Dak for Aaron Rodgers

Lol. He's almost 40 with only one Superbowl to show in 16 years. He's the King of the "elites", oh wait....:lmao2:
 
Ignoring the actual talent levels of the QBs for a moment, You will instantly take a 100m$ cap hit by trading Dak before the deadline. Then you have to pay Rodgers his 50m$ a year.

On top of that, Arod is 39 years old. You’re trading for a guy who’ll starting for you for… 12 games before he retires? Maybe 30ish?
 
Ignoring the actual talent levels of the QBs for a moment, You will instantly take a 100m$ cap hit by trading Dak before the deadline. Then you have to pay Rodgers his 50m$ a year.

On top of that, Arod is 39 years old. You’re trading for a guy who’ll starting for you for… 12 games before he retires? Maybe 30ish?
The contracts are part of the trade of course.

With this D, you guarantee a Super Bowl this year.
That’s the trade off.

Mediocre Dak for three more years, or 1-2 years of Rodgers.
 
As someone who isn’t at all opposed to looking at other option once dak becomes a viable cut option…..this is a ridiculous idea.
 
Ignoring the actual talent levels of the QBs for a moment, You will instantly take a 100m$ cap hit by trading Dak before the deadline. Then you have to pay Rodgers his 50m$ a year.

On top of that, Arod is 39 years old. You’re trading for a guy who’ll starting for you for… 12 games before he retires? Maybe 30ish?
I have to hope he at least means, "with no cap ramifications".
 
The contracts are part of the trade of course.

With this D, you guarantee a Super Bowl this year.
That’s the trade off.
How do you guarantee a Super Bowl this year. You have a QB battling a hand injury, showing signs of aging, and asking him to learn a new system with new players on the fly. This ain’t madden.
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
465,465
Messages
13,876,800
Members
23,791
Latest member
mashburn
Back
Top