News: Fox: Tony Romo arrested in Milwaukee for OWI

You can derp all you want, you ignorant wretch. I think this conversation got a bit too deep for a semi-literate, self-proclaimed taco engineer. The moment you stooped to ad hominem attacks, you admitted you didn't have an argument worth making. They're a lot easier than forming a coherent thought, aren't they? Now get back to the kitchen and "engineer" some more tacos, payaso.
 

Question: "...I wanted to ask you about someone you care a great deal about. One of your great former players, Tony Romo, and what he is experiencing right now, and if you had a chance to talk to him. And what are your thoughts about what he is experiencing right now."

Answer: <confirms talking with Romo and goes immediately into sell mode>
 
Question: "...I wanted to ask you about someone you care a great deal about. One of your great former players, Tony Romo, and what he is experiencing right now, and if you had a chance to talk to him. And what are your thoughts about what he is experiencing right now."

Answer: <confirms talking with Romo and goes immediately into sell mode>
Jerry doesn’t work for cbs so not sure what he’s trying to sell.
 
Jerry doesn’t work for cbs so not sure what he’s trying to sell.
He sold a whimsical rendition of Romo's perseverance in the face of his current predicament. Longwinded nonsense that exceeded the requirements of a straight answer. That is Jones' usual forté and totally expected.
 
You can derp all you want, you ignorant wretch. I think this conversation got a bit too deep for a semi-literate, self-proclaimed taco engineer. The moment you stooped to ad hominem attacks, you admitted you didn't have an argument worth making. They're a lot easier than forming a coherent thought, aren't they? Now get back to the kitchen and "engineer" some more tacos, payaso.
I truly hope you recover.
 
Dak too, right?

He was convicted of drunk driving.
This whole situation seems blown out of proportion. Plenty of people in professional sports have had run-ins with the law, yet it’s rare to see such immediate consequences before any proof is established.

Take the Dallas Cowboys, for example,


there are countless stories across the NFL of arrests, especially DUIs, and many players kept their jobs without being put on leave or suspended.

In this case, it’s a minor first offense misdemeanor, barely more than a traffic violation; no accident, no injuries, no fleeing from police.

There hasn’t even been a breathalyzer or blood test to confirm he was over the limit.

Still, ESPN put him on leave before results came back. It’s frustrating to see someone treated this way when there’s no actual proof of wrongdoing, especially compared to other high-profile incidents that were far more serious. If this is really a first offense, most people wouldn’t lose their job over it.

Our criminal justice system has been broken for a while because you’re supposed to be innocent until proven guilty, but I’ve been through this twice.

Not with a DUI, but once it was a DUI arrest where they claimed I failed the field sobriety test. Yes I've been falsely arrested twice you know what I still when I get pulled over I comply and I do what they ask even though I know that police officers are not perfect the things they do are subjective and I have three of them in my family but these field sobriety tests are a joke so don't just take that word for it that they felt like he was drunk how do you feel like he was drunk?


They wouldn’t give me a breathalyzer to prove my innocence, even though I begged for one because I knew I wasn’t drunk. They insisted on a blood test, made me pay a ton in bail and bonds, and required me to check in weekly with a bondsman and a probation-type officer. They wasted 90 days of my life and about $7,000, never apologized, never refunded me, and my blood test came back 0.00, nothing in it to justify failing that test.

It all came down to the subjective opinion of an officer who can decide to put you in jail, and once they pull you out of your vehicle, it feels like 90% of the time you’re going in. But it’s even worse for people like Romo, who get plastered all over TV, Facebook, and social media before they can defend themselves.

He’s put on leave without any proof. I didn’t hear anything in that video that should’ve gotten a guy fired, and I’d bet there are a thousand people at ESPN who have gone to happy hour, had a few drinks, and left, that doesn’t automatically make you intoxicated or over the limit.
 
...feel bad for the guy, but lady cop is way.......over performing.

And this proves nothing to me read my other responses it's ridiculous the dudes under all this immense pressure you met all the sun and the time that he spent at the golf course only needed to go home and take a nap and instead for the next three hours he's grilled like he's in a lab being forced to do weird stuff to prove whether they should arrest you or not...

Whether he's innocent or guilty it doesn't matter what I've seen is not a guy that's falling down drunk he didn't get in an accident and hurt anybody And from what I understand in OWI first offense is not much more than traffic ticket on steroids in Wisconsin..

Hey I get it there are people that are sensitive about DUI but I'm saying innocent until proven guilty but these type field sobriety tests are absolutely not fair and they're not a determination of whether you're drunk or not I was falsely arrested the same way and I had 0.0 in my blood test so tell me how that works They told me my eyes and my pupils didn't stay steady like I didn't follow their stupid light and pen properly,

And they denied me a breathalyzer which I absolutely wanted don't think what you're seeing means anything because it is stupid like saying your alphabet backward making you do crazy **** that even sober people can't do i'm not saying that he's not over living I'm not saying that he's not drunk but how about we give the dude a break this stuff is getting into control the other thread got shut down this one might too Let the man alone if this happened to you anybody in here your employer wouldn't know none of your friends would know would move on with your life like it never happened instead this guy's put on leave you know he's supposed to be innocent he'll proven guilty and he's been plastered and I mean absolutely this is more than Tiger Woods maybe they're used to it Tiger Woods but I've never seen this much coverage and videos and angles of his arrest it's so insane...
 
Good point, they don't all have the analyzer. Hopefully I am never in that position again, but I would refuse everything based on what I know now. Generally, refusal of the breathalyzer is an automatic suspension of your license. I would take that instead of relying on an unreliable test. I'm not sure if anyone has mentioned it but even the blood tests are unreliable. My point is, don't convict yourself, which I think a lot of people do.
I agree almost 100%. Don't talk too much either. That's not helping you. However, I got pulled over a few weeks ago for going 62 in a 50 zone. I was going to work, not drinking. They ask the usual. Where are you coming from, where are you going. You don't have to answer that. But if I just gave them my paperwork and said talk to my lawyer, I'm probably getting a ticket. So I answered those questions in that situation.

I can understand people being worried about their balance in general, as they get older. So don't do that, ask for the breathalyzer. If you're not drinking, it works perfectly fine. In the 5 years I worked road maintenance, I was randomly drug tested and given the breathalyzer probably a dozen times. I had no problems.
 
My Dad always had an open beer in the car. Not saying it was right, but he always got us home safe. People forget the legal alcohol level used to be almost double what it is now.
Are you talking the 70s? Because I had family members with a beer between their legs as well. It was normal.
 
When I moved to Texas 40 years ago, you could still legally drink and drive....was sooooooo commonplace for people to be throwing back a tall boy or two on the way home from work. It wasn't until the mid 90's that it became illegal for anyone in the vehicle to have an open container.
I don't remember when they made the law on open containers in New Jersey. But it's not just that, everything is different now. Back in the 80s, if you were under the limit, you were good to go. Now, even if you are under the limit, they can still charge you with DUI based on other evidence. They never nitpicked like that years ago.
 
Not convicted of anything yet. He didn't pull the 'do you know who I am' card either.
People can at least wait till the blood test comes back and see what that shows.

If he was way up over the limit sure I'd be disappointed in his judgment.

But if he's under the limit and just had a couple beers which is what the sobriety test showed to me he looked perfectly able to operate a vehicle he wasn't falling down drunk slurring his words he was very coherent and very respectful during the incident.

So I'm going to give him the benefit of the doubt until the blood test comes back.
 
People can at least wait till the blood test comes back and see what that shows.

If he was way up over the limit sure I'd be disappointed in his judgment.

But if he's under the limit and just had a couple beers which is what the sobriety test showed to me he looked perfectly able to operate a vehicle he wasn't falling down drunk slurring his words he was very coherent and very respectful during the incident.

So I'm going to give him the benefit of the doubt until the blood test comes back.
He refused the blood test if I recall.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,553
Messages
14,545,188
Members
24,212
Latest member
JerryJonesSupporter
Back
Top