anyone catch that?
I didn't hear that. Did he say that explicitly, or are referring the conversation between Buck and Aikman about this being the first team since Aikman left that looks this good? I'm a huge Romo fan -- the early years Dak had nearly identical QBR numbers but if you looked at the breakdown Dak was a lesser passer but made up for it by his plays with his legs. Dak has advanced as a passer since then. The 'new' throwing motion two years really raised his game to a new level as a passer.
At baseline Dak is a lower risk / lower reward QB than Romo. I would argue that Romo is the more creative of the two, and I would also add that Romo had to overcome Garrett's offense. Romo made a lot of guys rich, so I'd like to see a WR leave here for a big contract only to drop out of the league without Dak. Dak has had a lot of turnovers (fumbles) this year, which is uncharacteristic but needs to go away. A lot of talent on this team as well.
Having said all that, I think the case can be made he is better than Romo though I'd like to see what Romo would do with this team.