- Messages
- 78,800
- Reaction score
- 43,764
Sounds like he made the right decision.
You don't overpay.You draft replacements.It's pattern bargaining. Even just decent QBs are rare in the NFL, so you have to overpay to keep one. It's the name of the game.
All the power to you.Parsons is top talent, therefore will be deserving of the top money that he gets.
That's why I said you should only pay top money to top talent and not pay someone "just because it's their turn". Murray is not and will never be worth what he just got paid. I would have 100% allowed another team to make that mistake instead of being the team that makes it.
YupYou don't overpay.You draft replacements.
Speaking in terms of what it cost these days to have an above average, not elite QB.No.
Other teams making mistakes do not make me feel better about the Cowboys making mistakes.
by 2025 if Dak does not have more playoff wins , am not sure he will be paid anywhere close. his window to show what he can do will be judged by the next 2 seasons . by 2025 there will be more options and hot rookies available,.If Dak's agent would have taken $33. But with a short contract which the agent always wanted to double dip, he would be looking at a new extension right now as well. Currently he'll be a free agent in 2025 so in 2024 they'll need to get him signed to a new extension also.
I'd rather waste years trying to find an elite QB than waste years not even looking for an elite QB while paying an average QB elite QB money to do nothing.Speaking in terms of what it cost these days to have an above average, not elite QB.
I'd rather waste years trying to find an elite QB than waste years not even looking for an elite QB while paying an average QB elite QB money to do nothing.
You're not winning a Super Bowl either way, but at least in one scenario you're making an effort.
This might be the worst contract in the NFL now.
I highly doubt anybody at all believes Murray is worth what he is now being paid.
You're paying a QB everyone sees as somewhere around 12ish to 15ish the 2nd most per year.
I said it once and I'll say it again...
You should only pay top dollar for top talent, not because it's "their turn to get paid".
Who cares?So who's the qb if you don't pay him, you're moving on from a 12-15 qb in the league for an unknown? Are you willing to go in qb purgatory for years?
Who cares?
You're not winning with him anyways. The only thing you're guaranteeing is tying yourself up to a middle of the pack QB for the next 5 years and not even looking to upgrade the position.
You don't pay top dollar until you find a top QB. It's too much money to tie up in a middle of the pack player.
Simple.
Every team that doesn't currently have Mahomes, Allen, Rodgers, Brady, Burrow, Herbert, or Stafford should be looking to upgrade the position UNLESS you have a really young guy on a rookie contract you believe in.You may not be winning now, but many think you can win with him. You at least want to try and be in the hunt and not the bottom of the league because you're getting fired if you're the gm in that case
Dak is above average my almost any metric you want to use.I'd rather waste years trying to find an elite QB than waste years not even looking for an elite QB while paying an average QB elite QB money to do nothing.
You're not winning a Super Bowl either way, but at least in one scenario you're making an effort.
You don't overpay.You draft replacements.