Article: Elon Musk Offers To Buy Twitter

Reality

Staff member
Messages
30,478
Reaction score
69,398
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
He’s already reinstated the journalists he banned the other day. Lol. I guess “doxxing” and his safety are no longer an issue.
Since he unbanned people that were banned before he bought Twitter based on a twitter poll, I am guessing he tied the unbanning of the journalists to a twitter poll as well to show his "fairness". In any case, I am sure it was more about sending a message than permanently banning people.

The overreactions though by the people banned reminded me a lot of flopping-for-fouls in sports. They knew exactly what they were doing and they wanted to get banned so they could create and become the story rather than report on it.

I really think both sides are playing for attention and support, but it is fun to watch regardless ...:D
 

Reality

Staff member
Messages
30,478
Reaction score
69,398
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Only cost him $44 billion!

:lmao:

And any credibility he may have had.
Elon did not pay $44 billion himself, there were other investors to helped pay for it so it is probably nothing to him if it goes under.

As for credibility, he's probably rich enough he does not have to care or at least he seems to act like it.

Either way though, it's still a bad look and there are much better ways to handle things than to put yourself on the throne while reminding everyone its your throne every single day in new and interesting ways.
 

Stash

Staff member
Messages
78,331
Reaction score
102,213
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Elon did not pay $44 billion himself, there were other investors to helped pay for it so it is probably nothing to him if it goes under.

He really got other people to put up money so he could burn the place down? Wow. They have to be even dumber than he is.

As for credibility, he's probably rich enough he does not have to care or at least he seems to act like it.

He certainly was. But these antics have cost him everywhere. Even Tesla and his other ventures have suffered.

Either way though, it's still a bad look and there are much better ways to handle things than to put yourself on the throne while reminding everyone its your throne every single day in new and interesting ways.

One of the greatest examples of self sabotage in history.

From this:

giphy.gif


To this:

joker-money.gif
 

Robbieac

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,796
Reaction score
3,427
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
It’s sad that George Orwell’s 1984 was becoming reality with Twitter over the last few years.

But all anyone seems to be concerned about is a Billionaire’s credibility and personal conduct.

Sad times indeed….
We need to get out priorities straight.


Even if he does burn Twitter to the ground, society will be better off without it!
 

Stash

Staff member
Messages
78,331
Reaction score
102,213
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
It’s sad that George Orwell’s 1984 was becoming reality with Twitter over the last few years.

But all anyone seems to be concerned about is a Billionaire’s credibility and personal conduct.

Sad times indeed….
We need to get out priorities straight.


Even if he does burn Twitter to the ground, society will be better off without it!

On this point we can agree. I think social media can bring out the best and the worst in people.
 

Reality

Staff member
Messages
30,478
Reaction score
69,398
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
It's really a genius move on his part when you think about it, because whoever he brings in next to be CEO will be someone he can control yet the users will think "we won! we won!" with him leaving.

In any case, I never expected him to remain Twitter CEO for very long. In fact, I was surprised he took on the role to start with, but now I see why. He got to enjoy the attention and now he can do what he always planned to do by hiring someone else to be CEO while making Twitter users think it was their idea.

That way he can rid himself of the day-to-day hassles of running a company like Twitter while making the users think it's "their service" while he continues making the big decisions behind the curtain.
 

Robbieac

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,796
Reaction score
3,427
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
It's really a genius move on his part when you think about it, because whoever he brings in next to be CEO will be someone he can control yet the users will think "we won! we won!" with him leaving.

In any case, I never expected him to remain Twitter CEO for very long. In fact, I was surprised he took on the role to start with, but now I see why. He got to enjoy the attention and now he can do what he always planned to do by hiring someone else to be CEO while making Twitter users think it was their idea.

That way he can rid himself of the day-to-day hassles of running a company like Twitter while making the users think it's "their service" while he continues making the big decisions behind the curtain.
Exactly.

Elon is always paying chess while everyone else thinks that they are winning at Go Fish.

Checkmate!
 

Stash

Staff member
Messages
78,331
Reaction score
102,213
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
It's really a genius move on his part when you think about it, because whoever he brings in next to be CEO will be someone he can control yet the users will think "we won! we won!" with him leaving.

The thought occurred to me that this was all part of his exit strategy and a way out for him. Now he can claim that he listened to the people and gave them what they wanted, even if he’s still pulling the strings behind the curtain.

In any case, I never expected him to remain Twitter CEO for very long. In fact, I was surprised he took on the role to start with, but now I see why. He got to enjoy the attention and now he can do what he always planned to do by hiring someone else to be CEO while making Twitter users think it was their idea.

That way he can rid himself of the day-to-day hassles of running a company like Twitter while making the users think it's "their service" while he continues making the big decisions behind the curtain.

That’s funny, I literally said this same thing before I read the second portion of your response. We’re totally on the same page here.
 

Reality

Staff member
Messages
30,478
Reaction score
69,398
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
The thought occurred to me that this was all part of his exit strategy and a way out for him. Now he can claim that he listened to the people and gave them what they wanted, even if he’s still pulling the strings behind the curtain.



That’s funny, I literally said this same thing before I read the second portion of your response. We’re totally on the same page here.
It will be funny if what happened to Jack Dorsey happens to Musk though. Jack stepped down as CEO and stayed on the board, but the moment he stepped down, the board and officers basically quit listening to him.
 

Stash

Staff member
Messages
78,331
Reaction score
102,213
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
It will be funny if what happened to Jack Dorsey happens to Musk though. Jack stepped down as CEO and stayed on the board, but the moment he stepped down, the board and officers basically quit listening to him.

I think Musk needs to distance himself as much as possible. Both publicly and privately. His direct involvement has proven to be a disaster and it’s hurt him everywhere. And he’s gotten himself mired in nonsense, distracting him from more important, real world stuff.

I’ll be interested to see if he actually CAN take that step back or if he’s addicted to the Twitter nonsense and attention at this point.
 

RJ_MacReady

It's all in the reflexes
Messages
3,952
Reaction score
7,084
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
It will be funny if what happened to Jack Dorsey happens to Musk though. Jack stepped down as CEO and stayed on the board, but the moment he stepped down, the board and officers basically quit listening to him.
Elon is waaaay too much of a micromanager to be completely hands-off. The CEO will fill more of a role like a Press Secretary. They're paid just to stand there and take the kicks and punches..
 

DoctorChicken

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,612
Reaction score
16,856
This situation is very interesting to watch from the sidelines as someone who has really never used Twitter. It’s funny just how much attention Elon craves, how much he wants his ego stroked, and how many people are so willing to do it for him.

I like the way he deleted that poll the other day after he didn't get the result he wanted. Definitely a champion of free speech.

Then he said only those with blue check marks will be able to vote on similar polls in the future. What a lover of free speech this humble man is.
 

Robbieac

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,796
Reaction score
3,427
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
I like the way he deleted that poll the other day after he didn't get the result he wanted. Definitely a champion of free speech.

Then he said only those with blue check marks will be able to vote on similar polls in the future. What a lover of free speech this humble man is.
Yet, any perceived negatives that he’s done is nothing compared to what was previously occurring at Twitter.

The difference is literally night and day…..for anyone willing to be honest.
 

DoctorChicken

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,612
Reaction score
16,856
Yet, any perceived negatives that he’s done is nothing compared to what was previously occurring at Twitter.

The difference is literally night and day…..for anyone willing to be honest.

Yeah, no. I’m willing to be honest and I strongly disagree.

If you’re talking from the perspective of someone who is a fan of him and his viewpoints, sure. But I’m not a fan of him or his viewpoints on many subjects.

I also think it’s hilarious people still think he’s a champion of free speech even though that has been proven to be false.

From what I have observed, Twitter is becoming even more of an echo chamber since Musk took over, and I am definitely not the only person to see that.
 
Last edited:

DoctorChicken

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,612
Reaction score
16,856
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Hey <a href="https://twitter.com/elonmusk?ref_src=twsrc^tfw">@elonmusk</a>, it’s unwise to run a poll like this when you are now deep state enemy #1. They have the biggest bot army on Twitter. They have 100k ‘analysts’ with 30-40 accounts all voting against you. Let’s clean up and then run this poll again. The majority has faith in you. <a href="https://t.co/y2piyeE84a">https://t.co/y2piyeE84a</a></p>&mdash; Kim Dotcom (@KimDotcom) <a href="">December 19, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


Oh, ok, so some deep state BS. Got it. I thought politics weren't allowed on this forum?

Am I in the deep state because I think Elon Musk is a crybaby?
 

DoctorChicken

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,612
Reaction score
16,856
Thats not about politics. That post is explaining why Musk is now requiring accounts to have a checkmark to vote. It’s because of all the bots.

But don’t let me get in the way of your anti-Musk bad man rant.

Do you believe it is possible that Musk fans are more likely to buy the blue check mark than others, therefore swaying the outcome of said polls?

I don’t recall ever ranting.
 
Top