Twitter: Would you rather have Clowney or Miller

First of all, I think the asking price will not be the same.

I firmly believe that Clowney is looking for more money. It’s always been his M.O., and why he’s bounced around the league.

I also believe that Dallas could get Miller at a discount because of who they are and where they’re located. Miller has said so himself that he’d love to play close to home.

So, for me, it’s the less expensive Von Miller.

It essentially forces you to keep 6 outside linebackers, but I think Miller still has some gas in the tank in a rotational role.
Who are we for Miller to take a discount
 
Not sure about that. Miller was signed in mid-July last year. I prefer to get players under contract before someone else sees they have a need and signs them. Of course, like I said, I'm not sure that Clowney will sign with anyone until camp is nearly over since that has been his MO of late, so he might be available if it looks like our young guys are going to need some developmental time.
I suspect that’s how it plays out. We need to see what we have and a guy like Clowney doesn’t need camp. Obviously there’s risks to waiting. But I’m hoping we get the young guys lots of reps early in pre season so we can make a decision. Ideally a guy steps up
 
IMHO, it depends on what you want/need.

If you want/need a guy that can play every down as a full time starter due to injury, you get Clowney.
If you want a situational pass rusher with a load of big time/big game experience who might be able to pass that info down to the younger players, you get Miller.

Honestly, I think that we have Clowney type players on the team. We do NOT have a Von Miller.

If I could only get one for THIS team, I'd get Miller.
 
The ONLY reason to need Clowney on this team is if EZ/Malachi/Barsham all bust.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,353
Messages
14,532,100
Members
24,210
Latest member
Jtom95
Back
Top