RustyBourneHorse
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 49,071
- Reaction score
- 57,202
I know this might be a controversial take, but, why couldn't we have Schotty earlier? I think he's been great.
Someone mentioned in another thread that he seems like a Sirianni without Roseman. I think that's fair, but he's more likeable. To me, maybe this is something he's developed over time, but I'm actually curious why we couldn't have him in, say, 2016, instead of Garrett at the time?
Some of the things I like about him that I've noticed:
To me, it's a shame we DIDN'T have him sooner. Can you imagine him when Dak was earlier in his career compared to Garrett? You mean to tell me 2016-2019 Schotty wouldn't be an upgrade over 2016-2019 Garrett?
Someone mentioned in another thread that he seems like a Sirianni without Roseman. I think that's fair, but he's more likeable. To me, maybe this is something he's developed over time, but I'm actually curious why we couldn't have him in, say, 2016, instead of Garrett at the time?
Some of the things I like about him that I've noticed:
- I think his clock management so far has been much better than Garrett and McCarthy (and I liked McCarthy).
- He's got less mind numbing bad decisions than the last two or three HCs we've had so far.
- He seems genuine. He seems to genuinely care about his players and the team. Sometimes, you can see the phoniness. How many times did we complain about Garrett seemed "plastic" and fake? I appreciate his genuineness.
- I like his feel for the game. He seems to have a good idea of when to go for it and when not to do that.
- I actually appreciated the way he disciplined Lamb and Pickens. It sends a message to the team that nobody is above the rules. How many times have we questioned the discipline of the team?
To me, it's a shame we DIDN'T have him sooner. Can you imagine him when Dak was earlier in his career compared to Garrett? You mean to tell me 2016-2019 Schotty wouldn't be an upgrade over 2016-2019 Garrett?

