Coogiguy03
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 47,387
- Reaction score
- 40,303
Hey is this sarcasm or is this how you really feel about meLOL, you are a fool. LOL

Hey is this sarcasm or is this how you really feel about meLOL, you are a fool. LOL

Hey is this sarcasm or is this how you really feel about me![]()
![]()
![]()
C'mon Whirlwin......there are many out there leading us to believe they view Dak playing KC by himself.You keep saying DAK teams, it’s cowboy teams. Kansas City suck this year, Mahomes sucks. Is that what you’re saying I don’t care what he’s done in the past right now.
Agree...it's how he responds to considerable pressure...he cracks. And he doesn't just crack on the play or the one drive...he's shot for the entire game.It's not just big games. The game against Arizona earlier that year was the same. We get down a few scores and he starts to play too cautious, and gets like a tunnel vision. The Packers and Cardinals did not have a great defense, but it looked like a struggle just to get a first down.
Me personally, I don't think we win that GB game if Kurt Warner was our QB. My main point is how our QB reacts under certain circumstances. I think he's been looking better this year.
Nah, that's only when Dak has a bad game. Otherwise, the success is all his...all praise due to Dak....You are correct but a lot of folks here will credit the defense.. the special teams.. the team doctor the head trainer... the cheerleaders before they credit Dak. It is what it is.
can i answer this one?Hey is this sarcasm or is this how you really feel about me![]()
![]()
![]()
Yeah it's a good thing Philly is not a good defense and that game Sunday was not a "big" game cause as you have stated many times Dak fails against good teams and in big games.. right?Nah, that's only when Dak has a bad game. Otherwise, the success is all his...all praise due to Dak....
Philly is both a good D and a good team.Yeah it's a good thing Philly is not a good defense and that game Sunday was not a "big" game cause as you have stated many times Dak fails against good teams and in big games.. right?
Always gotta shift the goal post eh? Was Green Bay a division foe? He had arguably a better game against them.. and their defense is even higher rated.Philly is both a good D and a good team.
But...they are also a division foe. If Dak's win vs Philly "proves something", why can't he do it again? He should have no problem playing this way 14 out of 17 Sundays, right?
Was GB a win? No...so...again...not the best example to use. Although it might have been Dak's best game of the year...still not good enough.Always gotta shift the goal post eh? Was Green Bay a division foe? He had arguably a better game against them.. and their defense is even higher rated.
Playing what way? 350 yards and 3 TDs 14 out of 17 Sundays? Seriously? So 5000 yards and 50 TDs in 14 games? If he does something that has never been done then all is forgiven? That's your take?
I thought this some time agoAfter a big win like this all of the Trolls are nowhere to be found . A thread like this might bring them out. Lol
Yea, there’s been plenty to bash Dak over the years and I’m sure there will be more . But anyone who doesn’t see he can be enough to win with has some serious agendas.
I’m not saying he’s Elite while he does look like it at times but we aren’t as good of offense without him.
And sure there’s a few QB’s we’d rather have but with this version of Dak we could be a tough out as long as this defense can make critical stops.
We have some huge games coming up against KC and Detroit. We’ll see how those go but I have a new found confidence we wouldn't have much chance without him.
Also still not his fault. Your premise was the he chokes and doesn't play well against good defenses and in big games. Not "the Cowboys never win" against good teams or big games. Either way both have been proven patently false time and again.Was GB a win? No...so...again...not the best example to use. Although it might have been Dak's best game of the year...still not good enough.
No...I said "that way". Meaning POISED, CONFIDENT AND CLEAR-EYED.
So Dak doesn't choke in big games? Is that your assertion?Also still not his fault. Your premise was the he chokes and doesn't play well against good defenses and in big games. Not "the Cowboys never win" against good teams or big games. Either way both have been proven patently false time and again.
As for the last sentence. That's a fair assessment.. However it's hard to understand the context when discussing a QB who has 23 TD passes to 7 INTs, is completing almost 70% of his passes and has passer ratings above 100 in 7 of his 11 starts and an 8th game (against the Giants that was 96.7). He has 6 games with zero turnovers and 3 others with just 1. The two games with more than one turnover were the Denver game where at least one was off a receiver's hands and the Chicago game where Pickens volleyballed an INT to the Bears when the Cowboys were moving to score and perhaps cut it to a one score game.
Dak also had nothing to do with Williams and Ferguson fumbling away scoring opportunities against the Cards. But people will cite that as a poor game for him. His INT in that game was 4th down heave at the end with the game out of reach thanks to the defense getting shredded by Jacoby Brissette and the aforementioned fumbles. Dak played fine in that game.. his teammates didn't. Especially the offensive line.. Not that Dak has played lights out every game.. but he has been very good way more than he has been bad. And that's really all we can ask for.
Well he sure as hell didn't choke against the Eagles or Green Bay.. though again I know that the goal post will shift so that those won't count..So Dak doesn't choke in big games? Is that your assertion?
