Purdy Didn't Have to Wait to Long For His Bag

[RonWashington]

So far we're not paying to stream NFL games. If it does happen, and I decide the product doesn't justify the cost, I'll stop watching. Same with fast food. I stopped watching boxing when they went PPV.

But here's the thing. Everyone saw the 49ers get to the SB with Purdy. So it's clear it can be done if you properly surround the QB that isn't great. But all QBs can't do that. It still takes some talent.

The surrounding talent that made that SF offense hum is starting elsewhere beginning with # 19 . Ricky Piersall the # 1 pick last yr seems a poor substitute

 

[RonWashington]

Believe me steaming will be the regular viewing of the NFL especially the playoffs . Free TV Fox CBS NBC will be the exception . Amazon already has Thurs night if your not Amazon Prime your SOL .

 

[FanofJerry]

Seems like this board is completely ignoring my posts regarding this topic...

The posters flood to hate on a situation, but when reality hits them in the face they go silent...it's a bad look.

Stable QBs is what wins games late...not great, deep teams.

It's the QB who, with 3 minutes left and down 2 touchdowns, that brings teams back into games. He does it with passing and stopped clocks. Running game can't do that.

With the parity in the league and a lot of games close....it's the QB at the end of close games that lifts his team.

It happens practically every other game...you can't deny it.

QB is so so important late in games...but this board doesn't want to focus on that...it wants to focus on hate.

Late in close games, it's a QB battle. Sure, it's a team game, he needs adequate blocking and good OC play calling, but it's the QBs that win these games more times than not.

My opinion is, GMs and Owners see this...and owners/gm's and agents all agree on the price of QBs.

Qbs are responsible for near half of the offensive plays since a lot of teams pass/run ratio is near 50%.

Qbs do more than any other position, then have the game fall in their lap late in close games.

This board is blinded by analytics and the talent/income flaw of the position....but Owners/GMs seem to have a food grasp on it.

ASSUMING ALL IS REAL, MOST GM'S WANT STABILITY...for viewing pleasure and for the ability to stay in games.

This board is just hell bent on some weird flaw in QB pay and wants it fixed, but there isn't a good avenue to fix it.

I'm not saying give up on being creative trying to fix it, I'm just saying GMs, with real issues, aren't doing what this board is suggesting

 

[gtb1943]

Seems like this board is completely ignoring my posts regarding this topic...

The posters flood to hate on a situation, but when reality hits them in the face they go silent...it's a bad look.

Stable QBs is what wins games late...not great, deep teams.

It's the QB who, with 3 minutes left and down 2 touchdowns, that brings teams back into games. He does it with passing and stopped clocks. Running game can't do that.

With the parity in the league and a lot of games close....it's the QB at the end of close games that lifts his team.

It happens practically every other game...you can't deny it.

QB is so so important late in games...but this board doesn't want to focus on that...it wants to focus on hate.

Late in close games, it's a QB battle. Sure, it's a team game, he needs adequate blocking and good OC play calling, but it's the QBs that win these games more times than not.

My opinion is, GMs and Owners see this...and owners/gm's and agents all agree on the price of QBs.

Qbs are responsible for near half of the offensive plays since a lot of teams pass/run ratio is near 50%.

Qbs do more than any other position, then have the game fall in their lap late in close games.

This board is blinded by analytics and the talent/income flaw of the position....but Owners/GMs seem to have a food grasp on it.

ASSUMING ALL IS REAL, MOST GM'S WANT STABILITY...for viewing pleasure and for the ability to stay in games.

This board is just hell bent on some weird flaw in QB pay and wants it fixed, but there isn't a good avenue to fix it.

I'm not saying give up on being creative trying to fix it, I'm just saying GMs, with real issues, aren't doing what this board is suggesting

just maybe your posts are not worth discussing

 

[kskboys]

Seems like this board is completely ignoring my posts regarding this topic...

The posters flood to hate on a situation, but when reality hits them in the face they go silent...it's a bad look.

Stable QBs is what wins games late...not great, deep teams.

It's the QB who, with 3 minutes left and down 2 touchdowns, that brings teams back into games. He does it with passing and stopped clocks. Running game can't do that.

With the parity in the league and a lot of games close....it's the QB at the end of close games that lifts his team.

It happens practically every other game...you can't deny it.

QB is so so important late in games...but this board doesn't want to focus on that...it wants to focus on hate.

Late in close games, it's a QB battle. Sure, it's a team game, he needs adequate blocking and good OC play calling, but it's the QBs that win these games more times than not.

My opinion is, GMs and Owners see this...and owners/gm's and agents all agree on the price of QBs.

Qbs are responsible for near half of the offensive plays since a lot of teams pass/run ratio is near 50%.

Qbs do more than any other position, then have the game fall in their lap late in close games.

This board is blinded by analytics and the talent/income flaw of the position....but Owners/GMs seem to have a food grasp on it.

ASSUMING ALL IS REAL, MOST GM'S WANT STABILITY...for viewing pleasure and for the ability to stay in games.

This board is just hell bent on some weird flaw in QB pay and wants it fixed, but there isn't a good avenue to fix it.

I'm not saying give up on being creative trying to fix it, I'm just saying GMs, with real issues, aren't doing what this board is suggesting

Sure, but what you're missing is that it takes a top D to even get there.

If you watched the superbowl and still don't comprehend what role the D plays, I can't help you.

 

[FanofJerry]

Seems like this board is completely ignoring my posts regarding this topic...

The posters flood to hate on a situation, but when reality hits them in the face they go silent...it's a bad look.

Stable QBs is what wins games late...not great, deep teams.

It's the QB who, with 3 minutes left and down 2 touchdowns, that brings teams back into games. He does it with passing and stopped clocks. Running game can't do that.

With the parity in the league and a lot of games close....it's the QB at the end of close games that lifts his team.

It happens practically every other game...you can't deny it.

QB is so so important late in games...but this board doesn't want to focus on that...it wants to focus on hate.

Late in close games, it's a QB battle. Sure, it's a team game, he needs adequate blocking and good OC play calling, but it's the QBs that win these games more times than not.

My opinion is, GMs and Owners see this...and owners/gm's and agents all agree on the price of QBs.

Qbs are responsible for near half of the offensive plays since a lot of teams pass/run ratio is near 50%.

Qbs do more than any other position, then have the game fall in their lap late in close games.

This board is blinded by analytics and the talent/income flaw of the position....but Owners/GMs seem to have a food grasp on it.

ASSUMING ALL IS REAL, MOST GM'S WANT STABILITY...for viewing pleasure and for the ability to stay in games.

This board is just hell bent on some weird flaw in QB pay and wants it fixed, but there isn't a good avenue to fix it.

I'm not saying give up on being creative trying to fix it, I'm just saying GMs, with real issues, aren't doing what this board is suggesting

Buehler

Buehler

 

[gtb1943]

Buehler

Buehler

no surprise at all

 

[Flamma]

The surrounding talent that made that SF offense hum is starting elsewhere beginning with # 19 . Ricky Piersall the # 1 pick last yr seems a poor substitute

Yes. We'll see Purdy come down to earth. But at least the 49ers are willing to surround him with the talent when possible. Do the Cowboys do the same with Dak? Did they do it with Romo?

 

[Flamma]

Believe me steaming will be the regular viewing of the NFL especially the playoffs . Free TV Fox CBS NBC will be the exception . Amazon already has Thurs night if your not Amazon Prime your SOL .

Right. But think about it, years ago all we got to see for the most part were local games. Before that they blacked out local games. You had to go to the stadium to watch. We are still by far better off today than yesteryear. Hell, I had to go to a sports bar several times to watch a Cowboys VS 49ers game in the early 90s. The 1985 matchup between the Cowboys and Bears wasn't nationally televised. Not that we wanted to see that. But today that would never happen.

Don't get me wrong. I can see a time where this becomes more PPV. Watch most of the regular season, but pay for playoffs as an example. They are currently testing that model out right now. They'll do it if they think it will succeed.

 

[Flamma]

Seems like this board is completely ignoring my posts regarding this topic...

The posters flood to hate on a situation, but when reality hits them in the face they go silent...it's a bad look.

Stable QBs is what wins games late...not great, deep teams.

It's the QB who, with 3 minutes left and down 2 touchdowns, that brings teams back into games. He does it with passing and stopped clocks. Running game can't do that.

With the parity in the league and a lot of games close....it's the QB at the end of close games that lifts his team.

It happens practically every other game...you can't deny it.

QB is so so important late in games...but this board doesn't want to focus on that...it wants to focus on hate.

Late in close games, it's a QB battle. Sure, it's a team game, he needs adequate blocking and good OC play calling, but it's the QBs that win these games more times than not.

My opinion is, GMs and Owners see this...and owners/gm's and agents all agree on the price of QBs.

Qbs are responsible for near half of the offensive plays since a lot of teams pass/run ratio is near 50%.

Qbs do more than any other position, then have the game fall in their lap late in close games.

This board is blinded by analytics and the talent/income flaw of the position....but Owners/GMs seem to have a food grasp on it.

ASSUMING ALL IS REAL, MOST GM'S WANT STABILITY...for viewing pleasure and for the ability to stay in games.

This board is just hell bent on some weird flaw in QB pay and wants it fixed, but there isn't a good avenue to fix it.

I'm not saying give up on being creative trying to fix it, I'm just saying GMs, with real issues, aren't doing what this board is suggesting

I don't disagree with you. But it's not only that. If it was just that, Dak would never have been paid, because he doesn't ever do that. Besides the game against Pitt last year and maybe Philly in 2016, how often does Dak lead a 2 minute drive to win? Hardly ever. On the flip side, Romo did it a lot. But ultimately where did that get us? No better than Dak.

 

[FanofJerry]

I don't disagree with you. But it's not only that. If it was just that, Dak would never have been paid, because he doesn't ever do that. Besides the game against Pitt last year and maybe Philly in 2016, how often does Dak lead a 2 minute drive to win? Hardly ever. On the flip side, Romo did it a lot. But ultimately where did that get us? No better than Dak.

A guy like Romo or someone that doesn't turn ball over with INTs is what GMs want.

Dak checks one of those boxes.

You know what's funny is, I see so many of these journeyman QBs that still have jobs choke late with INTs. It's why they are journeyman.

And this board is pounding the table to acquire one of these guys just to eliminate that stupid pay flaw with most QBs.

He may not be Romo, but this board will regret it when Dak leaves and we get a turnover machine behind center. Think of Romo choking in playoffs, but every other game ends in an INT late game.

It's a pick your poison kind of thing.

I prefer Daks low turnovers over being kicked in the grapes with an INT with 1 minute left every other game

 

[gtb1943]

A guy like Romo or someone that doesn't turn ball over with INTs is what GMs want.

Dak checks one of those boxes.

You know what's funny is, I see so many of these journeyman QBs that still have jobs choke late with INTs. It's why they are journeyman.

And this board is pounding the table to acquire one of these guys just to eliminate that stupid pay flaw with most QBs.

He may not be Romo, but this board will regret it when Dak leaves and we get a turnover machine behind center. Think of Romo choking in playoffs, but every other game ends in an INT late game.

It's a pick your poison kind of thing.

I prefer Daks low turnovers over being kicked in the grapes with an INT with 1 minute left every other game

Yeah those pick sixes dak throws in playoff games don;t matter

I always figured you were both a dak bot and a romo hater and you just proved it