Cowboys O scoring at a historic pace

[JayFord]

They should rename the offense

WDHAC

“We dont have a choice”

The defense is activly finding ways to give up 2 touchdowns in one drive

 

[Hagman]

The top 3 are in the last 6 years. That makes the Cowboys 4th in the last 6 years.

In no way does that classify as anything resembling "historic."

It's also comparing 4 games to full seasons.

The chart shows results for the last 26 years.
The English language is not capable of making things any more clear than that.

 

[Kevinicus]

The chart shows results for the last 26 years.
The English language is not capable of making things any more clear than that.

And? How does that contradict what I said? The chart also shows the years for each occurrence. Notice that the top 3 are since 2020. That means the Cowboys numbers (which again are 4 games, not a season like those others in the chart) are the 4th best in the last 7 years (my bad on 6 before, though we're only 4 games into the 7th).

Everybody out here butchering the meaning of "historic" and at the same time acting like English savants.

SMH

 

[McKDaddy]

Everybody out here butchering the meaning of "historic" and at the same time acting like English savants.

Because they wanna believe the post. If they didn't, they would be picking it apart.

You really can't make this stuff up.

Besides with the investment in the offense, they SHOULD be approaching historic. How else you gonna be the GOTI??

 

[dogberry]

How many points per drive will the offense need to make to cover for our defense? I don’t think 4 is enough.

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

Per drive. Read lol

More narrowing of the criteria to confirm an agenda.

You seem to hang your hat on "per drive" stats for some reason. As if regular stat-keeping by EVERYONE ELSE..is nonsense.

 

[Cowboysheelsreds053]

Is English not your first language?

LOL, this board is off the charts!

 

[Nav22]

The top 3 are in the last 6 years. That makes the Cowboys 4th in the last 6 years.

In no way does that classify as anything resembling "historic."

It's also comparing 4 games to full seasons.

"What do 'pace' mean?!?"

And LOL at the notion that it doesn't count as "historic" if other similarly historic seasons happened recently.

 

[Nav22]

More narrowing of the criteria to confirm an agenda.

You seem to hang your hat on "per drive" stats for some reason. As if regular stat-keeping by EVERYONE ELSE..is nonsense.

You humiliated yourself before by arguing against "per drive" stats.

 

[CWR]

I think it’s saying last 20 years not last 6.

Even 6 would be crazy good. We're talking about 32 teams X 6 years and we're 4th. So top 4 out of 192 just doesn't impress some people lol.

 

[big dog cowboy]

Was this thread started just to bash the D or did it get sidetracked from the very first post?

Yes you are correct.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

The top 3 are in the last 6 years. That makes the Cowboys 4th in the last 6 years.

In no way does that classify as anything resembling "historic."

It's also comparing 4 games to full seasons.

4th in the last 20 years is elite company. And it’s only been 4 games but I think that’s why it said “on pace”

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Even 6 would be crazy good. We're talking about 32 teams X 6 years and we're 4th. So top 4 out of 192 just doesn't impress some people lol.

I agree.

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

You humiliated yourself before by arguing against "per drive" stats.

If you say so.

I don; t mind stats. Even narrow ones. But when I guy argues every stat MUST be "per drive"...EVERY time? YOU..know full well this isn't the first time. You jumped in my junk the last time he did it. You know he does it every time.

He...is the "embarrasement". So are you.