well, there is eye test with a biased glass (both Dak fans and Dak haters)....there is absolutely no denying that....both pick and choose certain stats,games, etc and different things to measure with their bias.... and there are actually a few dak detractors that say, I don't need anything, my eye test will tell me and then they fail in the most basic football concepts...go figure
then there is PFF, that at least tries to set some standards for its staff to accumulate some data. no one ever claimed PFF to be gold standard, but at least it tries to apply same standard to all NFL teams without bias. where it lacks is that sometimes they have to guess on a play to grade a player, without fully understanding responsibility, play design or intent of the coordinator in calling a specific play or formation. that's why I clearly mentioned you take PFF with a grain of salt.
and I don't eye test mock anyone...it seems you got very offended when I asked about the source, given the poster mentioned that bad throws were in 25-30% range and I questioned how did he come up with that and the source. legitimate question...if I said it was 1-2%, I would expect you to ask the same question. what's your source, how did you come up with that figure and who the heck are you....
and if I was in charge, I would do film study and ask my staff to put certain stats together for me....
so is that your round about way of saying, your eye test is more accurate than anybody else?
