- Messages
- 69,405
- Reaction score
- 80,419
Let's not bring John Williams into this, lol.Is it he Jaws theme music???? Hold me, I’m scared![]()
Let's not bring John Williams into this, lol.Is it he Jaws theme music???? Hold me, I’m scared![]()
Ok, let's get it straight.Curious, who is responsible for holding a team from scoring from their own 45?
And who is tasked with holding opposing team's offense from scoring from their own 25?
Also, is the expectation that Dak throw the ball, a dime, into his own breadbasket down field? Or is the guy on a franchise tag who wants to get paid have any responsibility too?
If a teams morale is shot over 1 interception, one where QB was scrambling for his life and throwing off back foot and defender made a fantastic play on ball and great catch, then Id say maybe that team is weak.
I have ignored about 99% of your posts of late, and don't trust you to use logic and common sense, as it typically back tracks to your hate attacks, etc, which is childish. That said, you are correct about the TOP, but that is for the entire game, 1st half TOP was pretty much 50/50. No doubt, we couldnt get off the field in the 2nd half, but we had equal time in the 1st, and it was the INT that put us down late leading into the Giants getting the ball back to start the 3rd quarter.TOP
Giants 36:40
Cowboys 23:20
Just stating facts. Are you refuting the outrageous TOP difference? Those are facts.I have ignored about 99% of your posts of late, and don't trust you to use logic and common sense, as it typically back tracks to your hate attacks, etc, which is childish. That said, you are correct about the TOP, but that is for the entire game, 1st half TOP was pretty much 50/50. No doubt, we couldnt get off the field in the 2nd half, but we had equal time in the 1st, and it was the INT that put us down late leading into the Giants getting the ball back to start the 3rd quarter.
Anyhow, the useless point about this thread is the OP blaming the worlds problem on everything but our QB, when in fact, it was a team failure. Th job of a HC is to keep the opposing teams offense off of the field, or simply state Harbaught's plan was to keep Dak and the O off of the field. She clearly has an agenda to troll the board about 1 player on the team, at least you have kind of turned the corner....ish
No, not at all. The TOP variance was all in the 2nd half. Before you came back from grabbing your beer, we were down 2 TD's. That is the death nail for many NFL teams, and it did us in.Just stating facts. Are you refuting the outrageous TOP difference? Those are facts.
Why was there such a huge difference in TOP?No, not at all. The TOP variance was all in the 2nd half. Before you came back from grabbing your beer, we were down 2 TD's. That is the death knell for many NFL teams, and it did us in.
2nd half TOP was heavily in the Giants favour, hence, why we only had 2 possessions. They got up by 2 TD's, and just ran our D into the ground. That is the kind of game we need to win, not be on the wrong side of. Giants had 21 mins, Cowboys had 9....2 scores did us in midway through the gameWhy was there such a huge difference in TOP?
Haven't seen much mentioned about Prescott's decision making on that play but you nailed it here.Ok, let's get it straight.
1. Dak lied. If he was throwing it out of bounds, he could have just chunked it 10 yards to the bleachers beyond the LOS. He was out of the pocket. The truth is, he tried to hit his receiver and threw a lame duck.
2. Why would you throw it out of bounds anyway? That stops the clock for the Giants. You take the sack there. He's not the brightest bulb.
3. He panicked. Again.
Too many dropped passes on offense and too many penalties and a young defense playing for the first time. As I think you said, they should’ve won the game anyways.2nd half TOP was heavily in the Giants favour, hence, why we only had 2 possessions. They got up by 2 TD's, and just ran our D into the ground. That is the kind of game we need to win, not be on the wrong side of. Giants had 21 mins, Cowboys had 9....2 scores did us in midway through the game
Don't reacall where I said they should have won during the game, but going in, I like many thought we would have this one. We were outmatched on both sides of the ball, and on the sidelines. You aren't wrong about dropped passes either, GP did a disappearing act. Logic suggests Washington gets drilled.......don't know if the NFL is logical anymore thoughToo many dropped passes on offense and too many penalties and a young defense playing for the first time. As I think you said, they should’ve won the game anyways.
You can tell he was trying to throw it away while throwing off his back foot.Ok, let's get it straight.
1. Dak lied. If he was throwing it out of bounds, he could have just chunked it 10 yards to the bleachers beyond the LOS. He was out of the pocket. The truth is, he tried to hit his receiver and threw a lame duck.
2. Why would you throw it out of bounds anyway? That stops the clock for the Giants. You take the sack there. He's not the brightest bulb.
3. He panicked. Again.
Christmas in SeptemberTake me out to the ballgame!
Take me out to the crowd!
Buy me some peanuts and CRACKER Jacks!
I don't care if I never get back!
Let me ROOT ROOT ROOT for the home team!
If they don't win it's a shame!
For it's ONE TWO THREE strikes you're out!
At the old BALL game!
That interception was a potential 14 point swingYou can tell he was trying to throw it away while throwing off his back foot.
Yes he should've either taken sack or threw closer. My point is the game did not hinge on a 2nd quarter interception. The defense from that point forward could not get off the field.
Thats on the zdefense, not Dak.

The INT changed momentum in the game that was tied at the time, right? The Giants drove the field to take the lead before getting the ball back after the half. The game may not have hinged upon that 1 play, but the momentum certainly didYou can tell he was trying to throw it away while throwing off his back foot.
Yes he should've either taken sack or threw closer. My point is the game did not hinge on a 2nd quarter interception. The defense from that point forward could not get off the field.
Thats on the zdefense, not Dak.
As did the dime he dropped in bread basket of zpickens the play before. He catches that as he should and no int.The INT changed momentum in the game that was tied at the time, right? The Giants drove the field to take the lead before getting the ball back after the half. The game may not have hinged upon that 1 play, but the momentum certainly did
Anyone that knows football and doesn't have an agenda, knows this game, wasn't on Dak. Dak wasn't perfect, but most are and defenses normally allow the offense a screw up now and then. Works both waysYup, by miniziming his possessions. 8:21 time of possession in the 2nd half, Harbaughs wanted to walk Dak every time he came to the plate.
He didn't let him swing the bat much. Not a bad plan, just more of a statement as to how it's not the Quarterbacks fault.
If you don't let him throw the ball, Quarterback can do nothing.
LOL, no, you are quick to defend our QB. Make another thread about the GP drop if you want to feel better about yourself, because an incomplete pass is just a bit different than an iNT. For all you know, GP catches that and 3 plays later another INT......hope you don't find a 12 foot straw to grasp atAs did the dime he dropped in bread basket of zpickens the play before. He catches that as he should and no int.
Yall so desperate to blame one dude.
my man, you are replying to someobody that only has an agenda LOL....Pepperoni sticks and Coke Zero for lunch, don't test me!!!!Anyone that knows football and doesn't have an agenda, knows this game, wasn't on Dak. Dak wasn't perfect, but most are and defenses normally allow the offense a screw up now and then. Works both ways
You can tell he was trying to throw it away while throwing off his back foot.
