The GM is supposed to get the talent; BUT the HC hires the staff and makes the callsThey’re all good in their own way. It’s about the GM way more than a coach.
The head coach does not necessarily hire the staff, just ask JerryThe GM is supposed to get the talent; BUT the HC hires the staff and makes the calls
Yeah its hard to perform for a lousy GM but it has been done.
So really who is your best HC in the NFL?
Without a good owner, a good GM, a head coach is not going to make a difference. That’s why we have problems here in Dallas. Depends what you’re looking for in a head coach. Do you want him to call defense, offense, plays . Strictly time management. What are you looking for in head coach? The question is just too vast.The GM is supposed to get the talent; BUT the HC hires the staff and makes the calls
Yeah its hard to perform for a lousy GM but it has been done.
So really who is your best HC in the NFL?
you look at the best HCs of the last twenty years and pretty much all of them are to a great extent like CEOsWithout a good owner, a good GM, a head coach is not going to make a difference. That’s why we have problems here in Dallas. Depends what you’re looking for in a head coach. Do you want him to call defense, offense, plays . Strictly time management. What are you looking for in head coach? The question is just too vast.
That is seemingly how it goes. HC success and QB success are closely correlated. You can be a good coach but not have the QB, won't succeed much. You can be a good QB but a terrible head coach, also won't succeed much.I am beginning to think they are as rare as really good QBs.
Reid obviously is king of the hill right now.
Who is #2?
This was forty years ago of course but Joe Gibbs won three SBs with three different QBs and none of them were all that.That is seemingly how it goes. HC success and QB success are closely correlated. You can be a good coach but not have the QB, won't succeed much. You can be a good QB but a terrible head coach, also won't succeed much.