Stash
Staff member
- Messages
- 78,400
- Reaction score
- 102,357
Yes I would.
Not me. Gregory has never come close to earning what he will cost. Even between multiple suspensions.
Yes I would.
Was it really tho? By next off-season $20 mil won’t be a top 10 paid WR either
Not me. Gregory has never come close to earning what he will cost. Even between multiple suspensions.
Id consider resigning Armstrong instead of Gregory. We only gave up 20 points once in the 6 games he started. He had a sack every 100 snaps, which is par for a starting DE. Armstrong will come in less than 8 figures per year. Im guessing probably a short term (2 years) deal for 8 per. Gives him some security and a chance to cash in soonNot me. Gregory has never come close to earning what he will cost. Even between multiple suspensions.
I think they would of gotten value if they traded him last season, but now teams know they need the cap money and would rather sign him to a cheaper deal. Browns were the only ones willing to take on that original, market level contract. Question is, I know they are going to draft a WR somewhere within the top 3 rds, do they sign a fa starter?
A receiver taken in the draft lessens his leverage, as does his health issue.This team is awful at negotiating. Now we just gave Gallup a ton of leverage because he knows we have to pay him now.
Career isn't last year.
And next off-season is next off-season.
He’s 27. Taking the 1 outlier season doesn’t make sense. Especially when his targets drastically declined due to no fault of his own
He had a 90 catch season playing mostly with back ups in 2020 too. If Dak was healthy he would have hit triple digits. Amari has been pretty consistently good for 70-80 catches 1000 to 1100 yards for his career. Even in a somewhat down year, his numbers were that far off considering he played 15 games
I think it was a pure cost cutting measure. They wanted to get rid of a chunk of cap. It was probably him or Lawrence and they picked Lawrence.
......coming off an ACL......let that sink in. And Noah Brown waiting in the wings.I cannot believe we are going to give a guy coming off an ACL 10 mill a year. Ridiculous.
He’s 27. Taking the 1 outlier season doesn’t make sense. Especially when his targets drastically declined due to no fault of his own
Yes I would.
Id consider resigning Armstrong instead of Gregory. We only gave up 20 points once in the 6 games he started. He had a sack every 100 snaps, which is par for a starting DE. Armstrong will come in less than 8 figures per year. Im guessing probably a short term (2 years) deal for 8 per. Gives him some security and a chance to cash in soon
Ummmmm, ever heard of the Indianapolis Colts who did worse after only 1 year?Only in Dallas would they trade a #1 pick for a guy they would overpay and be happy to trade him for a bag of beans to save the cap hit!
no we are not first off
We save 16mil against the cap..umm yes better than nothing..i always thought the narrative is the FO takes too long holds on too long before letting and player go..they are getting ahead of his contract that helps cap room. he maybe a very solid 1 but hes not elite nor been great of late had little drive and passion to be any more then hes always been and now going top his 3rd team. Lamb and Gallup along with whatever else they come up with add Schultz is back will be fine..im more concerned about reestablish the OL and run game it will actually make the pass game better ..less options imo is better we can key one player per game and try and scheme him vs just saying oh well we have an embarrassment of riches at WR and still one and done in the payoffs. Far too many options like too large a menu that take forever choosing what top order, easier to target and scheme players , i mean its not leaving us without starers like in 18..lamb a first round pick and Gallups better then he was 3 years age. We wil eb fine stop whining and overreacting,. AC has not been special and not helped us get over the hump..
... accept change its part of life and part of sports.