Twitter: Dak Prescott owns the NFC East

[Vtwin]

You don’t know what tribalism is?

A couple examples would be, like how you band up with a handful of cohorts to support and encourage each other against your antagonists. Examples in this thread.

and, my personal favorite example...

How you often say "we" in front of whatever insult you're going to throw next. as if you are speaking for others, aka your tribe. The inclusion of "we" gives you the illusion of support from your tribe.

Personally, I think classifying what you and I and everyone does regarding supporting like-minded individuals with agreement as tribalism is a real reach.

Pretending to speak for others so as to give the illusion of some sort of numbers backed support is far more tribalistic.

Ever hear of the FATE model of manipulation tactics?
F- Focus
A- Authority
T- Tribe
E- Emotion

Appeal to the tribe is a tried and true tactic.

 

[Vtwin]

Easily. When he makes dumb comments like, (quarterback A) is better than Dak because the Cowboys lost to the team (quarterback A) plays for....

but when Dallas lose its all a Dak problem according to him

Yet again. If you rightfully accept these two premises as false you're argument falls flat.

You're arguing something that did not happen. You're also running and hiding.

Seems both low IQ and cowardly, but what do I know...

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

Easily. When he makes dumb comments like, ... thats a pretty dumb and fraudulent comparison, correct?

So I'll play his game, according to his narratives and say "well I guess that means Dak is better than Mahomes and Hurts because the Cowboys team beat the Eagles and Chiefs last season, correct"?

Here's where the hypocrisy comes in and he'll give some team related reasons why those teams loss to the Cowboys, but when Dallas lose its all a Dak problem according to him. So all in all, its fun making him look pretty dumb using the logic his small brain created THEN watch him back peddle mid-narrative when that same logic is applied to other quarterbacks/teams in the same identical situations.

Like I said, its fun and entertaining making people expose their dumb football IQs using the narratives they create. Its actually too easy....

Sorry..I'm so dense!

I still don't get how using things you say are "dumb football narratives" to show 'em what's what...is..a thing.

If it's dumb, you using the narrative must also be dumb. I'm just not sure you're doing what you think.

But hey...if you're having fun with it...by all means carry on then.

PS...I honestly made an effort to go back and find who said "(quarterback A) is better than Dak because the Cowboys lost to the team (quarterback A) plays for." But 24 pages? Please forgive me.

And I noticed you didn't say this in the "Dak own Hurts" thread.

 

[GINeric]

Your problem, like I've already explained to you, is you create a strawman then argue vehemently about something nobody ever said. Of course, this makes your "facts" irrelevant to anything other than the argument you're having with yourself.

For example. Somebody says something along the lines of, Prescott didn't play well for much of the game but started producing late leading to a comeback attempt that fell short.

You reply as if the poster said Prescott was completely responsible for the loss. You then take it even farther off the rails by implying the poster also meant that not winning a SB is entirely on Prescott.

Then you come in with your "facts" (Dilfer, Foles, Marino, demanding example of QB's who won SBs with a terrible defense, etc)

You constantly twist things to use your "facts" to argue a point that was never made. Then you call us low IQ cowards. lol

Now explain why you ran from our back and forth a few days ago when you were presented with this same reasoning?

You sir come across as a low IQ coward and a hypocrite.

First of all, I don't reply to anyone "as IF they said anything". I reply to the people who actually said what they said, I don't have to make anything up.

With that said, please show me what "back and forth" ive ever ran from?? I definitely appreciate the great laugh you just gave me. See the problem is, people like you and the other people don't like when I present actual facts to put your narratives to bed.

Thats the real problem for you. When I expose you and your lil minions hypocritical and double standard filled posts, you start crying out "strawman! strawman! strawman!"....

Yet you never check the people here who post weak arguments and cant back them up with facts. You don't check those people who run from a healthy debate.

So what that tells me is that you are super weak, you're not capable of growing a pair, you're obviously a low IQ coward in many ways than just football discussions, especially defending hypocrites. You can go play now. Run along....

 

[GINeric]

Yet again. If you rightfully accept these two premises as false you're argument falls flat.

You're arguing something that did not happen. You're also running and hiding.

Seems both low IQ and cowardly, but what do I know...

Running and hiding from what? You're weak lil bro. I didn't create those narratives, your lil boyfriends did. So why don't you explain that to him?

 

[GINeric]

Sorry..I'm so dense!

I still don't get how using things you say are "dumb football narratives" to show 'em what's what...is..a thing.

If it's dumb, you using the narrative must also be dumb. I'm just not sure you're doing what you think.

But hey...if you're having fun with it...by all means carry on then.

PS...I honestly made an effort to go back and find who said "(quarterback A) is better than Dak because the Cowboys lost to the team (quarterback A) plays for." But 24 pages? Please forgive me.

And I noticed you didn't say this in the "Dak own Hurts" thread.

Quarterbacks don't own anyone... teams do.

 

[ratkinson]

You said it can get worse. I keep asking you how...and you say "I said what I said".

Then you accuse ME...of gaslighting?

Well Okay...fine..it can get worse than nothing. Not making the playoffs can make the playoffs worse. I think I got ya now.

I doubt if you got anything. Sounds like you're trying to cry victim by accusing me of gaslighting... Lol
You need to reread post # 404 and my response, since you're having such a hard time understanding my intent.
Now you are free to find other members that are willing to follow you down your Rabbit Hole style of tired debate.
I'm done here.

 

[ratkinson]

That’s his MO. But will say you are the one causing him to fall in a rabbit hole.

How's that?

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Running and hiding from what? You're weak lil bro. I didn't create those narratives, your lil boyfriends did. So why don't you explain that to him?

He won’t. Tribalism. Him and his flock agree on everything. And they are so deep when they know they are wrong they will double down on the stupidity. He can’t tell OG he’s wrong because it goes against them.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

How's that?

Man I don’t know at this point when they are losing a debate they resort to being gaslit and falling down a rabbit hole. I’ve never seen people in real life behave that way.

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

I doubt if you got anything. Sounds like you're trying to cry victim by accusing me of gaslighting... Lol
You need to reread post # 404 and my response, since you're having such a hard time understanding my intent.
Now you are free to find other members that are willing to follow you down your Rabbit Hole style of tired debate.
I'm done here.

Lol see #404.....out of almost 500 comments.

"Yes it can" is your only answer? And when I beg you to say how...you point to #404 "Yes it can" as your explanation. Then claim I'm the rabbit hole?


Good lord you guys are getting good I been punked hard holy cr ap!

 

[charron]

I wish this stat meant something, but it doesn't.

 

[OGSixshooter]

I'm a bit curious...if the narratives you exposed were "flawed, fraudulent, and hypcritical"....how could they be used to legitimately expose anything?

I mean...I now...I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed....but I know "a bad tree cannot bear good fruit."

LMAO!!! As a former super devout pastor...that one hit different!

 

[OGSixshooter]

I’m not gonna lie I’m shocked you pulled up after the beating Gin gave you.

Is that you Gin? More Trolling? I'm failing to see how the Unholy Trinity - You, Farce-Vader and Too Much Gin - did anything but plant a flag on some ice and declare it the North Pole.

All he did was pose dumb questions that we've already answered. If I think I'm dealing in a serious, honest debate - even if it is with low-information fan boys - I'll engage. If it's trolling, I got better things to do.

Posing a question as if it's the first time to get attention is Trolling 101. See your post as well.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

LMAO!!! As a former super devout pastor...that one hit different!

Pastor?

 

[Rockport]

Lol see #404.....out of almost 500 comments.

"Yes it can" is your only answer? And when I beg you to say how...you point to #404 "Yes it can" as your explanation. Then claim I'm the rabbit hole?


Good lord you guys are getting good I been punked hard holy cr ap!

Speaking of rabbit hole.

 

[Rockport]

Lol see #404.....out of almost 500 comments.

"Yes it can" is your only answer? And when I beg you to say how...you point to #404 "Yes it can" as your explanation. Then claim I'm the rabbit hole?


Good lord you guys are getting good I been punked hard holy cr ap!

Speaking of rabbit hole. It’s your MO.

 

[OGSixshooter]

Pastor?

 

[DallasEast]

Just another day in the Zone...

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

Is that you Gin? More Trolling? I'm failing to see how the Unholy Trinity - You, Farce-Vader and Too Much Gin - did anything but plant a flag on some ice and declare it the North Pole.

All he did was pose dumb questions that we've already answered. If I think I'm dealing in a serious, honest debate - even if it is with low-information fan boys - I'll engage. If it's trolling, I got better things to do.

Posing a question as if it's the first time to get attention is Trolling 101. See your post as well.

The style is incredibly similar. Not just the typing.