He definitely has issues with lateral movement. I saw someone suggest a movie inside to G, which does make sense. His run blocking would be highlighted and his lateral movement issues in pass protection would be reduced greatly.
Problem is the money. He is far overpaid as a T and would be even more so as a G.
I know we are going with a line of Guyton/Smith/Beebe/Booker/Steele. (L to R)
I do wonder though if out T's struggle (like last year), if we wouldn't be better with Smith at LT (our best OL), Booker then at LG (where he played so well in college), Beebe at C, Steele at RG (where his run blocking can mbe maximized and his pass protection issue mitigated) and Guyton at RT (where he played in college).
Assuming Guyton and Steele struggle like last year (which is by no means guaranteed BTW), we would improve at LT (Guyton to Smith), Close at LG (Smith to Booker), same at C (Beebe), close at RG (Booker to Steele, assuming Steele's issues are mitigated by the move) and improved at RT (Steele to Guyton). Seems like we'd be much stronger at both T positions and very close at both G positions.