Would a single NFL team trade for Dak right now?

Status
Not open for further replies.

baltcowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,072
Reaction score
16,804
Texans and Lions both have 2 1st round picks so they make sense. Use 1 to package the trade and use 1 to add another first round talent in their build.

Saints have a good defense and weapons just need a QB.
Dak has plenty of suitors. He was not one of the highest paid players in football because Jerry was giving money away.
 

Typhus

Captain Catfish
Messages
19,786
Reaction score
22,663
That wasn't his question.
Is there a NFL team that would trade for Dak if they could?
Ok lets play this game, would Washington?
Heincke is clearly better already.
Would Detroit, nope they have Goff.
Maybe Atlanta that is stuck with the same QB talent that we have, but this is a fantasy topic so maybe Dak would be a better option than Mariota.
That is the ugly reality if that was what you were looking for, I just provided the obvious for you, in fantasy land.
 

fivetwos

Well-Known Member
Messages
19,261
Reaction score
26,168
The colts have traded for wentz and Ryan the last couple of years. You think they wouldn’t entertain a dak deal?
I scroll through this whole thing to make sure no one had my same first reaction….and you get me by nine minutes….nice work lol.
 

cnuball21

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,117
Reaction score
9,258
Dak has plenty of suitors. He was not one of the highest paid players in football because Jerry was giving money away.

I imagine the Lions fans that wanted Stafford gone probably thought they’d get nothing for him…

I don’t want to trade him, but if we did, I’m sure teams would express interest.
 

thunderpimp91

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,038
Reaction score
15,249
Ok lets play this game, would Washington?
Heincke is clearly better already.
Would Detroit, nope they have Goff.
Maybe Atlanta that is stuck with the same QB talent that we have, but this is a fantasy topic so maybe Dak would be a better option than Mariota.
That is the ugly reality if that was what you were looking for, I just provided the obvious for you, in fantasy land.
Ok you lost me with Heinicke is clearly better….Goff I think is a reasonable debate. Atlanta could be interested if their rookie isn’t showing anything in practice.

now let’s do Houston, Indy, Carolina. I’d argue maybe even a team like New England.

The cowboys will get plenty of interest in trading dak, but dak has to approve it and they have to be willing to suffer that cap hit which is what makes it unlikely.
 

Shane612

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,307
Reaction score
5,088
Ok lets play this game, would Washington?
Heincke is clearly better already.
Would Detroit, nope they have Goff.
Maybe Atlanta that is stuck with the same QB talent that we have, but this is a fantasy topic so maybe Dak would be a better option than Mariota.
That is the ugly reality if that was what you were looking for, I just provided the obvious for you, in fantasy land.
I'm agreeing with you...
 

MysteryIceGuro

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,736
Reaction score
15,698
No team is dumb enough to take on this putrid QB. He can’t read the defense, is extremely cocky and arrogant as he changes the plays at the line of scrimmage from run to pass, throws too many interceptions, gets hurt way to often, and absorbs too much of the cap. Not to mention he’s not even clutch. He doesn’t make big enough plays to warrant his interceptions. How many TD’s has he thrown for this season? 4? Disgusting.

If we take majority of the hit of the cap, an extremely desperate team might take him on as a backup
 

conner01

Well-Known Member
Messages
27,950
Reaction score
25,849
Clearly it’s not going to happen and we that already know the answer is hell no, I’m interested in the Dak maniacs and what team and trade package the cows could get for good ole’ noodle arm.
Here is a couple of other QB’s no team would trade for
Mahomes and Allen
Not because they aren’t great but because it would destroy both teams making the trade
The trading teams cap and recieving teams drafts for years
A player that can’t be traded has little to do with talent and everything to do with contract and costs
 

JBS

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,504
Reaction score
22,111
You are beyond clueless if you think the answer to this question is no. Like stupid is being generous.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top