PFF: Teams with the lowest first-down conversion rate allowed

Hawkeye0202

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,560
Reaction score
43,333
But when it comes to the Cowboys offense, it is near the bottom of the league on first down conversion rate on first and second down....that's NOT so "Special"
True but we are like the top 3 in points scored......look, I'm not saying we are there yet but there are a lot of good things trending in the right direction.
 

pansophy

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,022
Reaction score
4,125
How many first downs have they given up before 3rd down?
 

kskboys

Well-Known Member
Messages
44,873
Reaction score
47,689
Our D is not bad. What we still lack is that dominant 3 tech. That one piece would vault us into #1 D territory.

And if Mazi doesn't pan out, we're going to need another 1 tech if Hankins walks.
 

Staubacher

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,471
Reaction score
21,677
True but we are like the top 3 in points scored......look, I'm not saying we are there yet but there are a lot of good things trending in the right direction.
Trending towards early playoff exit at best
 

Creeper

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,148
Reaction score
17,968
At first I misunderstood this stat. But aparently it is teh rate that other teams get first downs when they have the football. According to my calculation Dallas has given up the 2nd fewest first downs in the league behind Cleveland. But Dallas and Cleveland have on 8 games vs 9 for New Orleans and Baltimore. This stat is a measurement of the number of 1st downs per set of downs so the number of games is irrelevant.

This is an impressive stat but the 5-3 record shows the Cowboys have had some really good games and some not so good games. The Eagles had 20 first downs against Dallas, 10 passes, 7 rushes, and 3 penalty. The problem for Dallas is most of those 1st downs came on 4 TD drives - which shows that first downs is less important than rate of scoring drives allowed.
 

kskboys

Well-Known Member
Messages
44,873
Reaction score
47,689
It is completely irrelevant that/if we haven't allowed one single player to rush/receive for 100 yds. ARI rushed for 222 yds against. 222. So, instead of repeating the irrelevant stat that it wasn't one player, explain to me why it matters? 49ers rushed for 170. It's not a victory that it wasn't one player.
 

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
45,523
Reaction score
21,757
Trending towards early playoff exit at best
This is being blind to overcoming and even in the career of McCarthy in Super Bowl 45. He had 6 starters out and was ranked #6 before beating Pittsburgh...in Dallas and Flozell Adams starting at RT for the Steelers.
 

jazzcat22

Staff member
Messages
77,542
Reaction score
96,339
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I hate to be negative, but not sure how one would consider this year any different from the previous 2
Well, because it is a new season, and the ending has not been written yet.
Even though the Debbie Downers and Negative Nancies already decided on it. :laugh:
 

shabazz

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,084
Reaction score
31,429
BTW......correct me if I'm wrong but I think we have not allowed a 100-yard rusher or receiver so far
I think I’ve seen that same stat. Other teams have gotten plenty of yards but have spread it around among their various receivers. the Cowboys are Lamb-dependent and the drop off is vast after him

Guess which one is better……the lack of depth and productivity isn’t
 

CWR

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,743
Reaction score
34,545
But when it comes to the Cowboys offense, it is near the bottom of the league on first down conversion rate on first and second down....that's NOT so "Special"

We're killing it on 3rd and 4th then. However, that's tough to sustain. It has to he a hallmark of a poor running game though. Fix that, and those rates change dramatically
 
Top