No one is a disappointment.
Free country. You can judge, and then 1A says you get to tell everyone how you judged.
Doesn't make that judgment fair, just makes that judgment public.
Ownership is in a position that all of us fans can and should actually appreciate, given that the sport abides by a CBA that demands a hard cap on salaries. To the degree that they are able to limit salaries, they are better able to maneuver to maximize talent on the roster. That's a good thing, selfishly, for us fans. We should commend ownership for that effort.
The player is in a position that all of us common Joes and Janes who work for a living for an employer can and should actually appreciate, which is that everyone should work out the most beneficial compensation from their employer as they possibly can... because... that, in turn, justifies my own doing that same thing. To not commend the player for that effort is to demand "rules for thee, but not for me." And that's just inherently obtuse and selfish thinking. We should commend the player for that effort.
This is a process. Sure, people like having something to talk about, we all get that. But none of the talk matters. Neither side is wrong to pursue what they're pursuing. Neither side is a disappointment... except I suppose, for those who can't accept that and feel they need to so take a side and publicly disparage.
My .02. (I won't be coming back to this thread, incidentally. I'm already bored with it, and I've only read two posts.)