Dak has been lights out

[starfan1]

Funny, you suggest I scroll on by and stop being a troll.....yet here you are replying to me......thanks for the advice troll but next time just scroll on by.

Ya mad troll at the W yesterday? I bet you were mad as heck when he was player of the game

 

[USArmyVet]

Your emotional Dak hatred knows no bounds of dumb.

So posting stats is hatred? Get a life Wormser.

 

[USArmyVet]

100%!!! but he is pretty vocal hater. You are not as high on Dak as some either but I don’t see you in near the amount of critic participation as him
I also have seen you be reasonable something I rarely if ever see with him so I call it out
It’s quite possible he has me on ignore by now as he thinks I’m an apologist when Dak is actually about 5th or 6th on my like list
I just defy the logic of hes what’s holding us back

Unlike those that get butthurt, I do not ignore people in this group.

 

[RustyBourneHorse]

I loved what he did in the second half. He was outstanding in the second half. The first interception, I'm not too upset about as I did think the Giants jumped offsides at first, and it seems the team did too. The second one should have been DPI. So, all in all, yeah, he played pretty well.

 

[USArmyVet]

Ya mad troll at the W yesterday? I bet you were I mad as heck when he was player of the game

Dak being player of the game after 2 INT's and an average performance shows you the pathetic standards and attempts to elevate Dak to something he will never be.

 

[starfan1]

Unlike those that get butthurt, I do not ignore people in this group.

Me either although some make it hard. I’d much rather call out their hypocrisy

 

[GINeric]

I can't speak for anyone in this group, much like you can't speak for those Dak fans that disappeared after the GB game.

That wouldn't make sense for them to disappear after he played good enough for us to win by leading us to a 14 point cushion that was squandered and game loss by the defense. Again, you're not making any sense with that one.

But you're definitely qualified to speak for the cowards that hate on Dak, but hide when he plays well. I'm not saying you're a coward because you do post when Dak plays well and I know that's hard for you to do, but I respect your courage to continue to post after our victories.

No respect for those Dak hatin, low IQ cowards who only come around after losses. Tell them we said hello!!

 

[starfan1]

Dak being player of the game after 2 INT's and an average performance shows you the pathetic standards and attempts to elevate Dak to something he will never be.

well I’ll say this . I would have given it to CeeDee or parsons maybe zeke over Dak even Shultz but he was only average in first half

he was on point in half 2. Even a troll like you can admit that right ?

Or will you focus on him missing a wide open pollard on the CeeDee throw in end zone

And how much did the giants d play a role?

The first half they were getting after it that #5 was killing our rook and Lenard Williams was extremely disruptive
That don’t excuse the 2 picks though

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

"lights out" is a bit far fected.

If we're going to win 4 playoff games in a row we're going to need better from him.

We're going need the "take what the defense gives you" Dak that we saw against the Vikings and not the "I'm going to try to be Mahomes" Dak we saw in the first half of the Giants game.

 

[USArmyVet]

That wouldn't make sense for them to disappear after he played good enough for us to win by leading us to a 14 point cushion that was squandered and game loss by the defense. Again, you're not making any sense with that one.

But you're definitely qualified to speak for the cowards that hate on Dak, but hide when he plays well. I'm not saying you're a coward because you do post when Dak plays well and I know that's hard for you to do, but I respect your courage to continue to post after our victories.

No respect for those Dak hatin, low IQ cowards who only come around after losses. Tell them we said hello!!

Just a bit of advice: stop the childish name calling and stereotyping and you are more likely to have better dialogue in the group.

 

[mardwin]

10 TD's 6 INT's 4-2 record

Oh yeah, he has been 'lights out' alright.

LOL The bar keeps getting lowered for Dak by some in the group.

If it wasn't for this defense his record would be worse.

Dak is better than Rush because of how arm velocity not because his accuracy or vision.. This team should lean on the run to help Dak be more proficient.

 

[USArmyVet]

well I’ll say this . I would have given it to CeeDee or parsons maybe zeke over Dak even Shultz but he was only average in first half

he was on point in half 2. Even a troll like you can admit that right ?

Or will you focus on him missing a wide open pollard on the CeeDee throw in end zone

And how much did the giants d play a role?

The first half they were getting after it that #5 was killing our rook and Lenard Williams was extremely disruptive
That don’t excuse the 2 picks though

"Troll like me"??? The immaturity is unnecessary but seems consistent with those that herald Dak.

 

[GoldenR]

He throws picks against Tampa, 49ers, or Eagles and we are going home in the first round. And we could see 2 of 3 those teams right away.

 

[lukemartin79]

I think his best game ever was against the 8-1 Vikings. More on that in a minute,

I think the critics of him in the SF game and then Bucs game to start the season were off. “Can’t win against good teams”

I think the Bucs was a lack of preseason practice. I think the SF game was that he knew cee dee was a poor route runner (he rarely targeted one on one matchups) and didn’t want to lose the game on turn overs early. Dak does not like poor route runners. CeeDee has improved late this year, but last year, he was a bit of a liability. Plus, Dak and Zeke were banged up late last year.

Back to the Vikes. So he he plays a highly successful team in the Vikings and carves them up. He follows up with a very good game against a 7 win NYG team. He is beating good teams.

QB1 has been great.

Whoever is QB for the Cowboys will always be judged on playoffs, SuprBowls. Romo was a damn good QB, but he didn't win in the playoffs so is slammed on this forum all the time. Until Dak does it, he will be a constant whipping boy on here.

 

[G2]

So posting stats is hatred? Get a life Wormser.

You derailed a long time ago. It's sad to see some try so hard after a huge win.

 

[bigE79]

100%!!! but he is pretty vocal hater. You are not as high on Dak as some either but I don’t see you in near the amount of critic participation as him
I also have seen you be reasonable something I rarely if ever see with him so I call it out
It’s quite possible he has me on ignore by now as he thinks I’m an apologist when Dak is actually about 5th or 6th on my like list
I just defy the logic of hes what’s holding us back

Put it like this, until dak can win in the playoffs,he will be judged poorly, regardless of his regular season stats,just like Romo was, unfairly as it may seem to some, winning in the playoffs is the measuring stick..for instance,I think Eli was very average but he won in the playoffs and sbs,Trent dilfer,Joe flacco..all very average SB winning QBs... until Dak can accomplish any playoff success, he'll be remembered as just another qb who played decent yet won nothing.

 

[starfan1]

Put it like this, until dak can win in the playoffs,he will be judged poorly, regardless of his regular season stats,just like Romo was, unfairly as it may seem to some, winning in the playoffs is the measuring stick..for instance,I think Eli was very average but he won in the playoffs and sbs,Trent dilfer,Joe flacco..all very average SB winning QBs... until Dak can accomplish any playoff success, he'll be remembered as just another qb who played decent yet won nothing.

They are literally the same qb he and Romo failed by the same owner gm
I’ll say this as well I agree with your average assessment on Eli and Flacco but they both had pretty solid playoff runs

 

[USArmyVet]

You derailed a long time ago. It's sad to see some try so hard after a huge win.

Reminds me how hard some try to elevate Dak for average performances while also placing blame on everyone but Dak in losses.

 

[GINeric]

Just a bit of advice: stop the childish name calling and stereotyping and you are more likely to have better dialogue in the group.

Bit of advice.... when people come around and talk trash about players after losses BUT hide and don't come around after wins.... those people are childish cowards, period. That's not stereotyping or name calling, that's called identifying who and what they are based off of their actions.

I got great dialogue with smart and intelligent fans here and some support our players, some don't. Atleast they are man and woman enough to give credit at times where credit's due. Whether we agree or disagree, I respect those posters. I could care less who chooses not to have dialogue with me. My life is still going to be great lol!!

But I do not respect posters who hide when we win and lie on players without producing facts/statistics or links to back up their baseless arguments. It's childish for those cowards to do those things.

 

[Aven8]

He actually looks like he’s got John Kitna at QB coach again. He’s being very aggressive