Twitter: Clarence Hill: Anthony Barr is an option for the Cowboys per source

fivetwos

fivetwos

Well-Known Member
Messages
19,174
Reaction score
26,029
Another guy for Sam Williams to have to climb past?

Progress stopper.

Better shot at Williams being something special vs Barr being the answer to our problems.
 
Typhus

Typhus

Captain Catfish
Messages
19,708
Reaction score
22,614
Hawkeye0202 said:
No surprise but what's the "right" price.

Click to expand...

Would be good for depth, just a quick look at the LB depth and we should be easily entertaining all candidates.
We can redshirt Clark, so anyone sold on Gifford maintaining the roster spot?
 
Bullflop

Bullflop

Cowboys Diehard
Messages
24,579
Reaction score
29,933
Stephen might be interested in Barr but being "interested' isn't what makes a signing happen. ;)

Unfortunately, Stephen is seldom inclined to allow his interest to interfere with his miserly habits.

Don't get me wrong, I'd actually enjoy seeing someone of his ilk sign with this team but I doubt it.
 
rags747

rags747

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,585
Reaction score
8,093
Rather start a rookie, Barr is 34 maybe?! Give me youth and craziness as far as I’m concerned.
 
_sturt_

_sturt_

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,833
Reaction score
3,760
1. "Progress stopper" I suppose makes some sense in theory, but a serious candidate for a job goes out and wins the job no matter who's in front of him. Progress is earned. And if the so-called progress-stopper is well paid, in the NFL, there's even the opportunity to cut that guy and escape some part of the salary... vis-a-vis, that much more incentive to let progress occur.

2. Would love to get Barr, but there are higher priorities, imo... safety net O-lineman (I don't trust 21 year-olds unless they come into the league with Tyron's scouting report) and temporary starter at WR (James Washington doesn't come to Dallas with starter-quality stats, but worse, he comes to Dallas in statistical freefall... we're not okay there, at least until Gallup returns.).
 
speedkilz88

speedkilz88

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,038
Reaction score
21,903
_sturt_ said:
1. "Progress stopper" I suppose makes some sense in theory, but a serious candidate for a job goes out and wins the job no matter who's in front of him. Progress is earned. And if the so-called progress-stopper is well paid, in the NFL, there's even the opportunity to cut that guy and escape some part of the salary... vis-a-vis, that much more incentive to let progress occur.

2. Would love to get Barr, but there are higher priorities, imo... safety net O-lineman (I don't trust 21 year-olds unless they come into the league with Tyron's scouting report) and temporary starter at WR (James Washington doesn't come to Dallas with starter-quality stats, but worse, he comes to Dallas in statistical freefall... we're not okay there, at least until Gallup returns.).
Click to expand...
If a vet is on the roster for game 1 then he can ask for his whole years salary if cut during the season. (they can do this once I believe)
 
Flamma

Flamma

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,001
Reaction score
18,801
rambo2 said:
They would get LVE and Barr for a lot less than what Wagner got.
Click to expand...

What's a lot less? Over the next 3 years Wagner gets 26.5M. With a 2 million dead cap if they release him afterwards. That's just under 9M per.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top