That was the going rate if you signed but there’s nothing to indicate Micah would’ve signed early especially for that. Now if they offered him 40 or 42? I could see that getting done. You were gonna have to massively overpay then to get it done. And I would’ve personally.If things were on the up and up that was the going rate. Malpractice not to try to sign your 3-time All-Pro.
I don’t disagree. But we know that’s not how Dallas operates. They wanted him to play on the tag eventually and sign him to a big deal. It’s how they handled Dak, Lawrence, etcVery possible but the attempt should have been made at the time to get him extended, and if Micah wasn’t willing to agree to the market rate that would have been the time to deal him.
We have to remember at the time Parsons made the so-called I don't have to be the highest paid player statement, it was offseason following his 3rd year. At the time I think the Browns made Garrett the highest paid defensive player at $35M. So yeah, Jerry could have signed him to a top 3 contract but they were more focused on getting Dak ( who had another year ) and Lamb done.Very possible but the attempt should have been made at the time to get him extended, and if Micah wasn’t willing to agree to the market rate that would have been the time to deal him.
The most recent deal was Bosa's. He could not have exceeded Bosa by much seeing as Bosa had just won DPOY over him. It was perfect timing to get a deal done and a built-in upper limit. They hesitated ....... again.That was the going rate if you signed but there’s nothing to indicate Micah would’ve signed early especially for that. Now if they offered him 40 or 42? I could see that getting done. You were gonna have to massively overpay then to get it done. And I would’ve personally.
A lot of “generational” talk. It was ridiculous.There were a ton of naysayers after the trade happened, screaming you don't give up that kind of player, especially when your D is weak. That's why overreactions to drafts/trades are very impulsive; seldom do these hot takes age well. The D was as bad without Micah last year as it was with him. We had to not pay his next contract, and the time to deal with him was ideal, due to the need to build an entire new D. The schenagigans he played during his time here grew old, and the injury risk is now heightened more than it was for a one-trick pony.
The Browns gave Garrett $40M.We have to remember at the time Parsons made the so-called I don't have to be the highest paid player statement, it was offseason following his 3rd year. At the time I think the Browns made Garrett the highest paid defensive player at $35M. So yeah, Jerry could have signed him to a top 3 contract but they were more focused on getting Dak ( who had another year ) and Lamb done.
Micah was just talking. At the time I bought it but seeing how he plays with the media for personal gain I realize now he was never taking 34. He believes he’s better than Myles Garrett and should get more.We have to remember at the time Parsons made the so-called I don't have to be the highest paid player statement, it was offseason following his 3rd year. At the time I think the Browns made Garrett the highest paid defensive player at $35M. So yeah, Jerry could have signed him to a top 3 contract but they were more focused on getting Dak ( who had another year ) and Lamb done.
If you think getting rid of Parsons was franchise altering, just think what could come from letting #4 hit the bricks when his next extension comes up. He's another person not worth overpaying and who has limitations in his game.Yep, and none of what I wrote even mentioned Caleb Downs.
Health aside, this could be a franchise altering offseason that resulted from tl not overpaying a single player who had limitations in his game.
Quinnen will be a decision, too, coming up
Wade had the misfortune of having Jerry's pet project as his OC. Jerry was just itching for the chance to kick Wade to the curb and promote GarrettWade was the only HC ever dropped kick out in midseason
but as regards a coordinator I cannot remember any
Yep ........that was always Wade's defense. Top 5 for his first year or 2 and then a huge drop off. It's he never coached for one team for more than 3-4 years.If I’m not mistaken those Wade defenses started getting torched by anyone and I think David Garrard doing it was the nail in the coffin.
haha, ...I thought about that too. Who would have been replacement on the fly like that?Who knows what our record is if we fired him though….might've gotten slightly bette lol
I was thinking Whitecotton. And for the record they still would be bad but you know how a new coach brings in a extra game or two in the win column lolhaha, ...I thought about that too. Who would have been replacement on the fly like that?
So yeah, maybe they win two more games ...
Mike Nolan wasn't fired midseason, but he should have been!! Terrible defense under his watch!!Wade was the only HC ever dropped kick out in midseason
but as regards a coordinator I cannot remember any
You folks always get the trade wrong. Its honestly almost willful misinformation.Don't forget the 2 - 4th round picks we got from Philly in that trade down.
Season of sabotage.LOL....Wade Phillips ( remember that's how we ended up with Garrett)
This is a disingenuous presentation and that’s giving you the most generous benefit of the doubtWould you rather have.....?
Micah Parsons
or
Kenny Clark, Quinnen Williams, Malachi Lawrence, Rashan Gary, and Ottito Ogbonnia
That's what the trade and subsequent offseason decisions essentially brought with the money Micah wanted.
And it provided the depth to make the Osa trade possible that brought Barham.
It may be early, but this has shades of the Herschel Walker trade about it.
Best offseason roster management we've seen around here in a long, long time.
Season of Sabotage is what Jerry did to this team last season by dropping a nuke six days before kickoff and waiting nine weeks to even attempt a course correction.Season of sabotage.
It's ok. Admit you were grotesquely wrong and move on. Like all the other threads. Must get tiring.This is a disingenuous presentation and that’s giving you the most generous benefit of the doubt
In the end, it’s quite likely that will will have given up more capital to acquire Q than GB gave ip to get Micah and you leave out the true cost of course
I predicted at the time of the trade that supporters of the front office would end up attributing every positive thing that happened for the next two years to the Micah trade and, of course, that’s what has happened
