Those videos of Aikman getting into people on the sidelines (even the coaches if needed) are missing big time today.We have a winner!
I agree. Aikman's demeanor in the locker room and on the field would have been a big benefit to some of the better Cowboys teams. Romo never had that quality. But the 1990s teams also had Emmitt and Michael Irvin, two other players who have the same competitive fire and unselfishness on the field.
He took some hard hits with a great OL.
And never more evident with his displeasure with Switzer's laid back approach and how the team started that playoff game in SF.I think we have a better shot in 2014 and 2016 simply because of the real, not fake, leadership that he would provide.
That's something the Cowboys have been lacking from the QB position since he retired.
Agree. That's leadership.Those videos of Aikman getting into people on the sidelines (even the coaches if needed) are missing big time today.
We haven't seen that fire since.
His rookie season was like watching a sacrifice. That PHL game was as nasty a game for a QB that I have ever seen, 11 sacks and 1 of them a body slam.Yah Aikman hung tough in the pocket when he knew he was going to get crushed. But that was usually when he was sitting in the pocket for a few seconds. If he got pressure quickly he was not good at escaping or throwing on the run.
Lets assume its not even a conversation with the teams from after the 90's up to Parcells. But do any of you feel that Aikman would have won a SB with the teams of Parcells, Wade, Garrett, MM?
Yah, Aikman wins no SB's without his all HOF team and Emmitt leading the way.
Lets assume its not even a conversation with the teams from after the 90's up to Parcells. But do any of you feel that Aikman would have won a SB with the teams of Parcells, Wade, Garrett, MM?
Lets assume its not even a conversation with the teams from after the 90's up to Parcells. But do any of you feel that Aikman would have won a SB with the teams of Parcells, Wade, Garrett, MM?
It’s tough to say. Pure speculative of course but I’d think any HOF caliber QB could have possibly take a couple of these teams further . Like in 2007, 2014 and 2016 for example. We were just a possession away in all of those from a championship appearance. Who knows if you get that far.Lets assume its not even a conversation with the teams from after the 90's up to Parcells. But do any of you feel that Aikman would have won a SB with the teams of Parcells, Wade, Garrett, MM?
The flip-side of that is that if Aikman was with Belichick instead of Tom Brady, Aikman might have won more Super Bowls than Brady.
Yes I do.
Aikman could have led the NFL in passing, or one of the top passers if they called the plays. But with Emmitt and the running game, they didn't need to pass as often as teams do today.
Troy once said, that never bothered him. They were winning. He said if he was told before any season, if he would not complete a pass all year, but they would win the SB. He said he would take that in a heartbeat. Or something like that.
It wasn’t bad OL in 2007 and in 2014 it was considered one of best OL in league. In between it was awful . But those two seasons were Romo’s best window.No, Aikman gets crushed on most of those Romo teams with a mediocre to bad line.
If Troy could have survived until 2014 that was a great OL and could have dominated on offense. Probably closer to a championship caliber offense we have had this era. And Romo’s most effective season .Aikman's OL had some of the best ever. Defense you could argue the same. RB was no slouch either. I'll give him the practice factor. Him and Irvin was so much on the same page they finished each other's sentence.
He came along at the perfect time.
Answer: No
2016 yes, very good chance