couple of big calls go our way. On the other hand the loss of the 2 point conversion was a huge reversal. Although I think a reversal was probably the right call, I don’t think the video evidence was there to overturn it. That was a bit of a makeup call. So the Panthers don’t have a lot of room to complain.

Panthers blocked in the back a LOT today that weren’t called. I think that the calls that went in our favor regarding Shultz (two fumbles) were the right calls. So we really didn’t get any breaks on those two calls.

 

[nathanlt]

it shoulve been a turnover

thats just the truth.....

but lets flip this thing because if it was Dallas the media wouldve said we missed two touchdown passes which Darnold did and their defense didnt show up which it didnt and you cant leave the game in the refs hands

soooo it is what it is

I assume one of Schultz's fumbles... I only saw the highlight replays, but it seemed inconclusive to overturn a fumble. I'll look again, though.

Having reviewed it again, the forward progress idea is unrelated to the fumble, so that is admittedly weird. Schultz's back hit the ground before the ball came out, so he was down, plain and simple. No conclusive proof that the ball was moving before he was slammed into the turf... no angle that I've seen shows that.

Last update: So many Cowboy fans are saying that it was a fumble... maybe there's some angle that I haven't seen. The ground caused it, as best I can tell. (I didn't see the game live, so...)

 

[RonnieT24]

Yeah I don't want to hear anything about that injury crap because we've had injuries all year and it hasn't been a excuse

Unless McCafferey was going to step in at DT or ILB I don't think he was going to be much help to them in this game. They didn't lose because of their running backs.. They lost because their d-line got handled .. to say nothing of their secondary.

 

[DasTex]

I thought their defense was the 85 bears.

 

[lqmac1]

If that is what they are saying then they are truly delusional.

I said it before the game, I lived in Charlotte and they are a delusional fanbase. I guarantee you they think that turnover cost them the game and they will not acknowledge the fact that they had the lead at half regardless of it.

They’ll also claim that they figured out our defense in the fourth quarter rather than the obvious which is us letting off the gas.

Whatever though, it’s their L not ours.

 

[BAT]