Captain-Crash
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 21,542
- Reaction score
- 33,800
nicesophistry
nicesophistry
So Aaron Rodgers lost to the same 49ers team that Dak lost too....so help me here using your logic Rodgers was the reason they couldn't beat the 49ers and Jimmy G is better than him because he beat him? Am I following you correctly?
Would you take Jimmy G over A Rod?Yeah Aaron choked big time in that game. He definitely played like an equivalent/inferior QB that weekend. Their roster is built around him carrying them to an extent. 10 points in a divisional round home game as the number 1 seed is not an acceptable outcome in that game.
If Aaron and Dak can’t be the difference makers in playoff games like that, what is the benefit of paying them 20-25% of the salary cap? Their pay is enormous because when things are close, they are the xfactor.
But Aaron has been only making his money in the regular season the last few years. That post-2010 stigma will follow him until he’s able to overcome whatever this block is he has. It’s not even losing close shootouts; 10 total points….
Would you take Jimmy G over A Rod?
Hmm…so you’re taking Jimmy G over Herbert or Watson?No, because A-rod has proven to have done it before. He has precedence and reputation. 5 championship games, a super bowl ring. As Jimmy did too, this wasn’t his first rodeo. 4 playoff wins in the last 3 years. Joe Burrow is a great example of this. Before this year we had no expectations of him. But now, each playoff run, each season will be viewed within the lens that the man has 3 playoff wins already, and returning to the AFCCG would be old hat.
Does Dak have a backing list of credentials as well, or was what happened against SF just about on par with his postseason success this far? Was what he did against SF really surprising? 7 points through 3 quarters, then a bulk of passing yards toward the end of the fourth while he was down by multiple scores so the ending stats are a bit more favorable… just enough not to appear to be the main reason they lose. We’ve heard this story before.
Hmm…so you’re taking Jimmy G over Herbert or Watson?
And Jimmy G over Russell Wilson?Watson right now yeah. I’ll go for Herbert for the potential
And Jimmy G over Russell Wilson?
Sigh.... disappointing thread. A few more sighs...Who would you rather have? It is a flat out no brainer for me...it's Jimmy G. For the life of me, I cannot understand why SF is in such a hurry to replace him. SF was one Eli Manning pop fly type throw and catch by KC in the Super Bowl from winning one himself....until that happened, they were toast. Is Jimmy G great? No. But he has more tools than Dak, who will NEVER sniff a Super Bowl. Does Dak have a no trade clause? If not, let's get something going....we are wasting our time by doing nothing.
Some of the fanbase has been compromised by Eagirls fans.Bruh Man this is all I'm saying. The Dak Haters are trying to say it's anything but blind hatred. Saying sh... like it's garbage time stats or some other hate filled mantra
trying to piss on my head and tell me its raining
Jimmy G has never attempted more than 476 passes in a season. Dak has pushed 600 passing attempts twice in his career because the Cowboys depend on him to win games. Jimmy G would have double the fumbles and INTs if he had to throw as much as Dak. Dak has had games with over 60 passing attempts. With the loss of two or top four receivers and the holes we have on the OL and not being supported by a great defense Jimmy G would have no chance with this team. Not wasting anymore time with this.
Who would you rather have? It is a flat out no brainer for me...it's Jimmy G. For the life of me, I cannot understand why SF is in such a hurry to replace him. SF was one Eli Manning pop fly type throw and catch by KC in the Super Bowl from winning one himself....until that happened, they were toast. Is Jimmy G great? No. But he has more tools than Dak, who will NEVER sniff a Super Bowl. Does Dak have a no trade clause? If not, let's get something going....we are wasting our time by doing nothing.