Being positive vs negative all the time

dupree89 said:
:popcorn:
Click to expand...
P9UcswV.gif
 
Rockport said:
Just to state again for the 174th time, when I talk about negative people I’m talking about people who ALWAYS complain about almost everyone and everything . It’s ok to criticize. There’s a lot of things to criticize but doing it all the time is an illness.
Click to expand...
Now this is a post I can agree with.
I can do without the nitpickers that switch and complain about every little thing.

Lack of effort is what makes me negative failing to prepare is preparing to fail in my opinion.

This year I'm excited and I'm positive we have made improvements in our defense effort has been made and I'm sure everyone will see a difference and there will be a lot of positive commentary.

There needs to be effort made every year to keep a positive atmosphere.

Conversely if CD lamb drops a whole bunch of balls against the eagles and here's footsteps again this year I will be as critical and negative as they come.
 
Rockport said:
I just stated facts. They pertain to you so of course you don’t have the intestinal fortitude to admit it. So you and the others attack me non stop.
Click to expand...
Right here is the root of your problem. There is not one single fact in the OP. You mistake opinions you agree with as facts.

Your absolute insistence that your opinion overrides everyone else's opinion and justifies your personal attacks does nothing more than put the dog on high alert and in a defensive posturing position.

Then you somehow are able to twist that into justification to assume a victim mentality.

Some people walk the dog. Some people are walked by the dog.
 
This isn't hard...

The Dallas Cowboys ARE a paper tiger. 30 plus years of ineptitude. That's a fact.

Hence being negative is being REALISTIC. Being positive is being UNREALISTIC.

If you want this to change Dallas needs to break the streak of ineptitude.

It's pretty simple.
 
Vtwin said:
Right here is the root of your problem. There is not one single fact in the OP. You mistake opinions you agree with as facts.

Your absolute insistence that your opinion overrides everyone else's opinion and justifies your personal attacks does nothing more than put the dog on high alert and in a defensive posturing position.

Then you somehow are able to twist that into justification to assume a victim mentality.

Some people walk the dog. Some people are walked by the dog.
Click to expand...
Damn ......
 
DallasEast said:
narcissist noun (link)
nar·cis·sist ˈnär-sə-sist
a : an extremely self-centered person who has an exaggerated sense of self-importance
________________

Jerry Jones is a simple person to understand. He runs football operations because he thinks that highly of himself. He positioned his family within the same organizational structure as an extension of his personal concept of authority and final decision-making.
Click to expand...
Very true brother he is a narcissist for sure.
His lack of a conscience for his fan base for such an extended period of time is just difficult to deal with.

You would think that at some point the light would come on and he would throw us some kind of a bone.

Since there's absolutely no accountability he continues on in the same manner unfortunately he can't be voted out and we are just left to endure hoping to win by attrition.
 
DallasEast said:
It's a mystery. I don't get it either. I'll ask Jeff. He'll know what to make of it. Right Jeff?

5v9hpL2.gif


I'm gonna go out on a limb here, but I don't think Jeff understands it either.
Click to expand...
lmao...you know what? That might be how Rockports eys look while viewing his post and agruing with everyone.
 
nate dizzle said:
Society was already on the decline as far as being able to communicate effectively. Literacy, grammar, reading comprehension were all in steep decline. This will make it worse. A lot worse.

"Me disagree with Rocky, write why Rocky wrong"

Beep boop rrrrrrr beeeep:

I disagree with this because it creates a false choice between being positive and being negative. You can be realistic without being miserable.

Being critical of the Cowboys isn't "pre-pain"—it's a response to nearly three decades of results. Fans have watched talented rosters fall short year after year, so skepticism isn't irrational; it's evidence-based.

Hope doesn't require ignoring history. In fact, expecting the organization to prove it can consistently succeed before buying in is a reasonable standard. Blind optimism can be just as unhealthy as constant negativity because it can lead to lowering expectations and accepting mediocrity.

You also assume negative fans don't enjoy wins, but many do. In fact, when expectations are low, victories can be even sweeter because they're earned rather than assumed. Likewise, optimistic fans often experience greater disappointment when the team inevitably falls short of lofty expectations.

Finally, being a fan doesn't mean you owe the team unwavering positivity. Fans invest their time, money, and emotions into the Cowboys. They've earned the right to criticize an organization that hasn't reached an NFC Championship Game in decades. Holding the team accountable isn't bitterness—it's wanting the franchise to meet the standard it has set for itself.

Optimism has its place, but so does healthy skepticism. Neither mindset makes someone a better or worse fan.
Click to expand...
Oh there are definitely pros and cons of all technological advancements. They will make are lives easier while also depriving our mental and physical capabilities...At the end of the day it is the advancements are inevitable so you have to learn to make the most of them, while losing your capabilities along the way. Those who want to improve themselves intellectually and physically will continue to do so irregardless, those who don't will most continue to decline whether the technology is there or not.

As for as the optimism vs pessimisim I think its healthy to have a little bit of both and not heavily index on one over the other.
 
Rockport said:
Being positive isn’t about pretending the Cowboys have been successful — it’s about protecting your sanity, your enjoyment, and your identity as a fan. Negativity feels “realistic,” but long‑term it drains you, narrows your perspective, and makes the whole experience miserable.

Being negative about the Cowboys doesn’t change the record, the roster, or Jerry’s decisions.
It just changes you — your mood, your enjoyment, your energy.

Positivity is the only mindset that gives you a return on investment:

• You enjoy the wins more
• You survive the losses easier
• You stay connected to the team without burning out

The always negative type think:
“If I expect failure, I can’t be disappointed.”

But here’s the truth:
They’re still disappointed — they just ruin the season in advance and they become bitter.

Positive fans get:

• Hope during the season
• Excitement during wins
• A buffer during losses

Negativity is just pre‑pain.

So that’s why I always preach, stay positive and go Cowboys.
Click to expand...
I'm positively stupid.

In 1992 I place a $100 bet at 15-1 odds for the Cowboys to win the Super Bowl. I won $1,500 and met Charles Haley (and played blackjack with him).

1993 I won again, only 3.5-1 odds, so I won $350.

1995 I won again, I think 5-1 odds, $500

1996 to about 2019 I made that same bet every summer. Positive I would win again. I won nada, zilch, scratch.

I'm thinking about placing the bet again this year, what do you think?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Staff online

Members online

... and 49 more.
Total: 19,011 (members: 149, guests: 18,862)
Robots: 2,282

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,424
Messages
14,536,689
Members
24,211
Latest member
yurikodiaz21
Back
Top