so poor decisions on RBs lead to drafting a RG in top of the draft to protect the QB instead of a defensive player...wouldn't it make sense to draft a good RB or sign a good one in FA as they were available. one poor decision leading to other poor decisions. and the results? we score 40 points and no win (yeah yeah yeah, and no loss).
and we had Bass in there and gave up an iffy, ticky tacky sack.....
Eagles spent a lot on Offense as well. very lopsided. but they have loaded on defense in draft. in fact this past draft coming of superbowl win, their first top 5 picks was defense.
so its not unusual to spend on one side more than the other. depends on timing and availability of players.
we drafted a RG in top 12!!! a freaking RG...I don't care how good he is and if he is future HOFer....tell me the names of the guards for the past 5 superbowl teams? without googling....
you don't win championships because of RG.