willia451
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,283
- Reaction score
- 3,525
The Lions are a trash franchise.
Well...............after the last 26 years..............
The Lions are a trash franchise.
*After bouncing the ball off the chest of the defender on "game winning drive"Youre better than this
Goff beat the bad QB we have here and the only reason they defeated the Saints was due to a horrific non-call in the Championship game. They scored only 3 points in the Super Bowl.
Meanwhile, Stafford beat Kyler Murray, outplayed Tom Brady on his field, and beat the team* Dak couldnt.
So yea, try again
It doesn't matter. In 2012, Flacco was in his 4th year as an NFL player since he was drafted in 2008, yet he led the Ravens to a SB victory and was named SB MVP.Yeah, but you're going back a decade to make a point. Flacco 2012 was prime Flacco. Since that super bowl he was pretty hot and cold then eventually became a game manager and now a backup. Brady, Rogers, etc have changed the narrative a bit, but you can count on every QB to play at a high level into their mid 30s. Lamar hasnt done much since taking over, but that last year of Flacco its clear Jackson was a bit of a shot in the arm to that team.
Absolutely agree it’s a team but I bet our chances are better with Rodgers or Mahommes though.
With the way you are phrasing the question yes I agree with you. Comparing Flaccos year 4 with Jacksons year 4 I think is missing the point of the poster though. I think it has much less to do with comparing year 4 of Flacco to year 4 of Jackson and much more to do with that same time period when they made the switch.It doesn't matter. In 2012, Flacco was in his 4th year as an NFL player since he was drafted in 2008. Lamar was drafted in 2018. This was his 4th season, yet he has not been able to lead his talented team to a Super Bowl. The comparison is actually fair and legit.
Understood. Not fair because of age differences, but I see what you mean.With the way you are phrasing the question yes I agree with you. Comparing Flaccos year 4 with Jacksons year 4 I think is missing the point of the poster though. I think it has much less to do with comparing year 4 of Flacco to year 4 of Jackson and much more to do with that same time period when they made the switch.
Dak has enough talent around him to go deep in the playoffs....unfortunately, he can't hit the broad side of a barn. And for the 10,000th time....you cannot learn to be accurate....so PLEASE....quit praying and waiting for it suddenly to happen.
Dak has enough talent around him to go deep in the playoffs....unfortunately, he can't hit the broad side of a barn. And for the 10,000th time....you cannot learn to be accurate....so PLEASE....quit praying and waiting for it suddenly to happen.
I have argued for years on this forum and elsewhere that football is the ultimate team game.
Time and Time again, "internet experts" keep telling me "it's the QB... it's the QB"
Can you "eXpErTs" explain to me how this can be true when the exact same QB in Matt Stafford that "couldn't win a playoff game" is now in the Super Bowl? Could it be that his TEAM is in the Super Bowl and he didn't have that level of TEAM when in Detroit?
How are Aaron Rodgers and Patrick Mahomes sitting at home? Could it be that their TEAMS didn't play well enough to win?
Dak is more than capable of going to and winning the super bowl. But HE and the TEAM have to put it all together.
All I know is Dak sucks
Do not be surprised if one of his critics changes that to "Dak kicks rocks."Dak rocks
Any given SundayQUICK...
who here can explain why the greatest qb's in the league (Mahomes, Rodgers, Allen, Herbert etc) are all sitting home with Dak this week?
These RIDICULOUS brainless arguments about other teams' progression in the playoffs are just exhausting.
And a short deal so he can re-up soon and limit the Cowboys restructure options. That decision may bite him if he cant perform the next couple years.The problem is Dak being unrealistic about his talent he was never one of the elite so thinking he deserves their $$$$ was just wrong and bugs all of us. Look at what the elite big $$$$ have done, now look at what Dak hasn't done. All of that is wrong and we all know it. This....that was the going rate and....is BS, the guy isn't worth no 40 mill get real.
Showing us he couldn't care less about our situation just pay him sucks. The guy makes all that endorsement $$$$ and he needs 40 mill......come on get real.
That is my problem with Dak, that and he isn't that good at all, so he needs to take.....not all that good at all $$$$$.
Hard to deal w/ it when he fails over and over.The Dak argument/debate is getting old. I've moved on to the draft. DAK is our QB for the forseeable furture and we should just deal with it and move on.