Why Trevon Diggs' PFF Grade Doesn't Reflect His Interception Total

JBS said:
It’s not about not liking your opinions. That’s a false statement. Your opinion on Diggs is wrong. So yes, that would make you not very intelligent. Correct.
Click to expand...
Look at your post to like ratio and look at mine.

Who has the bad opinions?
 
JBS said:
Correct. It almost never happens. There was a 2-3 game stretch where he was bad. He’s been excellent every other game. OP is clueless. He doesn’t know what he’s watching.
Click to expand...

When we suck it’s usually because we get behind and throw a lot. Inept offense in games until the very end.
 
MountaineerCowboy said:
All 3 of the posters mad about this article and taking it out on me have way more posts than likes. I'm not surprised.

You guys never post quality content. Ya'll just come here to act like you know more than anyone else and never really even talk about the game or players. Ya'll just come here to fuss, argue, whine, and insult.
Click to expand...
Nope that would be you
 
CT Dal Fan said:
PFF is not the only tool to use when looking at a player's performance. It is just one tool of many. If you take away a few big pass plays Diggs gave up this year I would imagine his PFF grade would be much higher.

There is no way to justify giving Diggs a low grade, I don't care how many yards he's allowed. Taking the ball away, denying an opponent a chance to score while giving your own offense a bonus possession, is the most important thing a defensive player can do.

To that end, Diggs is having a historically great season.
Click to expand...

If Diggs played for the Bucs, Packers or Chiefs, I wonder if there would be so much determination amongst PFF and some NFL fans to downplay his INTs. Or would the focus be mostly on how awesome Diggs is for giving Brady, Rodgers and Mahomes an 11 extra possessions in a single season and would the hot takes be how dangerous the Bucs, Packers, and Chiefs can be in the playoffs, due to a DB like Diggs being able to give the ball back to Brady, Rodgers and Mahomes.

Because the Cowboys have converted many of Diggs INTs into points. And Diggs has returned a couple for pick sixes.
 
JBS said:
you think because the bozos around here like your opinion that that means you know football? Hahahahaahah

you really have no idea what you are talking about then
Click to expand...
Work on that ratio and maybe people will take you more seriously.

You've been on this site since 2004 and I've been on here less than a year and I already have more likes than you.

Nobody likes someone that thinks they know it all. Your ratio is proof.
 
Romo_To_Dez said:
If Diggs played for the Bucs, Packers or Chiefs, I wonder if there would be so much determination amongst PFF and some NFL fans to downplay his INTs. Or would the focus be mostly on how awesome Diggs is for giving Brady, Rodgers and Mahomes an 11 extra possessions in a single season and would the hot takes be how dangerous the Bucs, Packers, and Chiefs can be in the playoffs, due to a DB like Diggs being able to give the ball back to Brady, Rodgers and Mahomes.

Because the Cowboys have converted many of Diggs INTs into points. And Diggs has returned a couple for pick sixes.
Click to expand...
Some of ya'll want the Cowboys to be victims so bad lol
 
MountaineerCowboy said:
Work on that ratio and maybe people will take you more seriously.

You've been on this site since 2004 and I've been on here less than a year and I already have more likes than you.

Nobody likes someone that thinks they know it all. Your ratio is proof.
Click to expand...

That’s correct. Most people don’t like when somebody is smarter than them. You also have that same problem. Glad we are on the same page
 
MountaineerCowboy said:
Some of ya'll want the Cowboys to be victims so bad lol
Click to expand...

This isn't an answer to my post. Would there be so many trying to downplay Diggs INTs and trying to call them "meaningless." If he played on the teams that I mentioned and he was giving the ball back to the QBs I mentioned. Or would the takes mostly be on how dangerous the Bucs, Packers and Chiefs are because they have a defensive player that can create turnovers?
 
MountaineerCowboy said:
Work on that ratio and maybe people will take you more seriously.

You've been on this site since 2004 and I've been on here less than a year and I already have more likes than you.

Nobody likes someone that thinks they know it all. Your ratio is proof.
Click to expand...

you been here less than a year and you have over 9k posts. Lololol. Not something you should be proud of. Evaluate things.
 
MountaineerCowboy said:
Work on that ratio and maybe people will take you more seriously.

You've been on this site since 2004 and I've been on here less than a year and I already have more likes than you.

Nobody likes someone that thinks they know it all. Your ratio is proof.
Click to expand...
I gave you a like and took it back and it was kinda fun may do it again
 
Romo_To_Dez said:
This isn't an answer to my post. Would there be so many trying to downplay Diggs INTs and trying to call them "meaningless." If he played on the teams that I mentioned and he was giving the ball back to the QBs I mentioned. Or would the takes mostly be on how dangerous the Bucs, Packers and Chiefs are because they have a defensive player that can create turnovers?
Click to expand...
I don't believe Diggs INTs are "meaningless".

I believe people think the Cowboys defense is dangerous and Diggs is a part of that.

Also, I believe PFF would grade Diggs the same no matter what team he is on.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Staff online

Members online

... and 69 more.
Total: 889 (members: 169, guests: 720)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
465,576
Messages
13,883,748
Members
23,791
Latest member
mashburn
Back
Top