Dak or Kirk

Imagine Kirk taking a sack on a last minute hail Mary play like he did vs KC
 
Same player.

Pass on both. Neither is a big game player.


Try Lance and go for upside. If it fails draft.

Mediocrity is not the goal.
Trey Lance isn't ready to play.

He wasn't ready to play with the very best roster in football, even with 2+ years of watching and learning. Sam Darnold beat him out!!!

You can ruin a QB by playing him too early. Let him sit until next year.
 
A better question is would you rather pay one of those 2 guys $50m a year or sign someone younger and cheaper and fill out the roster with the other $40m plus you save?
 
True that was probably Daks best game. What did he throw barely over 50% and slightly for over 100 yards? He didn’t have any TDs but you’re right, at least he didn’t give the game away either.

Bravo!
I asked about Dak LAST YEAR vs the Giants, and you brought up this year again?

The 40-0 game?
:lmao2: :lmao2: :lmao2:

Imagine trying to dismiss an 11-game win streak vs a single opponent.

All because Kirk s*** the bed at home vs that same opponent in the playoffs, and you're desperately trying to pretend Dak's worse than he is.
:lmao2: :lmao2: :lmao2:
 
Kirk has never had the OL Dak has had or the defense Dak had the last 3 years. His mechanics and throws are way better and he actually won in the play-offs in OT, unlike scrub Dak who needs a 14 pt lead given by the defense to not completely suck.
 
Kirk has never had the OL Dak has had or the defense Dak had the last 3 years. His mechanics and throws are way better and he actually won in the play-offs in OT, unlike scrub Dak who needs a 14 pt lead given by the defense to not completely suck.
LMAAOOOOO

How'd Kirk do the last time we saw him in the playoffs again?

Oh, he lost at home to the team that Dak COMPLETELY OWNS?
:lmao2::lmao2::lmao2:
 
Kirk's better because you say so. Got it.

No matter what actually happens on the field.
:lmao2: :lmao2: :lmao2:


They both are guys that you just want to stay relevant so there is a buzz around your team but give you no real shot at winning anything unless they’re on their rookie deal.


A team serious about wanting to win a championship should not have Dak Prescott or Kirk Cousins as their QB.
 
Yes.

Kirk is better because I say so.

Just like I've told you for years Dak is a bum.

So I know more than you about this.

You'd do much better to just listen.
You're dead wrong on all accounts, as usual.

I always told you Dak's good but not elite.

Turns out NFL personnel agreed with me, and hey, so do the stats!!!

https://www.espn.com/nfl/qbr

I know, I know.

I'm wrong, the stats are wrong, the W/L record is wrong, NFL players are wrong, NFL coaches are wrong, NFL execs are wrong and NFL scouts are wrong.

All so you can pretend you're right.
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
 
You're dead wrong on all accounts, as usual.

I always told you Dak's good but not elite.

Turns out NFL personnel agreed with me, and hey, so do the stats!!!

https://www.espn.com/nfl/qbr

I know, I know.

I'm wrong, the stats are wrong, the W/L record is wrong, NFL players are wrong, NFL coaches are wrong, NFL execs are wrong and NFL scouts are wrong.
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
I know more than you.

Check our receipts.

You're so shook by it you've given up on the "DURs"
 
They both are guys that you just want to stay relevant so there is a buzz around your team but give you no real shot at winning anything unless they’re on their rookie deal.


A team serious about wanting to win a championship should not have Dak Prescott or Kirk Cousins as their QB.
If the NFL operated the way you think it should, there would be 3-5 elite QBs and 27-29 developmental QBs starting on Sundays.
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
 
I know more than you.

Check our receipts.

You're so shook by it you've given up on the "DURs"
Tell me what I was wrong about.

Go right ahead. I'm all ears.

You'll respond with nothing of substance. I guarantee it.

You have nothing and you know it.

Meanwhile, I have actual data and collective opinions of NFL personnel proving that you're totally clueless.
:laugh::laugh::laugh:
 
36950.jpg
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,389
Messages
13,871,623
Members
23,790
Latest member
MisterWaffles
Back
Top