It literally does excuse it.
They had higher offers and would have to eat his cap. Taking his whole contract off the books means a lower pick. I don’t know why people don’t comprehend this
It’s really simpleIt literally does excuse it.
They had higher offers and would have to eat his cap. Taking his whole contract off the books means a lower pick. I don’t know why people don’t comprehend this
What would we be?If we kept Cooper or ate the salary we would not be 6-2.
That's what happens when you put Jerry and Stephen calling the shots. They sure know what they’re doing.
It’s really simple
Fans don’t factor in contracts and that’s the biggest driver of comp in a trade behind talent
If we kept Cooper or ate the salary we would not be 6-2.
Sounds like they sold his contract instead of actually trading him. You sell a players contract there's like an unwritten rule in the NFL...nothing higher than a fourth will be given for that type of deal. So a 5th does make sense now.It literally does excuse it.
They had higher offers and would have to eat his cap. Taking his whole contract off the books means a lower pick. I don’t know why people don’t comprehend this
One of the worst trades in recent years from any team
Obviously nobody made that kind of offer for Cooper.What did the Chiefs get for Hill?
What did the Packers get for Adams?
Were those also 5th round picks?
Not true. They coulda restructured his deal and let Gallup walk. Now whoever they sign or trade for plus Gallup will be more money than what it woulda cost to keep CoopIt literally does excuse it.
They had higher offers and would have to eat his cap. Taking his whole contract off the books means a lower pick. I don’t know why people don’t comprehend this
It’s really simple
Fans don’t factor in contracts and that’s the biggest driver of comp in a trade behind talent
Obviously nobody made that kind of offer for Cooper.