Dak Prescott Calls out ‘Bandwagon’ Cowboys Fans

SteveTheCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
18,862
Reaction score
13,367
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I don't give a freak what you asked, I answered it how I wanted , again I've yet to see anyone explain how he disrespected the fans, that was the original question I asked before you chimed in, what make you think your question is any more important. You have yet to give an explanation, yet you want to ask a question. Gtfoh
I did give an explanation. You not liking it doesn't change the facts.
You are to Gung ho to fight...to understand language and conversations are about definitions. A 6 game win streak does not create band wagon fans. A super bowl does.
Dak doesn't have band wagon fans. He's got typical fickle Cowboys fans.

It's a dumb comment because of that....and...he should be concentrating on winning the next game rather than chewing out fans.
 

SteveTheCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
18,862
Reaction score
13,367
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I don't give a freak what you asked, I answered it how I wanted , again I've yet to see anyone explain how he disrespected the fans, that was the original question I asked before you chimed in, what make you think your question is any more important. You have yet to give an explanation, yet you want to ask a question. Gtfoh
Why are you so angry?
 

OmerV

Well-Known Member
Messages
25,927
Reaction score
22,450
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Okay.

That doesn't make you right. You've watched a lot of Cowboys football in your life. You should be ashamed with this organization and how far its fallen. Cowboys fans used to expect winning, now they're satisfied with pretty stats.

Why should anyone be ashamed of the Cowboys - of things the Cowboys did or didn't doof do that they had nothing to do with? Disappointed the Cowboys haven't done better over the years? Of course. But ashamed? I guess you feel adding a dramatic flair somehow makes your point?

As for being satisfied with petty stats, that's a nonsensical argument, and simply not true. The stats aren't discussed to show we are happy with that and don't care about winning, they are used as points of evaluation to help determine what is working and what isn't. You don't just blame everyone when the team doesn't win. You can't just cut everyone and start over. So you have to look at things and make determinations, and stats are part of that.
 
Last edited:

MountaineerCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,786
Reaction score
63,588
Where did he say Dak should get the same kind of treatment as Brady?

What you were busted for was saying Brady didn't have the kind of weapons the Cowboys have, and then trying to cover it up by stupidly suggestion you only meant that the players on the two teams were different people - as if we needed to be told Cooper, Lamb, Gallup and Schultz don't play for the Bucs.

Nobody said Dak was as good a QB as Brady, they just said that having good weapons (like Brady and Dak), doesn't mean the QB isn't playing at a high level.
I stopped responding to you because your argument was stupid yesterday and it's still stupid today.

That's why I'm not getting into again.

So, to answer you question this time, the poster stated:
"Here's a fun fact: Prescott has been taking heavy fire for his team being 1-2 the last 3 games. You know who else is 1-2?
Brady."


The poster clearly is insinuating that Dak should be treated the same as Brady because they've both been slumping. You don't want to see these things because you also believe this junk. You have crowed Dak, so you agree with nonsense like that, so I have nothing for you.
 

Dre11

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,686
Reaction score
11,450
I did give an explanation. You not liking it doesn't change the facts.
You are to Gung ho to fight...to understand language and conversations are about definitions. A 6 game win streak does not create band wagon fans. A super bowl does.
Dak doesn't have band wagon fans. He's got typical fickle Cowboys fans.

It's a dumb comment because of that....and...he should be concentrating on winning the next game rather than chewing out fans.

You didn't, and I answered the question as well, this team will always have a a bandwagon as I said earlier based on its popularity and past succes, I'll use your words, just because you don't like doesn't mean it isn't true.
 

OmerV

Well-Known Member
Messages
25,927
Reaction score
22,450
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I stopped responding to you because your argument was stupid yesterday and it's still stupid today.

That's why I'm not getting into again.

So, to answer you question this time, the poster stated:
"Here's a fun fact: Prescott has been taking heavy fire for his team being 1-2 the last 3 games. You know who else is 1-2?
Brady."


The poster clearly is insinuating that Dak should be treated the same as Brady because they've both been slumping. You don't want to see these things because you also believe this junk. You have crowed Dak, so you agree with nonsense like that, so I have nothing for you.
That's it, when your words are used against you just call people stupid. Feel free to stick out your tongue and take your ball and go home too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: G2

CowboyFrog

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,137
Reaction score
10,115
Because I fail to see why that matters?

I don't have an answer for why. If you're proud of having a top offense then good for you. I remember Dak saying before the season his goal was to have the #1 offense in the NFL. Good for him.

Brady's goal is number 8 while Dak's goal is the #1 offense. That's what really matters. That's what separates the winners from the losers.


Lol sure man, again you can make up what ever you want but what you cant do is tell me what more he needs to be doing "with all this Talent" you keep trying to slight him with. If in your head you think thats what it is then that doesnt suprise me...Again he threw us back into a game that the defense gave up 500 yards 100+ penalty yards and 33 points, missing WR1 and WR2, pretty silly trying to make that some horrible use of talent for the QB...lol
 

bsbellomy

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,367
Reaction score
3,145
When Aikman was asked if Dallas was a good sports town, he replied "Dallas is a good winner's town". Truer words never spoken.

When the Stars moved to Dallas and won the trophy, people had flocked to the games that didn't know squat about hockey. The players complained that too many were on their cellphones or just visiting instead of watching the game.

If someone's team has to win, has to reward them for being a fan, I do not consider them a fan.

In other words it hasn't been a good town for Cowboys fans for 25 years.
 

CowboyFrog

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,137
Reaction score
10,115
I stopped responding to you because your argument was stupid yesterday and it's still stupid today.

That's why I'm not getting into again.

So, to answer you question this time, the poster stated:
"Here's a fun fact: Prescott has been taking heavy fire for his team being 1-2 the last 3 games. You know who else is 1-2?
Brady."


The poster clearly is insinuating that Dak should be treated the same as Brady because they've both been slumping. You don't want to see these things because you also believe this junk. You have crowed Dak, so you agree with nonsense like that, so I have nothing for you.


what does "treated the same" mean to you? Dude I dont care what happened before this current season...News flash genius before any of the current SB winning QB's won a trophy they had not won a trophy..WTH "Should be treated the same" a loss is a loss dont care about what happend the seasons before the loss.
 

OmerV

Well-Known Member
Messages
25,927
Reaction score
22,450
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Even Dak doesn't get it.
Did you read his words? The headline is misleading. He didn't call out fans - no animosity was expressed, or even disappointment or blame - he merely indicated fan interest can be dependent on how the team is playing. Seems to me he got that pretty right.
 

MountaineerCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,786
Reaction score
63,588
Lol sure man, again you can make up what ever you want but what you cant do is tell me what more he needs to be doing "with all this Talent" you keep trying to slight him with. If in your head you think thats what it is then that doesnt suprise me...Again he threw us back into a game that the defense gave up 500 yards 100+ penalty yards and 33 points, missing WR1 and WR2, pretty silly trying to make that some horrible use of talent for the QB...lol
Derek Carrs defense gave up 33 points. The Raiders had 14 penalties for 100+ yards.

Dak had his chance in OT to lead us down the field and choked. Carr got his chance and they won the game.

That was the difference. I don't like it and you don't like it, but us not liking it doesn't chance a single thing.
 

MountaineerCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,786
Reaction score
63,588
what does "treated the same" mean to you? Dude I dont care what happened before this current season...News flash genius before any of the current SB winning QB's won a trophy they had not won a trophy..WTH "Should be treated the same" a loss is a loss dont care about what happend the seasons before the loss.
I mean, of course you're going to say "I don't care what happened before this current season" and "what happened the seasons before the loss don't matter" when you believe that Tom Brady and Dak should be teared the same when their teams are slumping a little. You say that because Dak has done NOTHING in the past that matters. So you want to just throw everything they've accomplished out because YOU KNOW that the reason Brady is treated differently than Dak has to do with all he's accomplished compared to the nothing Dak has accomplished. You're just too much of a homer to bring yourself to say it.
 

Rayman70

Well-Known Member
Messages
33,551
Reaction score
32,124
Dak missed the memo that reads WINNING MATTERS . Fans being fanatics, like 2 back a winner. Lately we stink. I been a fan since 1973 and back this team. But many are just tired of the talk with little results. Its been 25 years Dak.Can u blame the fans for that? Excuse our skepticism.
 
Top