Picking a team with Kenny Pickett at QB. You gotta take your medicine
What do you mean Nah. There is nothing that tells that is clearly out of bounds.
It doesn’t need to be clearly out of bounds, it only needs to be not clearly in bounds as was his claimWhat do you mean Nah. There is nothing that tells that is clearly out of bounds.
Yes it does or he's not out of boundsIt doesn’t need to be clearly out of bounds, it only needs to be not clearly in bounds as was his claim
If it’s iffy it’s up to the ref’s discretion. It’s also not clearly inbounds so how do you call inbounds?Yes it does or he's not out of bounds
You don't know what you are talking about. You need to move on.If it’s iffy it’s up to the ref’s discretion. It’s also not clearly inbounds so how do you call inbounds?
You’re saying that because you know I’m right and don’t want to admit it. Replay has to be indisputable to overturn, and we both agree it was not.You don't know what you are talking about. You need to move on.
Aero is correct in this… I think maybe you need to move on lolYou don't know what you are talking about. You need to move on.
No he's not. There is no definitive evidence that his foot his out of bounds. You don't know what you are talking about either. Neither you nor him is going to change my mind but you keep trying to very unsuccessfully.Aero is correct in this… I think maybe you need to move on lol
And no one ever said there was definitive evidence. This is called “strawmanning”. You’re creating an argument separate from the original so you can debate against your strawman.No he's not. There is no definitive evidence that his foot his out of bounds. You don't know what you are talking about either. Neither you nor him is going to change my mind but you keep trying to very unsuccessfully.