Mad Dog - "You can't tell me he (Prescott) is a Top 10 QB". Booger McFarland disagrees

[Diehardblues]

There's a lot of Cowboys fans who think what you're doing here is comical. I think you've failed on your premise- namely that these guys are trolls from other teams. It's just an ad hominem you're hoping will take or an attempt at getting under their skin.

The irony is you're not really exposing anything. The people who don't like these, "trolls," already aren't talking to them.

I appreciate your comments .

 

[phildadon86]

No wonder you're such a big Dak fan. Birds of a feather and whatnot.
Excuses excuses excuses.

Lol oh wow. Now you’re pretending to know me personally. Amazing.

 

[Vtwin]

I have no issue if they are an opposing fan . But if they are then they shouldn’t pose as a Cowboy fan.

There may be some Cowboy fans who want to discuss Dak with rival fans posing as Cowboy fans .

I honestly think you're seeing ghosts. I also honestly think there should be some burden of proof placed on you, as the accuser.

I also honestly think that you care about this stuff far more than most everyone else and that you should refrain from speaking for anyone, but yourself.

I furthermore honestly think that you're not being honest with yourself.

Honestly.

 

[Vtwin]

Lol oh wow. Now you’re pretending to know me personally. Amazing.

Says the guy who regularly ascribes the emotion of hate to others.

I just respond to what you put out. Are you saying you're not genuine in your posting?

 

[Oz-of-Cowboy-Country]

Ok cool, Dak is a top 10 QB, many said the same about Romo. So that means Dallas has had back to back top 10 QB's and where has it gotten us as a team?....exactly.....no where....
When this organization starts to win playoff games and makes serious championship runs as a team then maybe we can discuss the individual accomplishments, until then it's nothing more then homerism at its finest.

What's the definition of homerism?

 

[Diehardblues]

I honestly think your seeing ghosts. I also honestly think there should be some burden of proof placed on you, as the accuser.

I also honestly think that you care about this stuff far more than most everyone else and that you should refrain from speaking for anyone, but yourself.

I furthermore honestly think that you're not being honest with yourself.

Honestly.

I guess you missed much of the earlier back and forth . First of all the accused inadvertently admitted to being a troll in another thread .

And then when I questioned about profile they blocked it as if to hide something. It seemed very suspicious . I provided ample opportunity to explain . But instead continued to deflect the question furthering more suspicion.

I’ve made my point. It doesn’t have to be decidedly determined at this time . We shall see how it develops. Thanks

Have a nice 4th everyone !

 

[88sAndHeartbreak]

All I said was... you're wrong.

 

[phildadon86]

Says the guy who regularly ascribes the emotion of hate to others.

I just respond to what you put out. Are you saying you're not genuine in your posting?

I don’t act hateful to anyone. I don’t even know what you’re talking about. I criticize players on this team when it’s warranted. When it’s not. I don’t. Simple as

 

[Captain-Crash]

Homerism
Being blindly devoted to your favorite sports team whether they are good or not.
Saying clearly untrue things about your favorite team (i.e. Jamarcus Russell was the best QB ever)

 

[CT Dal Fan]

Haven't stopped in here in a couple of weeks.

Glad to see nothing has changed. Or am I???

 

[Vtwin]

I don’t act hateful to anyone. I don’t even know what you’re talking about. I criticize players on this team when it’s warranted. When it’s not. I don’t. Simple as

Clearly you don't know what I'm talking about.

When did I say you act hateful towards anyone?

 

[88sAndHeartbreak]

Homerism
Being blindly devoted to your favorite sports team whether they are good or not.
Saying clearly untrue things about your favorite team (i.e. Jamarcus Russell was the best QB ever)

What's it called when people hold on to an opinion even after being proven wrong? i.e. Dak is inaccurate, Dak doesnt beat winning teams, Dak doesn't throw down field.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Homerism
Being blindly devoted to your favorite sports team whether they are good or not.
Saying clearly untrue things about your favorite team (i.e. Jamarcus Russell was the best QB ever)

Comparing Jamarcus Russell to Dak.......ehhhh....not the best.

 

[plasticman]

That Green Bay loss was not on Dak. At all.

There isn't anything he could have done to build enough of a lead that Rodger's incredible pass wouldn't have mattered?

Games have 60 minutes of time in which a team can produce a positive outcome, not 35 seconds. Yes, Dak brought the team back from an 18 point deficit but are you saying he had nothing to do with the 18 point deficit in the first place?

It kills me to look at it that way because I really like Dak. However, I'm trying to be fair. Where is his signature game, the one that shows us Dak and the Cowboys are destined for a championship or more? Remember, this was Romo's greatest criticism, productive everywhere but when you need it the most.

Back to the Green Bay game...

13 points after three quarters? 1st and 10 on the Packers 15 with a minute to go in the 2nd half and they can't get an inch? 2nd and 1 on the Packers 19 midway through the 3rd quarter and Dak throws a terrible INT?

You can't just look at a single play at the end of a game and say that is why they lost. Part of the reason they lost was because they put themselves in a position during the game where it was possible for a single play to beat them and Dak was part of it.

I fully expect Dak to show us this season that he deserves to be considered elite. I believe he has it in him, he just hasn't done it yet.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

What's it called when people hold on to an opinion even after being proven wrong? i.e. Dak is inaccurate, Dak doesnt beat winning teams, Dak doesn't throw down field.

The Dak hate brigade is just silly at this point. That's one thing I'll say man I wish we could have a honest discussion about Dak on this site. But instead, it has to be over the top every time with outdated criticisms of him.

 

[Captain-Crash]

Comparing Jamarcus Russell to Dak.......ehhhh....not the best.

come on you can do better. the guy above asked what homerism was.
no where did I say dak anything?

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

There isn't anything he could have done to build enough of a lead that Rodger's incredible pass wouldn't have mattered?

Games have 60 minutes of time in which a team can produce a positive outcome, not 35 seconds. Yes, Dak brought the team back from an 18 point deficit but are you saying he had nothing to do with the 18 point deficit in the first place?

It kills me to look at it that way because I really like Dak. However, I'm trying to be fair. Where is his signature game, the one that shows us Dak and the Cowboys are destined for a championship or more? Remember, this was Romo's greatest criticism, productive everywhere but when you need it the most.

Back to the Green Bay game...

13 points after three quarters? 1st and 10 on the Packers 15 with a minute to go in the 2nd half and they can't get an inch? 2nd and 1 on the Packers 19 midway through the 3rd quarter and Dak throws a terrible INT?

You can't just look at a single play at the end of a game and say that is why they lost. Part of the reason they lost was because they put themselves in a position during the game where it was possible for a single play to beat them and Dak was part of it.

I fully expect Dak to show us this season that he deserves to be considered elite. I believe he has it in him, he just hasn't done it yet.

I think with he Packers game....we have to ask ourselves what game was he suppose to have? He threw a pick. A bad pick for sure. But guys throw bad passes and picks in playoff games all the time. But the good teams are able to overcome them. But basically in the Packers game we asked Dak to not make any mistakes and make plays....just not realistic.

 

[Redline360]

Product of what environment? The one that won 4 games before he got there? They were 4-12 prior to him coming to Dallas….

Yes that's a prime example to us lol

Two backup quarterbacks on a wasted season. Romo got us 3 of those wins....

 

[Captain-Crash]

What's it called when people hold on to an opinion even after being proven wrong? i.e. Dak is inaccurate, Dak doesnt beat winning teams, Dak doesn't throw down field.

another guy with comprehension problems. The guy asks what homerism was. sheesh

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Yes that's a prime example to us lol

Two backup quarterbacks on a wasted season. Romo got us 3 of those wins....

I understand that but I saw the Eagles win a Super Bowl with a backup QB. I saw the Giants win a SB...TWO OF THEM with Eli Manning.

I guess what I'm saying is if the team is so stacked.....shouldn't Weeden and Cassell have been enough? A real head coach was able to get 11 wins out of Cassell.......